View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fghellar Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 856 Location: Porto Alegre, BR
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 7:29 am Post subject: Important bugfixes in portage-2.0.11 |
|
|
Daniel Robbins wrote: | [gentoo-dev] Portage: good news and bad news
Hi Devs:
Bad news: I found a significant bug in Portage 2.0.10 and earlier that
could cause masking to work improperly, particularly if a package has a
~ entry in the profile's packages file.
Good news: I've fixed the problem in Portage 2.0.11 by rewriting
portage.py's portdbapi xmatch() and visible() methods. This has
resulted in a 44% speed-up in dependency calculations over Portage
2.0.10. If you thought things were fast before...
More good news: I've improved repoman to differentiate between
user-visible ebuilds with bad dependencies and masked ebuilds with bad
dependencies. When checking dependencies, user-visible ebuilds'
dependencies are only matched against user-visible ebuilds. But when
masked ebuilds are checked, deps are satisfied using *all* available
ebuilds. This should eliminate virtually all false positives in the
repoman DEPEND and RDEPEND QA tests. Type "repoman --help" for more
information on these new changes.
Enjoy!
--
Daniel Robbins
Chief Architect, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org |
Mailing list link: http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/2002-July/013444.html _________________ | www.gentoo.org | www.tldp.org | www.google.com | |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klavs Guru
Joined: 22 May 2002 Posts: 536 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's great.. but cvs on cvs.gentoo.org seems to be DOWN
# emerge rsync
>>> starting rsync with rsync://cvs.gentoo.org/gentoo-x86-portage...
rsync: failed to connect to cvs.gentoo.org: Connection refused
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(97) _________________ Best regards,
Klavs Klavsen
Denmark
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent.
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child
who is carrying a .38. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DArtagnan l33t
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 942 Location: Israel, Jerusalem
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Klavs wrote: | That's great.. but cvs on cvs.gentoo.org seems to be DOWN
# emerge rsync
>>> starting rsync with rsync://cvs.gentoo.org/gentoo-x86-portage...
rsync: failed to connect to cvs.gentoo.org: Connection refused
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(97) |
Is not , this method was blocked for rsync! _________________ All for one and one for All
--
MACPRO machine... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klavs Guru
Joined: 22 May 2002 Posts: 536 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why? And how do I go about getting the new portage ebuild? it's not on any of the mirrors, that I've checked. _________________ Best regards,
Klavs Klavsen
Denmark
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent.
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child
who is carrying a .38. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DArtagnan l33t
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 942 Location: Israel, Jerusalem
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Klavs wrote: | That's great.. but cvs on cvs.gentoo.org seems to be DOWN
# emerge rsync
>>> starting rsync with rsync://cvs.gentoo.org/gentoo-x86-portage...
rsync: failed to connect to cvs.gentoo.org: Connection refused
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(97) |
do it so:
#nano -w /etc/make.conf
In this file instead of "rsync://cvs.gentoo.org/gentoo-x86-portage"
enter rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
( save the file and exit )
#emerge rsync
Good luck _________________ All for one and one for All
--
MACPRO machine... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klavs Guru
Joined: 22 May 2002 Posts: 536 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That worked.great. where and when was this change of rsync advertised? is it me whose just slow or?
Now I got some updates, but portage is still only v2.0.10 - anybody got v2.0.11? _________________ Best regards,
Klavs Klavsen
Denmark
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent.
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child
who is carrying a .38. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DArtagnan l33t
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 942 Location: Israel, Jerusalem
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have no idea about portage2.0.11 but the change of rsync address was made long time ago... _________________ All for one and one for All
--
MACPRO machine... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fghellar Bodhisattva
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 856 Location: Porto Alegre, BR
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Klavs Guru
Joined: 22 May 2002 Posts: 536 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My Gentoo install isn't two months old
I'm using Gentoo-1.3a test iso for gcc-3.1
guess it wasn't updated, and it has worked until yesterday.
But I do keep an eye on news.
Tnx. Any of you got the 2.0.11 ebuild? _________________ Best regards,
Klavs Klavsen
Denmark
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent.
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child
who is carrying a .38. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2002 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I installed something that updated my make files.
I missed that line with diff... all better now
Still no 2.0.11 though. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iKiddo Guru
Joined: 27 Jun 2002 Posts: 341 Location: Europe?
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure if you not already know, but apparently Portage 2.0.11 is available, I got it yesterdayevening (time region amsterdam ) when I did an emerge -pu world. Everything seems working here . Thought you might want to know... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iKiddo wrote: | Not sure if you not already know, but apparently Portage 2.0.11 is available |
Um...thanks, but wasn't that the point of the original post? (entitled, "Important bugfixes in portage-2.0.11")
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scandium Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 340 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
klieber wrote: | iKiddo wrote: | Not sure if you not already know, but apparently Portage 2.0.11 is available |
Um...thanks, but wasn't that the point of the original post? (entitled, "Important bugfixes in portage-2.0.11")
--kurt |
lol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daos n00b
Joined: 18 Apr 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Virginia, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I upgraded portage from 2.0.10 to 2.0.11 yesterday. I found out it has 1 bug:
emerge -b portage does not generate the .tbz2 for 2.0.11.
The -b option works for other packages, it does not work for portage itself.
Version 2.0.10 does not have this problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
klieber wrote: | iKiddo wrote: | Not sure if you not already know, but apparently Portage 2.0.11 is available |
Um...thanks, but wasn't that the point of the original post? (entitled, "Important bugfixes in portage-2.0.11")
--kurt | What is the trick to finding it? I have it now, but not when I made my previous post in this thread. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kanuslupus wrote: | What is the trick to finding it? |
I think part of it has to do with what rsync server you hit and how fast it updates. rsync servers are supposed to update every 30 minutes with the master server, but some may not follow that schedule as religiously.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 4:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
klieber wrote: | I think part of it has to do with what rsync server you hit and how fast it updates. rsync servers are supposed to update every 30 minutes with the master server, but some may not follow that schedule as religiously.
--kurt | Heathens... repent! repent! _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jean-michel Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 142 Location: Somewhere East of the Atlantic
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2002 7:19 pm Post subject: Still having portage problems with clean install -> 2.0.1 |
|
|
The following problem arises with portage 2.0.11, off of a clean build from a 1.2 iso:
Code: |
# emerge -up system
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
Calculating system dependencies -
!!! Error: couldn't find match for sys-devel/ld.so in update (likely old /var/db/pkg entry)
|
Where the hell does ld.so come from, and does anyone know how I fix this? Note this is a clean, fresh install of Gentoo, to which has only been added some local ebuild categories with the following script:
Code: |
KCCO_SECTION_LIST="kcco-3rdParty kcco-admin kcco-apps kcco-libs kcco-tablet"
[ ...]
# clean out old stuff
for n in ${KCCO_SECTION_LIST}; do rm -rf /usr/portage/$n ; done
emerge --clean rsync
#
# copy over kcco ebuilds
#
rsync -aCzv rsync://${KCCO_EBUILD_HOST}${KCCO_EBUILD_DIR} /usr/portage
# now, fix categories file
for n in ${KCCO_SECTION_LIST}
do echo "$n" >> /usr/portage/profiles/categories
done
|
This misbehavior began somewhere early in the portage 2.0.x releases, and persists in 2.0.11. Any help would be greatly appreciated. _________________ The Struggle for the Future of Human Evolution Begins: Autonomy the SciFi Series! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scandium Retired Dev
Joined: 22 Apr 2002 Posts: 340 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2.0.12 closed quite many bugs, too !
(emerge --help rsync now really helps, and doesn't sync etc. etc.)
works quite well here...
But as in another thread I see that there is a .so failure related to gcc....doesn't happen to me (yet)... well
Last edited by Scandium on Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
klieber Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 3657 Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2002 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The recent portage problems seem to have quieted down quite a bit. While there are still one or two people having problems, the majority of folks seem to be happy with 2.0.11
unsticking thread.
--kurt _________________ The problem with political jokes is that they get elected |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|