View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
taskara Advocate
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 3763 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 7:51 am Post subject: stable kernel 2.4.19 |
|
|
anyone tried latest stable kernel, 2.4.19 ? (released today 3rd August 2002) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taskara Advocate
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 3763 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
from the changelog:
"2.4.19-rc5 was released as 2.4.19 with no changes."
will "gentoo-sources" be based on this new kernel, and will it need all those little patches ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ferdy Retired Dev
Joined: 04 May 2002 Posts: 483 Location: España
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think I'll use it with my new 1.3b instalation. Then I'll maybe use it in my "stable" Gentoo..... and who knows if one day I put it into my server
Just my 2 cents _________________ Paludis, the next generation in package mangling. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rommel Veteran
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 1145 Location: Williamsburg Virginia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2002 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i emerged it last night adn its running fine....added support for usb2.0 and there were some other minor changes but nothing like the heavily patched gentoo kernels...but seems i always have trouble with them so i use the vanilla |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taskara Advocate
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 3763 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2002 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, often the vanilla-sources are the way to go
anyone know how long till the gentoo-sources will be released based on 2.4.19 ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Evangelion Veteran
Joined: 31 May 2002 Posts: 1087 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
What version does the Gentoo-kernel use? I forgot *cough* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dolio l33t
Joined: 17 Jun 2002 Posts: 650
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you look in the ebuild, you'll find that the gentoo sources are:
2.4.19-pre7-ac2
+ SGI XFS 1.1
+ grsecurity-1.9.4
+ 2.4.19-pre7-low-latency
+ QoS support
+ preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-ac2-1
+ preempt-stats-rml-2.4.19-pre7-ac3-1
+ some stuff with cryptic names (jp10 looks like?)
+ more cryptic stuff (address-space-4)
+ acpi
+ jiffies-for-i386, mmx-init, p4-xeon, x86-fast-pte, acpi-lowerlatency-3, acpi-pciirq-18, acpi-y2k-1
+ new SiS Athlon chipset support
+ IBM evm 1.0.1
+ some 2.4.18-wolk3.4-rc5 stuff
+ ACPI marked DANGEROUS and JFS support
+ vfat symlink patch, CDDA dma patch from mjc's collection
Quite a mouthfull. _________________ They don't have a good bathroom to do coke in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Evangelion Veteran
Joined: 31 May 2002 Posts: 1087 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dolio wrote: | If you look in the ebuild, you'll find that the gentoo sources are: |
Thanks . I can't yet look in to the ebuild, since I'm not yet running Gentoo . But I will install it in near future. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taskara Advocate
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 3763 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
currently, the "gentoo-sources" is a heavily patched 2.4.18 kernel.
now that 2.4.19 has been released, hopefully we'll see an update to 2.4.19 for "gentoo-sources" soon.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
format c: Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 89 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use the 2.4.19 since release and think it's faster than the gentoo-patched. Is there a way to check it out? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
taskara Advocate
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 3763 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 07, 2002 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you can do a hdparm test on your hdd's
or just time how long it takes to do things. like open mozilla, or something. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Locke n00b
Joined: 02 Aug 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Baton Rouge, LA, US
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I snatched the 2.4.19 source from kernel.org and applied the latest XFS patch. Seems to be working well |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlterEgo Veteran
Joined: 25 Apr 2002 Posts: 1619
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.4.19 is running fine here plus pre-empt-patch/lm_sensors/Alsa/Nvidia.
USB for mice/keyboards has slightly changed: you need CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT=y enabled (hid input layer) for your mouse/keyboard to work.
I find it slightly slower than 2.4.18 in hdparm -tT scores and in
LD_DEBUG=statistics konqueror scores as well.
(Tbird 800 KT133 ATA100 disks) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
format c: Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 89 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is my harddrive to slow? hdparm -t -T results always the same after reboot:
vanilla-2.4.19, gentoo-patched-2.4.19 or FreeS/WAN-patched-2.4.18 with debian sid.
128 MB in 0.8 seconds = 160.00 MB/sec
64 MB in 1.59 seconds = 40.25 MB/sec |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sequentious Apprentice
Joined: 07 Jun 2002 Posts: 290 Location: London Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2002 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heres what I got, it appears to be more or less on-par i believe (maxtor 60 gig ata100)
Code: | #hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.69 seconds =185.51 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.02 seconds = 31.68 MB/sec |
Read through this thread for some more info (what I learned anyway). https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=51&highlight=hdparm _________________ --
Chris I
chris@cidesign.ca :: www.cidesign.ca/~chris/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|