| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sgarcia
Apprentice
Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 254
Location: Bakersfield, CA
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:21 pm Post subject: GraphicsMagick conflicts with ImageMagick? |
 |
|
I just tried to install GraphicsMagick (well, it was pulled in as a dependency), but I get a conflict note with my existing ImageMagick. It tells me I can't have both installed at the same time. I did a web search, and those sites that discuss the compatibility say that both can reside on the same system with no problems. However, most of the web pages that make this claim are several years old.
The current GraphicsMagick page says, "GM does not does not conflict with other installed software." That's pretty vague, but it supports the notion that they should be able to coexist.
So does anyone know why the GraphicsMagick ebuild excludes ImageMagick?
I'm a bit afraid to remove ImageMagick, since I foresee lots of breakage on all kinds of packages that expect IM to be there.
_________________
Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Veldrin
Veteran
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1945
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check your useflags...
It seems, that the imagemagick useflag on graphicsmagick forbids imagemagick to be installed on the system. Try to remove/unset the useflag.
just my .02$
V.
PS. relevant parts from graphicsmagick ebuild
| Code: | ....
RDEPEND="app-text/ghostscript-gpl
bzip2? ( app-arch/bzip2 )
fpx? ( media-libs/libfpx )
jbig? ( media-libs/jbigkit )
jpeg? ( media-libs/jpeg )
jpeg2k? ( >=media-libs/jasper-1.701.0 )
lcms? ( media-libs/lcms )
perl? ( dev-lang/perl )
png? ( media-libs/libpng )
svg? ( dev-libs/libxml2 )
tiff? ( >=media-libs/tiff-3.8.2 )
truetype? ( >=media-libs/freetype-2.0 )
wmf? ( media-libs/libwmf )
X? ( x11-libs/libXext x11-libs/libSM )
imagemagick? ( !media-gfx/imagemagick )"
.... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sgarcia
Apprentice
Joined: 21 May 2003
Posts: 254
Location: Bakersfield, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Huh.
You're absolutely right! That's pretty counter-intuitive, but it seems to be working. Thanks!
_________________
Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WintermuteX
n00b
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 48
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, thats braindead. Because graphicsmagick should be a dropin replacement for imagemagick, the USE flag compiles further tools which would conflict with imagemagick since they replace imagemagick.
But gentoo in it's allmighty wisdom choose to make fun of us and forces imagemagick EVEN if there is graphicsmagick with imagemagick USE flag, as GM is superior I feel fooled.
PS: so, this is clearly a bug! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SamuliSuominen
Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 2133
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| WintermuteX wrote: | No, thats braindead. Because graphicsmagick should be a dropin replacement for imagemagick, the USE flag compiles further tools which would conflict with imagemagick since they replace imagemagick.
But gentoo in it's allmighty wisdom choose to make fun of us and forces imagemagick EVEN if there is graphicsmagick with imagemagick USE flag, as GM is superior I feel fooled.
PS: so, this is clearly a bug! |
Some packages really force imagemagick or graphicsmagick in purpose because neither one is a replacement to anothers libraries. Only 1/3 of the reverse dependencies use the tools, rest use the libraries which don't match at all.
Not a bug. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mv
Watchman
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 6747
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ssuominen wrote: | | Only 1/3 of the reverse dependencies use the tools, rest use the libraries which don't match at all. |
Wouldn't it be time to introduce virtual/imagemagick-tools, finally? This way packages could specify whether they depend on the tools and/or the library instead of playing the confusing and lengthy || ( ... ) game. Moreover, in this way one could easily also introduce media-gfx/imagemagick[tools] (and maybe rename the confusing media-gfx/graphicsmagick[imagamagick] into media-gfx/graphicsmagick[tools]) to allow the user to decide whether he wants the tools from imagemagick or graphicsmagick (as I understood, some users might prefer the latter which is currently impossible). Last but not least, users who need only the libraries (because some program depends on it) are not forced to install the tools at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ExecutorElassus
Veteran
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 1435
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a way to search for any package that requires a dependency with a specific USE flag? I emerged an ebuild a couple weeks ago that explicitly required graphicsmagick with USE="imagemagick" set, which conflicts with a lot of other packages. But now, when I'm running 'emerge -uD world', I'm being told that imagemagick is blocking graphicsmagick, likely for this reason. I'd like to be able to find out which package that was so I can file a bug or something, because having to set/unset that USE back and forth seems somewhat … inefficient.
Cheers,
EE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nick87720z
n00b
Joined: 22 Mar 2017
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Several years ago i made unsuccessful attempt to completely replace imagemagick with graphicsmagick[imagemagick], unless discovered direct dependencies on IM in some packages. There is similar actual problem, but with some ebuilds, depending directly on media-sound/jack-audio-connection-kit instead of virtual/jack. As for jack issue, while moving to virtual/jack in progress, working solution here is to just write media-sound/jack-audio-connection-kit into packages.provided.
I think, i'm ready to do same for imagemagick, but i'm not sure, is it good idea. I have seen bug report for GM:
https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2017/09/06/graphicsmagick-memory-allocation-failure-in-magickmalloc-memory-c-2/
Does anyone know better, how IM and GM are compared by stability?
Is it ok to just replace IM with GM (of course, with later recompilation of all dependents)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ExecutorElassus
Veteran
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 1435
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| nick, see a couple posts up. According to the dev, 2/3 of the dependencies are for libraries, which don't match between IM and GM at all. So I don't think you could completely remove IM from your system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nick87720z
n00b
Joined: 22 Mar 2017
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, i did not even notice that, sorry. Thanks for reply.
| Quote: | | Only 1/3 of the reverse dependencies use the tools, rest use the libraries which don't match at all. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
beandog
Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 2072
Location: /usa/utah
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 7:11 am Post subject: Re: GraphicsMagick conflicts with ImageMagick? |
|
|
| sgarcia wrote: | | The current GraphicsMagick page says, "GM does not does not conflict with other installed software." That's pretty vague, but it supports the notion that they should be able to coexist. |
ImageMagick installs binaries like mogrify, convert, etc., but with GraphicsMagick, there is just one binary, "gm" and you run the same commands with that as a prefix.
_________________
If it ain't broke, tweak it. dvds | blurays | blog | wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Multimedia
