View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
gringo Advocate
Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 2:31 pm Post subject: radeon 9500 |
|
|
I have just read several posts about the problems with 3d rendering and X with my new radeon 9500, but now i am really confused:
- Ati- drivers from portage has no support for xfree 4.3, right? or have anyone more news referring this?
- but also the ati-drivers from portage says it supports r300 models. Isn´t this the radeon 9500??
- I have seen drivers for xfree 4.3.0 here:
http://www.schneider-digital.de/html/download_ati.html and as can be read in the readme it has support for several radeons, included mine 9500.
Any help?
thanx & greetz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dberkholz Retired Dev
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 1008 Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ati-drivers in portage supports your card and your xfree version. They are the drivers found at Schneider Digital installed by an ebuild. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gringo Advocate
Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
great news!!!
thanks for clearing this |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dberkholz Retired Dev
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 1008 Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you wait a couple of hours, you can sync and get 2.9.13 instead of 2.9.12. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jpc82 Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2003 Posts: 326
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm trying to get the radeon drivers to work with my system also, but I'm getting an error I can't fix.
I emerged xfree-drm, and ati-drivers (2.9.12), but when I run modprobe radeon I get
radeon 109828 0 (unused)
why is this happening?
my system:
Abit NF7-S
2x256PC3200 ram
ATI 9500Pro
EDIT: I'm using gs-sources with nforce2 agpgart compiled in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dberkholz Retired Dev
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Posts: 1008 Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gringo Advocate
Joined: 27 Apr 2003 Posts: 3793
|
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I´m not 100% about this but if the module appears as unused it´s because you are not running X. load x and have a lokk again to the module.
greetz! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|