Wine amd64 ebuild

Sm1 · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:43 am Post subject: Wine amd64 ebuild

I'm not sure if anyone else has noticed, but it looks like wine was unmasked for ~amd64 for the 20050211 ebuild.

I attempted to compile (with my hopes up), but it doesn't seem to want to work for me

ebrostig · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:52 am Post subject:

Well, the problem is a missing libXext.a which only exists in 64-bit form (at least on my machine, the emul-* does not contain it.)

I also checked out the source from CVS but get the same result.
Raise a bug over at bugs.gentoo.org with the problem and let the Gentoo devs either advice a patch or raise and issue with upstream.

Sm1 · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:38 am Post subject:

Filed as Bug 82758
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82758

maiku · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:38 am Post subject:

ebrostig · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:18 pm Post subject:

yes, it's your fault...

You are trying to do some cross-compiling and it fails...

maiku · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:51 pm Post subject:

No, I read the output. I just didn't understand it very well to be frank. I don't really know what cross compiling is or how I enabled it or how, even, to disable it. That is why I posted

.
_________________
Michael

dook43 · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:18 pm Post subject:

Sm1 · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject:

I don't believe that is his fault, with the cross compiling. It seems that this wine build is trying to build a 32 bit binary, and if you try to emerge it - look at the gcc lines, and you will see the -m32 on each one. Also, remember the linking issue that I posted about pertains to there not being a 32 bit binary of libXext.a He may just have a different issue. Perhaps you might want to try taking a look at what USE flags are being used to compile.

maiku · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:45 pm Post subject:

Hey that's some good thinking, thanks. Unfortunately after trying to kill all of the USE flags one at a time it still wouldn't work. Even when I took them all out.

Sm1 · Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 7:00 pm Post subject:

Perhaps look into your config.log in the building directory, see exactly what reason it decided to yell at you.

electronerd · n00b Joined: 17 May 2004 Posts: 1

Actually, -m32 is *not* cross-compiling. I believe he needs to take -march and -mcpu out of the CFLAGS. configure gets confused and *thinks* it's cross-compiling, when it actually isn't.

maiku · Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 4:59 pm Post subject:

Heh, I just compiled with FEATURES="-sandbox" and I got the same error as the first post in this forum. I guess it just goes to show you that despite all of my efforts to make a 32-bit sandbox were for nothing. I'll just use jref.com for now since I can't use JQuickTrans then. Thanks a bunch.
_________________
Michael

herbie · Guru Joined: 09 Oct 2002 Posts: 319 Location: London UK

well I got it to compile, see bug 82758 for the patch to the ebuild (you need to create two symlinks in /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib also). Seems to work pretty well here.

dook43 · Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:41 am Post subject:

What emul-linux-x86 package contains libXext.so and libXext.a? I seem to have somehow lost those doing an invalid ln -sf command..

_________________
"We who are about to die salute you!"

herbie · Guru Joined: 09 Oct 2002 Posts: 319 Location: London UK

emul-linux-x86-xlibs contains libXext.so.6. libXext.so.a is not needed.

dook43 · Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject:

OK. Got rid of the libXext.* errors....got a new one though..

Spinix · n00b Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 41

how should i apply this patch?? when i insert it into /var/tmp/portage/winedir/build-info
it is deleted each time i start emerge wine!!

am i doing sth wrong?? (defenetly so plz help!!)

dook43 · Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:13 pm Post subject:

Spinix · n00b Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 41

for me it worked without local

now it's somehow downloading emul-x86-soundlibs or something like this

is that right??

dook43 · Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:19 pm Post subject:

Spinix · n00b Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 41

herbie · Guru Joined: 09 Oct 2002 Posts: 319 Location: London UK

spinix, your problem is probably that you have not created the symlinks I mentioned in bugzilla (this is need atm as the emul-linux-x86-xlibs ebuild is a little broken).

cd /emul/linux/x86/usr/lib (or /emul/linux/x86/usr/X11R6/lib , whichever contains your libXext.* files)
ln -s libXext.so.6.4 libXext.so
ln -s libX11.so.6.2 libX11.so

Spinix · n00b Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 41

i thought about it just before u wrote me and did that and it really compiled :]

i had only the symlinks which this other guy said not these you said that was the problem
lets see how far it will compile ;]

Spinix · n00b Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 41

now i got this error... :/

maiku · Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 8:20 pm Post subject:

Got an error myself