View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
line72 Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 8:43 pm Post subject: sucky burner?? |
|
|
I have an ide tdk velocd 24x10x40 burner, and i have had the worst luck with it. It sucks !!! i can't seem to burn anything. I have a 1.2 athlon with 512 megs ram and i can only burn at < 8x or i'll get a buffer underun. Any body know why. Did i miss something in compiling my kernel. Gentoo automatically enables dma for my hard drive and stuff so i assume my burner get dma enabled too. Any ideas?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you burn on 8+ using 'm Window$, (media used can also cause errors) well I have a similar system using plextor 12x and never had problem with buffer, so there's definitly something wrong with your setup. But what, I can't tell.
Code: | Alex root # cat /proc/ide/hdc/settings
name value min max mode
---- ----- --- --- ----
bios_cyl 0 0 1023 rw
bios_head 0 0 255 rw
bios_sect 0 0 63 rw
current_speed 34 0 70 rw
ide_scsi 0 0 1 rw
init_speed 12 0 70 rw
io_32bit 1 0 3 rw
keepsettings 0 0 1 rw
log 0 0 1 rw
nice1 1 0 1 rw
number 2 0 3 rw
pio_mode write-only 0 255 w
slow 0 0 1 rw
transform 1 0 3 rw
unmaskirq 1 0 1 rw
using_dma 1 0 1 rw |
Sorry can't help, lX.
Harddisk and Cdrom are on different IDE-ports? _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
line72 Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't have windows so I've never tried. I had my one hd on my primary master, my burner on secondary master, and dvdrom on secondary slave
Code: |
name value min max mode
---- ----- --- --- ----
bios_cyl 0 0 1023 rw
bios_head 0 0 255 rw
bios_sect 0 0 63 rw
current_speed 34 0 70 rw
ide_scsi 0 0 1 rw
init_speed 12 0 70 rw
io_32bit 1 0 3 rw
keepsettings 0 0 1 rw
log 0 0 1 rw
nice1 1 0 1 rw
number 2 0 3 rw
pio_mode write-only 0 255 w
slow 0 0 1 rw
transform 1 0 3 rw
unmaskirq 1 0 1 rw
using_dma 1 0 1 rw
|
i have 24x media so its not a media problem, anyone ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2002 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you measure hd and cdrom read performance. HD is hdparm -tT /dev/hda1. Cdrom well just cp a file and you surely can tell the difference between 8x and 32x/40x or whatever. When does the buffer-underrun occur (to state the obvious use similated run). And does the buffer keep up and then suddenly ain't filled anymore?
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
line72 Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Fri Jun 14, 2002 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok here's the result from my hard drive /dev/hda:
Code: |
dillavou app-cdr # hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.81 seconds =157.82 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.28 seconds = 28.10 MB/sec
|
why is my hard drive so slow ??
and from my dvd drive (hdd):
Code: |
dillavou app-cdr # hdparm -tT /dev/hdd
/dev/hdd:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.81 seconds =158.39 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 39.23 seconds = 1.63 MB/sec
|
I didn't know how to do my burner so i deleted hdc=scsi from my menu.lst and rebooted and here's what i get:
Code: |
dillavou dev # hdparm -tT /dev/hdc
/dev/hdc:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.90 seconds =142.62 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 24.80 seconds = 2.58 MB/sec
|
now what ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
line72 Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2002 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i just put this burner in my girlfriend mandrake box and it works great, i'm using mandrake's config for my kernel, so i should have the same kernel as her. Is it a problem with my hardware, did i screw something up when building my computer ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delta407 Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Apr 2002 Posts: 2876 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2002 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have this exact burner, and it's excellent under Gentoo. I can cook CDs at 24x with under 4% load on one of my 1.0 GHz P3s. Check your configuration. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
line72 Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2002 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
any chance you could post the .config file you used to build your kernel (maybe i'm missing something) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheWart Guru
Joined: 10 May 2002 Posts: 432 Location: Nashville,TN - USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
you are not by any chance trying to record from the dvd are you? if you are, you will get all kinds of errors because both the burner and the dvd drive are on the same ide channel _________________ Face it, we are all noobs.
On the box it said it was designed for Win XP or better, so why won't it work with Linux? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delta407 Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Apr 2002 Posts: 2876 Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
line72 Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jun 2002 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no i'm not try to burn from my dvd, just files of my hard drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
madpenguin8 n00b
Joined: 19 Jun 2002 Posts: 38 Location: Detroit MI
|
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2002 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why not try a dmesg, and see if the kernel is spitting out an error about not having the right ide driver compiled in. I made this mistake and had very poor performance when transfering files. I rebuilt my kernel right and now enjoy great performance improvements. This is usually the problem with windows machines also, improper ide drivers cause many buffer under-runs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|