View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rainmaker Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 1650 Location: /home/NL/ehv/
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | patch -p1 --dry-run < patch-2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt (/usr/src/linux)
patching file Documentation/Changes
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] |
That's not the problem. The patch is just b0rked somehow... _________________ If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mcspiff Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 24 Oct 2004 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rainmaker wrote: | Code: | patch -p1 --dry-run < patch-2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt (/usr/src/linux)
patching file Documentation/Changes
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] |
That's not the problem. The patch is just b0rked somehow... |
Too bad we can never tell where it came from with these guys... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John5788 Advocate
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 2140 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
works for me so far so good _________________ John5788 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok guys, i don't know what this ebuild error is about, i sent the rt patchs to darckness, then he added two patches i forgot and diffed it again.....
Ill talk to him again today and try to figure it out together.
PS: its worth to wait, as i probably figured out whats the problem with framebuffer in rt, so it'll probably work in the updated patch too.
Just some patience... it might be the cause that darckness diffed it against nitro stable or something,
sorry , i cant tell before darckness is available again....
cheers,
T
PS: Sorry for that N*L shit again, it won't happen again, we had some bad day yesterday.....
EDIT: so, the framebuffer is definitely solved for 2.6.11-nitro0-rt
I'd appreciate an update about if the patch/ebuild online work now, darckness did some fixes yesterday.
rt release also has working sk98lin, i use it myself.... network connection is also slightly faster than usually, like all
other things,
probably because of the realtime-patches. this release also includes sched-iso from con, if someone uses the
schedtool for launching tasks.... _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fallow Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2208 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
on which cpu scheduler is based nitro-rt version ? (I`m fast looking at the rt version patchlist but can`t find staircase here ) - so : Ingo`s RTP and O(1) ?
cheers _________________ "Time is a companion that goes with us on a journey. It reminds us to cherish each moment, because it will never come again. What we leave behind is not as important as how we have lived" J-L. Picard |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey fallow, first of all: sorry for all the shit from yesterday and stuff i was talking about you recently.
Realtime-Preempt patches from ingo is the base for this patchset.
It is only compatible with O(1) as ingo did it as extension to his O(1) scheduler.
It also includes sched-iso from con.
cheers,
T
EDIT: although, the rt version includes about 200 patches total, so also some little fixes for sched i grabbed from lkml, kernel-traffic and
via email from kernel-maintainers.
EDIT2: ok, i checked the patch itself, the rt is fixed now, as far as the patch itself is concerned, apply against rc5,
ebuild is most probably also fixed.
Frambuffer fix will be added later today, i don't have access to the server. Cheers. _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pifactorial Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Posts: 77 Location: 3<x<4 on the gamma function
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
WHA?!? I was about to make a post confirming that rt emerge does work, but it doesn't! I re-downloaded the patch and ebuild from the first post, but I still get:
Code: | nitro-sources # emerge nitro-sources
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) sys-kernel/nitro-sources-2.6.11_rc5-r0 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) patch-2.6.11-rc5.bz2
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) patch-2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt.bz2
>>> Preparing to unpack ...
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking linux-2.6.10.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/nitro-sources-2.6.11_rc5-r0/work
* Applying patch-2.6.11-rc5.patch (-p0+) ... [ ok ]
* Applying patch-2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt.patch (-p0+) ...
patch: pch.c:621: intuit_diff_type: Assertion `i0 != NONE' failed. [ !! ]
* Please attach /var/tmp/portage/nitro-sources-2.6.11_rc5-r0/temp/patch-2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt.err to any bug you may post.
!!! ERROR: sys-kernel/nitro-sources-2.6.11_rc5-r0 failed.
!!! Function unipatch, Line 570, Exitcode 0
!!! Unable to dry-run patch.
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
i just tested it, cant be.
Another thing: the initial release of rc5 on kernel.org was broken, so redownloading from kernel org might help...
Anyway, i put the patchs in the same dir as the dir with rc5 is in, and do patch -p1 -i ../patch-2.6.11-nitro0-rt from within the rc5
directory.
And it worked 30 minutes ago, so try the manual way, i dont know much about emerging and ebuilds, i dont use gentoo.
Cheers,
T
EDIT: most probably the ebuild is still broken, or whatever....... Got to bug darckness when he wakes up... oh man... _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
super-lupo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 92 Location: Germany / Berlin
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your hard work Tiger.
Will try it again when I´m home.
And never mind about yesterday. Shit happens.
Greetings,
Lupo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a13x Apprentice
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get the same error as pifactorial and the others but I can confirm that the patch works if you apply it manually with patch -p1. I think there still are some problems with the ebuild. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the feedback!!!!!!!!
Now we only need darckness to get his a*s around ( LOL ) and fix the ebuild.
I dont use gentoo + i dont have the access to the online nitro repo.
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
super-lupo Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 29 Jun 2004 Posts: 92 Location: Germany / Berlin
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shame on you...
Greetings,
Lupo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, shame on me , i use lfs instead....
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rainmaker Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 1650 Location: /home/NL/ehv/
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, but the rt patch still doesn't work... Is it supposed to apply on top of nitro or plain 2.6.11-r5 ?
PS LFS? Why on earth would you want to figure out your own dependencies when portage can do it all for you?? _________________ If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Because i dont only want to know IF something works, but also HOW it works.
PS: patch it with -p1 and ontop of plain 2.6.11-rc5 , that would be:
grab 2.6.10 from kernel.org
patch with -p1 against 2.6.11-rc5
patch with -p1 against 2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt
cheers,
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a13x Apprentice
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've just compiled and tested the new nitro-rt kernel. I get kernel panic ... what a shame |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what is your system setup, + i see you use reiser4, and it MIGHT have something to do with it,
AND don't forget, the version currently online HAS B0RKED FRAMEBUFFER!!! dont use framebuffer and dont use vesafb-tng,
this WILL result in a panic OR just a plain silent lockup at boot!!.
i have the patch to fix it here, but still waiting for darckness to update the patch that is still online and fix the ebuild.
Also make sure about 8 K stacks and not to go too far with cflags,
although on my system it runs freakin well with
O3 -march=athlon-xp -mtune=athlon-xp -mmmx -msse -m3dnow -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -fprefetch-loop-arrays -mfpmath=sse -fbranch-target-load-optimize2 -ftracer -falign-functions=32,
although someone claimed in love thread that nitro kernels cant handle such cflags
cheers,
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
seppe Guru
Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 431 Location: Hove, Antwerp, Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
realtime b0rks here as well. I get "loading reiser4 bitmap" or something, and then a bunch of weird stuff and that's it. Too bad, I really wanted to play with Realtime Preemption
I'm thinking of going back to reiser3 .. because I want to check out beagle as well, which won't work with reiser4. _________________ nitro-sources, because between stable and experimental there exists only speed
Latest release I made: 2.6.13.2-nitro1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rainmaker Veteran
Joined: 12 Feb 2004 Posts: 1650 Location: /home/NL/ehv/
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tiger683 wrote: | Because i dont only want to know IF something works, but also HOW it works.
PS: patch it with -p1 and ontop of plain 2.6.11-rc5 , that would be:
grab 2.6.10 from kernel.org
patch with -p1 against 2.6.11-rc5
patch with -p1 against 2.6.11-rc5-nitro0-rt
cheers,
T |
Confirmed, it applies cleanly on top op 2.6.11-r5. Ebuild doesn't work though... I'm gonna try and see if this is even faster then non-rt nitro _________________ If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Update: darckness is currently fixing the ebuild, so should work asap.
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@ seppe and all:
well, sorry guys, i run reiser3 and darckness has no reiser 4 either, ill make me a little reiser4 partition for testing for the next release...
for now, big big sorry, + reiser 3.6 is at least compatible with just about everything, so consider....
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a13x Apprentice
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm using 8KB stacks, I haven't touched the CFLAGS (I had a bad experience with them ...) nor do I have vesa-tng or framebuffer support.
My CPU is Athlon XP 1800+. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, i fugure its MOST likely reiser4.
although i have an idea how we might be able to fix it.
if someone feels like trying it with reiser4 AGAIN, raise your hand, i want to know if its worth the effort to bother darckness about updating the whole patch with this too and uploading...
cheers,
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
discomfitor l33t
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 927 Location: None
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whew. Sorry that stuff has gone to hell, but I suppose that's what happens when I get a massive fever and am clinically dead for 15 hours.
I just fixed the rt patch so that framebuffer works. Woo! As for the error that some of you are experiencing, it isn't caused by the patch. It's a bug in portage. If you google for "intuit_diff_type", you'll see that it has shown up in several versions of various patchsets. Basically, there's two solutions. It might just randomly decide to work, or I can make another patch to deal with portage's screwiness.
I'm currently doing my part. _________________ There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort.
Last edited by discomfitor on Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a13x Apprentice
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want I can help you by providing the output of the kernel panic. Of course it's a pain in the ass to copy all those hex numbers.
Here's how it roughly looks:
Code: |
Process swapper (pid: 1, thread info=cffc0000 task=c127f7f0)
Stack: ---lots of hex---
Call trace:
some_hex_number buffered_rmqueue
another_hex_number _spin_lock
another_hex_number search_binary_handler
.............................................................................
hex_number kernel_thread_helper
Code: --lots of 2 digit hex--
<0> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init !
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|