View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KillerX Retired Dev
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 12 Location: India
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:48 am Post subject: [NEWS] April GMN |
|
|
This thread is for discussion of the April issue of the Gentoo Monthly Newsletter. We hope you enjoyed reading it!
If you liked a certain article or felt that the GMN was published with something that we could do without, let us know. You can also put your comments and suggestions on how you think the next GMN should be. _________________ Anant
http://www.kix.in/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rgk Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 140 Location: ny
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
i don't see it on the front page
edit: now its there _________________ MadGizmo.com is awesome.
Last edited by rgk on Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:51 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mark_alec Bodhisattva
Joined: 11 Sep 2004 Posts: 6066 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
rgk wrote: | i don't see it on the front page | Refresh. _________________ www.gentoo.org.au || #gentoo-au |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ABCDwp Retired Dev
Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
The newsletter says that the next bugday will be (Monday) 5 May, but the linked page says that it will be (Saturday) 3 May. Which is correct? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KillerX Retired Dev
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 12 Location: India
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
ABCDwp wrote: | The newsletter says that the next bugday will be (Monday) 5 May, but the linked page says that it will be (Saturday) 3 May. Which is correct? |
May 03 is correct. The GMN has been corrected and the change should appear shortly. _________________ Anant
http://www.kix.in/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rhoberma n00b
Joined: 24 May 2003 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:19 am Post subject: April Edition |
|
|
I love the new graphs - makes it really easy to get a sense of what is happening. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swimmer Veteran
Joined: 15 Jul 2002 Posts: 1330 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wonderful interview with Ramon van Alteren! I loved to read about a Gentoo Server Park in a high profile live environment! I never dared to propagate that when I was still working in IT
Greetz
swimmer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maggu2810 n00b
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 20
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
swimmer Veteran
Joined: 15 Jul 2002 Posts: 1330 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh - and there is an error in Listing 4.3 - it should be and not Quote: | rc-default default | ...
Greetz
swimmer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:18 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maggu2810 n00b
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | Those quotes are all 5 years old. Things change. |
I know, but I never read something else about the nomenclature. So I thought testing is keyword masked and unstable could be hard masked.
Is there an 'official' statement that determines the 'official' names? _________________ --- sorry for the bad english --- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColdWind Retired Dev
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 Posts: 119 Location: Valencia, Spain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maggu2810 wrote: | nightmorph wrote: | Those quotes are all 5 years old. Things change. |
I know, but I never read something else about the nomenclature. So I thought testing is keyword masked and unstable could be hard masked.
Is there an 'official' statement that determines the 'official' names? |
AFAIK, hard masked ebuilds are not "unstable", they are "not supported for end-users". Debian's testing and unstable concepts doesn't apply to Gentoo. If you unmask all hard masked packages you won't get the equivalent to Debian's unstable... you'll get a screwed system.
Call ~arch testing or unstable (who cares?) but the set of package.mask'ed packages is not the unstable "branch". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
renrutal Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 135 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What charting software do you use to make the graphs for the GMN? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timeBandit Bodhisattva
Joined: 31 Dec 2004 Posts: 2719 Location: here, there or in transit
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
renrutal wrote: | What charting software do you use to make the graphs for the GMN? | Asked & answered. _________________ Plants are pithy, brooks tend to babble--I'm content to lie between them.
Super-short f.g.o checklist: Search first, strip comments, mark solved, help others. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rgk Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 140 Location: ny
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah i see you guys added my irssi + bitlbee tip
thanks _________________ MadGizmo.com is awesome. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rogerx Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would enjoy the interviews done using audio instead of transcript only (ie. Convert "Heard in the Community" into LinuxCrazy format which also posts the transcripts. The "Heard in the Community" has a great interview format -- For instance, highlighting developers' favorites applications, etc!).
Hey, just call it "Gentoo Radio" _________________ Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paapaa l33t
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 Posts: 955 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:28 am Post subject: Re: [NEWS] April GMN |
|
|
KillerX wrote: | This thread is for discussion of the April issue of the Gentoo Monthly Newsletter. We hope you enjoyed reading it! |
Great job, guys and gils! But you always forget this important thing: always put a link to the article/newsletter in these discussion threads. In the first post.
Thanks _________________ Paludis, the way packages are meant to be managed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TRauMa n00b
Joined: 26 Nov 2002 Posts: 43 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
The GWN in the new format really is nice, and I like the graphs, too. Great job! _________________ *sigfault* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twstd3bc Apprentice
Joined: 07 Feb 2003 Posts: 289 Location: Los Angeles, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a VERY NICE Newsletter! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rogerx Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 118
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The first half of the interview, the interviewer was strict with questions. Second half, tended to relax a little and actually hold a discussion with whom he was interviewing.
Relax... it's not like like you're interrogating a hostage. Have a discussion. (If you have to, pretend you're talking to a beautiful naked girl ...ok, maybe not such a great idea...
BTW: I never knew Spanky was such a swell sounding guy! I'm shocked. _________________ Roger
http://rogerx.freeshell.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
ColdWind wrote: | maggu2810 wrote: | I thought testing is keyword masked and unstable could be hard masked.
Is there an 'official' statement that determines the 'official' names? |
AFAIK, hard masked ebuilds are not "unstable", they are "not supported for end-users". Debian's testing and unstable concepts doesn't apply to Gentoo. If you unmask all hard masked packages you won't get the equivalent to Debian's unstable... you'll get a screwed system.
Call ~arch testing or unstable (who cares?) but the set of package.mask'ed packages is not the unstable "branch". |
Historically it's stable and unstable in gentoo, and hard masked are "known to break". Nowadays, with all the overlays, I'd call ~arch the equivalent of debian testing, and overlays the new unstable (hope I've got those the right way round.) Newer stuff tends to come in via overlays (unless it's based on a long-standing project, which might still be worked on in an unofficial overlay) where most of the interesting stuff happens if you follow the code; ~arch in that context is much more of a QA stage than it used to be.
This is prob'y why many think Gentoo's no longer bleeding-edge: ~arch used to be much more so than it is now, and people think it has to be in the main tree to count as Gentoo. That stuff now happens in overlays which are an excellent way to organise things imo, since you simply add the overlay for the area you're interested in (eg pro-audio or haskell) and there's usually an IRC room where you can feedback to the devs.
I guess unstable would really be the sunrise overlay. It'd be nice if there were a bit more control over how stuff gets pulled in, eg if we could say "pull in foo and its deps from sunrise and main only" without all the other stuff being considered. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|