Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
OpenOffice.org 2.0.0 final released
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
suka
Developer
Developer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 383

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wangxiaohu wrote:

Yes, it does not open up a help window.


Actually the ebuild warns at the beginning of the build-process about that ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simon_irl
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 403
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

suka wrote:
wangxiaohu wrote:

Yes, it does not open up a help window.


Actually the ebuild warns at the beginning of the build-process about that ;)

i missed that. did it warn that java would need to be enabled in order for help to display? is no help the only consequence of not enabling java?

i don't have -java in my USE flags, but i don't have java in there either. i guess if i enable java and set it compiling overnight again (that's why i missed the warning the first time) i'll have help...not a huge big deal, but it would be nice. are there any negative side-effects? if enabling java will slow down launch time or whatever, then i'll leave it without help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phsdv
Guru
Guru


Joined: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 372
Location: Europe

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

VStrider wrote:
How's that for compile time? :mrgreen:
Code:
$genlop -i openoffice
  Total builds: 1
   Global build time: 15 hours, 16 minutes and 30 seconds.

   Info about currently installed ebuild:

   * app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
   Install date: Fri Oct 21 20:07:19 2005
   USE="curl eds gnome java python zlib xml2 -kde -ldap -mozilla -nas"
   CFLAGS="-march=athlon-tbird -O2 -pipe"

I probably hold the record for the longest OOo2 compile. Beat that! :P
(Athlon thunderbird 1.1Ghz, 512Mb RAM)

you asked for it, I beat you :twisted:
Code:
# genlop -ti openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Sun Oct 23 04:32:02 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
       merge time: 15 hours, 59 minutes and 39 seconds.

   Total builds: 1
   Global build time: 15 hours, 59 minutes and 39 seconds.

   Info about currently installed ebuild:

   * app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
   Install date: Sun Oct 23 04:32:02 2005
   USE="curl eds gnome mozilla zlib xml2 -java -kde -ldap -nas"
   CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -fforce-addr -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -pipe"
Porbably the -java saved me some compile time, otherwise I do not understand the small difference between my 733 MHz PIII and yours 1.1GHz athelon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sundiver2k
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Feb 2003
Posts: 37
Location: Chattanooga, TN

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tried to emerge OO, and I got this error

Quote:

/usr/share/aclocal/ao.m4:9: warning: underquoted definition of XIPH_PATH_AO
/usr/share/aclocal/ORBit.m4:4: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_ORBIT
configure:23538: error: possibly undefined macro: PKG_CONFIG_MIN_VERSION
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation.

!!! ERROR: gnome-base/libgnome-2.12.0.1 failed.
!!! Function src_unpack, Line 46, Exitcode 1
!!! autoconf failed
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.



I've looked around a bit, and I've yet to see anyone with this error. Any ideas??

**** Edit by Sundiver2k*****

I edited the ebuild and commented out the esound patch, and it appears to be rolling along again. Hopefully, I'll be running the new OO in a few hours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VStrider
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 244
Location: 1 to Rule All way, Moria Gate, Middle Earth, SAU 70N

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

phsdv wrote:
you asked for it, I beat you :twisted:
merge time: 15 hours, 59 minutes and 39 seconds.

Porbably the -java saved me some compile time, otherwise I do not understand the small difference between my 733 MHz PIII and yours 1.1GHz athelon.

Hahaha, nicely done! :mrgreen:

Yeah, probably the -java flag saved you some time. You could be looking at an awesome 20 hours compile time. :mrgreen:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shead
n00b
n00b


Joined: 23 Oct 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Yeah, probably the -java flag saved you some time. You could be looking at an awesome 20 hours compile time. :mrgreen:


You mean like this?

Code:

shead@dandelo ~ $ genlop -ti openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Wed Jul 20 19:05:14 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.4-r1
       merge time: 21 hours, 3 minutes and 27 seconds.

     Fri Sep 23 02:07:58 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-1.1.5
       merge time: 21 hours, 1 minute and 14 seconds.

     Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
       merge time: 19 hours, 35 minutes and 15 seconds.


   Total builds: 3
   Global build time: 2 days, 13 hours, 39 minutes and 56 seconds.
   Average merge time: 20 hours, 33 minutes and 18 seconds.

   Info about currently installed ebuild:

   * app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
   Install date: Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005
   USE="curl eds python zlib xml2 -gnome -java -kde -ldap -mozilla -nas"
   CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -ffast-math"
shead@dandelo ~ $ uname -a
Linux dandelo 2.6.13-gentoo #3 Mon Sep 26 18:45:11 MDT 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux


If I had +java I could have definitely hit 21 hours on 2.0. Strange that mine is 5 hours slower when I have a AMD 2000+ and 512 MB of RAM?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VStrider
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 244
Location: 1 to Rule All way, Moria Gate, Middle Earth, SAU 70N

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shead wrote:

You mean like this?
Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 19 hours, 35 minutes and 15 seconds.

* app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
Install date: Sat Oct 22 13:45:25 2005
USE="curl eds python zlib xml2 -gnome -java -kde -ldap -mozilla -nas"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -ffast-math"

If I had +java I could have definitely hit 21 hours on 2.0. Strange that mine is 5 hours slower when I have a AMD 2000+ and 512 MB of RAM?

Yeah, that's definitelly strange. Your machine should be alot faster. Maybe -ffast-math slows your system down?

Redhat Magazine - Performance Tuning with GCC, Part 1, Part 2 wrote:
In most cases, obtaining the very last nanosecond of performance is not terribly important. Optimization follows a distinct curve of diminishing returns. Most applications will thrive with the default transformations done at -O2, and since some of the more esoteric flags are seldom used, your code may behave erratically because of latent bugs in your application (for example, the code may be violating language aliasing rules). Though, sometimes the bug may be in the compiler itself. If the speedup is not measurable or insignificant, it may not be worth the pain.

An even bigger problem is the interactions between optimizing transformations. It is not uncommon for different optimizations to interfere or even cancel each other out, so by combining many different flags, you may be causing more harm than good.

One fundamental fact to always keep in mind when tuning for performance is that compiler optimization is not a silver bullet. Blindly adding different optimization flags hoping for some black magic to make your program faster is usually a recipe for frustration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simon_irl
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 403
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok...recompiled (6 hours 20 minutes) with java and now the help works.

one thing that really annoys me is that the splash screen can no longer be disabled...or at least, on my system when i attempt to do so it replaces the splash screen with an enormous grey box. i can't find this issue in bugzilla...does it happen for anyone else?

to (attempt to) disable the splash screen, edit /usr/lib/openoffice/program/sofficerc so that Logo=0.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M.Pomme
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 2:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinr wrote:
sandcrawler wrote:
Actually, the question might be... how long will it take for me to find out this doesn't work....

Or better still how long will it take to load after it is installed? In my case it takes whooping great 1min 20secs from when I click writer on the kde menu untill writer actually appears. That on an AMD 64 2800 with 512Mb of ram and a SATA hardisk. That time is unacceptable!
Edit: Just got that startup time down to 3 seconds :lol: by pointing to java in the options


I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :

Code:
qjavaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!


And when checking in the tools->options->java, no jre appears. I tried to add one by pointing directly to the jre directory, but it always makes a message box popup telling me that no jre was found in the directory.

Any idea ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kyro
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Dec 2002
Posts: 56
Location: Over here

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

M.Pomme wrote:

I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :

<snip>
Any idea ?


Sure:

1. Open up /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice with your favorite editor, find the following block:
Code:

# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us
if [ -x "$sd_prog/javaldx" ] ; then
    java_ld_library_path=`"$sd_prog/javaldx"`
    if [ "$java_ld_library_path" != "" ] ; then
        case $sd_platform in
            AIX)
                LIBPATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${LIBPATH}
                ;;
            Darwin)
                DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH}
                ;;
            HP-UX)
                SHLIB_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${SHLIB_PATH}
                ;;
            IRIX*)
                LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH}
                ;;
            *)
                LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${java_ld_library_path}:${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
                ;;
        esac
    fi
fi

2. Comment it out and put in (this is for sun-jdk-bin-1.5.0.05 on my system (note that it points to jre/lib/, not just jre/)):
Code:
java_ld_library_path="/usr/local/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05/jre/lib/"

3. Start OpenOffice, go to Options->Java, check the box so that your JRE actually gets used, then restart.
4. With some luck, that should be it.

Still can't wait for OO.org 2.0.2 to arrive though, so us x86_64-people can actually compile the thing ourselves.
_________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alinv
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 395
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two questions before I start compiling it:

1. Does anybody have a success story on OO compiled with gcc4?
2. How high can I set -j? (I'd like to use distcc for this, my machine is not that powerful)

Thanks,
Alin
_________________
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
S.B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M.Pomme
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kyro wrote:
M.Pomme wrote:

I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :

<snip>
Any idea ?


Sure:

1. Open up /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice with your favorite editor, find the following block:
Code:

# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us
if [ -x "$sd_prog/javaldx" ] ; then
    java_ld_library_path=`"$sd_prog/javaldx"`
    if [ "$java_ld_library_path" != "" ] ; then
        case $sd_platform in
<snip>
        esac
    fi
fi

2. Comment it out and put in (this is for sun-jdk-bin-1.5.0.05 on my system (note that it points to jre/lib/, not just jre/)):
Code:
java_ld_library_path="/usr/local/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05/jre/lib/"

3. Start OpenOffice, go to Options->Java, check the box so that your JRE actually gets used, then restart.
4. With some luck, that should be it.

Still can't wait for OO.org 2.0.2 to arrive though, so us x86_64-people can actually compile the thing ourselves.


Thanks, removing the call to javaldx saved me most of the start-up time which is now reasonnable. However, no jre is detected althought I tried to point java_ld_library_path to various valid directories, and to add JREs manually using the "add" button in the java option panel. Well, i don't really mind, since specifying a jre only allows features (namely embedded java applets) I don't have a use for yet, but it's weird.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
qupada
n00b
n00b


Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M.Pomme wrote:
Kyro wrote:
M.Pomme wrote:

I would like to get this trick working on my amd64 system too .. right now i need about 4 minutes for openoffice to launch ... I have blackdown-jre-1.4 installed (and the jdk also btw), and also sun-jre-bin-1.5, but while launching, ooffice2 outputs :

<snip>
Any idea ?


Sure:

1. Open up /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/soffice with your favorite editor, find the following block:
Code:

# extend the ld_library_path for java: javaldx checks the sofficerc for us
if [ -x "$sd_prog/javaldx" ] ; then
    java_ld_library_path=`"$sd_prog/javaldx"`
    if [ "$java_ld_library_path" != "" ] ; then
        case $sd_platform in
<snip>
        esac
    fi
fi

2. Comment it out and put in (this is for sun-jdk-bin-1.5.0.05 on my system (note that it points to jre/lib/, not just jre/)):
Code:
java_ld_library_path="/usr/local/sun-jdk-1.5.0.05/jre/lib/"

3. Start OpenOffice, go to Options->Java, check the box so that your JRE actually gets used, then restart.
4. With some luck, that should be it.

Still can't wait for OO.org 2.0.2 to arrive though, so us x86_64-people can actually compile the thing ourselves.


Thanks, removing the call to javaldx saved me most of the start-up time which is now reasonnable. However, no jre is detected althought I tried to point java_ld_library_path to various valid directories, and to add JREs manually using the "add" button in the java option panel. Well, i don't really mind, since specifying a jre only allows features (namely embedded java applets) I don't have a use for yet, but it's weird.



I think for openoffice-bin you need a 32 bit jre.
I used the same one (sun jre v1.5.0_04) that i downloaded for the purpose of java applets in firefox-bin (per this tutorial: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_firefox_with_flash_and_java_on_amd64), OpenOffice found it fine with use of the add button in the preferences.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
effloresce
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 109

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, I've read the whole thread and I'm still confused on whether Oo2 will use the gtk icons (emerging from source with +gtk of course) or not.

I don't want to have to unmerge ximian-openoffice, and then after hours of emerging OO2 end up with some weird icons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alinv
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Nov 2002
Posts: 395
Location: Bucharest

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

effloresce wrote:
I don't want to have to unmerge ximian-openoffice, and then after hours of emerging OO2 end up with some weird icons.

You can package ximian-openoffice with quickpkg and if something goes wrong, you can emerge the binary, without compiling it again.
_________________
Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.
S.B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
simon_irl
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 403
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

effloresce wrote:
Okay, I've read the whole thread and I'm still confused on whether Oo2 will use the gtk icons (emerging from source with +gtk of course) or not.

yes...the build in portage (of openoffice 2) works just like openoffice-ximian with regard to user interface (or at least, it does on my gtk/gnome system...i can't speak for kde integration but assume that works too).

in fact, i think it's a bit better than before, although i'm not sure. but from memory, openoffice-ximian used gnomish icons and responded to colour changes in gtk theme settings...but the integration was fairly superficial...i don't remember the widgets changing significantly (shape etc.) whereas they do now. on the other hand, the dialogs are still clearly openoffice dialogs with gnomish icons (rather than proper gnome dialogs), and different icon sets aren't picked up by openoffice.

still, if your gtk theme is not too unusual, openoffice 2 will fit in nicely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jedaih
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

alinv wrote:


1. Does anybody have a success story on OO compiled with gcc4?


Yes, i have installed OpenOffice.org 2, compiled with gcc 4.0.2

Code:

 app-office/openoffice-2.0.0
merge time: 8 hours, 33 minutes and 51 seconds


My system is
Code:

Linux highwaystar 2.6.13-gentoo-r2 #1 Mon Oct 3 23:42:44 CLST 2005 i686 AMD Sempron(tm) 2500+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux


And Flags used in this compilation
Code:

"-march=athlon-xp -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -pipe -fvisibility-inlines-hidden"


greetings from Chile :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BeastOfBurden
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:00 pm    Post subject: I think I win. Reply with quote

On a Pentium II 300MHz with 278MB RAM:

% time emerge openoffice

<much, much later>

real 3688m29.632s
user 2873m39.232s
sys 411m32.363s

Yes, I run Gentoo as a desktop on a PII 300.
Yes, I installed from Stage 1.
Yes, I am a cheap masochist. ;-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xake
Guru
Guru


Joined: 11 Feb 2004
Posts: 588
Location: Göteborg, the rainy part of scandinavia

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, sorry. While I have not yet tried to emerge openoffice (it seems like it is problem with it and modular xorg) i have this little fella...;)

Code:
# genlop -t openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Sun Oct 16 09:09:50 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2
       merge time: 1 day, 21 hours, 37 minutes and 30 seconds.


You guys just don't want to know what I did to this computer while emerging that thing...;) It is a P42.8 safely clocked to 3.0 using gcc-4.0.2 if you wanted to know....:-P
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q-collective
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 22 Mar 2004
Posts: 2056

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xake wrote:
Ok, sorry. While I have not yet tried to emerge openoffice (it seems like it is problem with it and modular xorg) i have this little fella...;)

Code:
# genlop -t openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Sun Oct 16 09:09:50 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2
       merge time: 1 day, 21 hours, 37 minutes and 30 seconds.


You guys just don't want to know what I did to this computer while emerging that thing...;) It is a P42.8 safely clocked to 3.0 using gcc-4.0.2 if you wanted to know....:-P

Wtf, that should be way faster. Think like 4 hours 8O
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NewbieTim
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

a.forlorn wrote:
How can I get rid off all these dependencies?

Code:
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -vp openoffice

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild  N    ] app-crypt/opencdk-0.5.7  -doc 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/libtasn1-0.2.13  -doc 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/lzo-1.08-r1  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] net-libs/gnutls-1.2.4  +crypt -doc +zlib 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] net-libs/libsoup-2.2.6.1  -debug -doc +ssl -static 0 kB
[ebuild     U ] dev-libs/glib-2.8.3 [2.6.5] -debug -doc -hardened 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-libs/cairo-1.0.2  +X -doc -glitz +png 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-libs/pango-1.10.1  -debug -doc 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/atk-1.10.3  -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-misc/shared-mime-info-0.16  0 kB
[ebuild  NS   ] x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.6  -debug -doc +jpeg +tiff 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libglade-2.5.1  -debug -doc 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/libIDL-0.8.6  -debug -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/orbit-2.12.4  -debug -doc +ssl -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.10.1  -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gconf-2.12.0  -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-mime-data-2.4.2  -debug 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.12.1.1  -debug -doc -gnutls -hal -howl +ipv6 -samba +ssl 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libgnome-2.12.0.1  -debug -doc -esd -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/nspr-4.4.1-r2  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-libs/nss-3.9.2-r3  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.12.0  +X -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.10.1-r1  +X -debug -doc -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/gnome-keyring-0.4.5  -debug 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.12.0  -debug -doc +jpeg -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] gnome-extra/evolution-data-server-1.4.1  -debug -doc +ipv6 -kerberos -krb4 -ldap -mozilla -nntp +ssl -static 0 kB
[ebuild     U ] dev-util/pkgconfig-0.19 [0.17.2-r1] -hardened 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-themes/hicolor-icon-theme-0.8  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme-2.12.1  -debug 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-themes/gtk-engines-2.6.5  -accessibility -debug -static 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-themes/gnome-themes-2.12.1  -accessibility -debug 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] x11-libs/startup-notification-0.8  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-perl/Compress-Zlib-1.35  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-perl/Archive-Zip-1.16  0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] dev-java/ant-core-1.6.5-r2  -doc -source 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] app-shells/tcsh-6.14-r1  +perl 0 kB
[ebuild  N    ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +java +kde -ldap -mozilla -nas +python +xml2 +zlib 0 kB

Total size of downloads: 0 kB


I have -gtk -gtk2 -gnome in my make.conf.



Try
Code:
USE="-eds" emerge openoffice
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kilianh
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Suka,

Thanks for the cool 2.0.0 ebuild 8). I have some library issues with it, but that's on a separate thread (https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-394580.html).

What I wanna raise here is the extras that ooo can be compiled with. You seem to expose them through USE flags, but my emerge log shows
Code:

Building openoffice
        tag:                OOO_2_0_0
        apply rules:        /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/patches/OOO_2_0/apply
        build dir:          /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0/build/OOO_2_0_0
        tools dir:          /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-2.0.0/work/ooo-build-2.0.0
        src package dir:    /usr/portage/distfiles
        distro:             Gentoo
        widget sets:        gtk kde
        icons:              industrial crystal hicontrast
        gcc to use:         from system
        hunspell-uno:       no
        hunspell-lib:       no needed
        openclipart:        no
        mono bindings:      no
        mdbtools/access:    no
        java:               yes
        ooo-install-dir:    openoffice
        force gcc33:        no
        ccache:             no
        icecream:           no
        cairo:              no
        build type:         product build
        download mirror:    http://go-ooo.org/packages


with the following use flags:
Code:

[ebuild  N    ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0  +curl +eds +gnome +java +kde -ldap +mozilla -nas +python +xml2 +zlib 0 kB


Basically I see that there are other build options that seem to be disabled by default (config.log says --disable-access --disable-mono --disable-cairo) or by some other way. But especially openclipart, mdbtools and cairo sound like they would be cool things to have in OOo.

So, is there a reason these are disabled? Or haven't you gotten round to implementing these through use flags?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M.Pomme
n00b
n00b


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

qupada wrote:


I think for openoffice-bin you need a 32 bit jre.
I used the same one (sun jre v1.5.0_04) that i downloaded for the purpose of java applets in firefox-bin (per this tutorial: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Install_firefox_with_flash_and_java_on_amd64), OpenOffice found it fine with use of the add button in the preferences.


Oh, ok, thank you. I'll think about this if i ever feel the need for java support in openoffice. I'm not quite sure why it should require a 32 bit jre, as java bytecode is, well, java bytecode, but apparently it does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suka
Developer
Developer


Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 383

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kilianh wrote:

Basically I see that there are other build options that seem to be disabled by default (config.log says --disable-access --disable-mono --disable-cairo) or by some other way. But especially openclipart, mdbtools and cairo sound like they would be cool things to have in OOo.

So, is there a reason these are disabled? Or haven't you gotten round to implementing these through use flags?


Actually there is a reason for each of them ;) Basically all three of them are not finished / experimental stuff, to add to that:

*) access-support breaks the build atm
*) Mono scripting stuff does not work out of the box
*) Cairo-stuff has a few nasty bugs and as it replaces the native drawing code, this is a no-go atm

But be sure that all of them will be coming sometime, but first we have to iron out all the basic stuff ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PrakashP
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 27 Oct 2003
Posts: 1246
Location: C.C.A.A., Germania

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Q-collective wrote:
Xake wrote:
Ok, sorry. While I have not yet tried to emerge openoffice (it seems like it is problem with it and modular xorg) i have this little fella...;)

Code:
# genlop -t openoffice
 * app-office/openoffice

     Sun Oct 16 09:09:50 2005 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.0.0_rc2
       merge time: 1 day, 21 hours, 37 minutes and 30 seconds.


You guys just don't want to know what I did to this computer while emerging that thing...;) It is a P42.8 safely clocked to 3.0 using gcc-4.0.2 if you wanted to know....:-P

Wtf, that should be way faster. Think like 4 hours 8O


I suspect the CPU got heated up too much, thus it was constantly throttled. Well, one should know how to oc... :roll:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Desktop Environments All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 4 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum