View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Evil Dark Archon Guru
Joined: 21 Dec 2002 Posts: 562 Location: Santa Rosa, CA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
predatorfreak l33t
Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 708 Location: USA, Michigan.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sir_tez wrote: | predatorfreak wrote: | sir_tez wrote: | Which io scheduler do you guys recommend for gaming? I'd been using CFQ all this time, but word *finally* got to me that it's not the best for gaming. There were also some comments that staircase is bad for gaming but I don't think there's a way to change the process scheduler. |
Got a source for this? as those are blatent lies, Staircase and CFQ are both great in gaming and provide great system proformance and respondiveness. Pretty much, staircase and CFQ should provide the BEST gaming proformance of any IO/CPU Scheduler combo. |
Sheesh, this isn't a personal attack, dude. I've been using CFQ since 2.6.1 or so. Just experimenting. When I read this thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-280793-highlight-speeding.html
I wondered what the differences were between the 4 io-schedulers and such. |
What they state is that because staircase and CFQ are fair they don't give as many resources, but this wouldn't matter much anyway. When you play a game, it will truely suck resources, unfair schedulers could even lead to your entire system HANGING. In other words, your best bet truely is CFQ/Staircase because both are fair to all processes, preventing starvation.
Edit: Also, staircase has Improved quite alot since that article on kerneltrap.
Edit: Fixed stupid typo's. _________________ System: predatorbox
Distro: Arch Linux x86_64
Current projects: blackhole, convmedia and anything else I cook up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Isaiah Guru
Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's been awhile since I played with nitro and reiser4 - am pleased to report everything is working great here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John5788 Advocate
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Posts: 2140 Location: 127.0.0.1
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
predatorfreak wrote: | sir_tez wrote: | predatorfreak wrote: | sir_tez wrote: | Which io scheduler do you guys recommend for gaming? I'd been using CFQ all this time, but word *finally* got to me that it's not the best for gaming. There were also some comments that staircase is bad for gaming but I don't think there's a way to change the process scheduler. |
Got a source for this? as those are blatent lies, Staircase and CFQ are both great in gaming and provide great system proformance and respondiveness. Pretty much, staircase and CFQ should provide the BEST gaming proformance of any IO/CPU Scheduler combo. |
Sheesh, this isn't a personal attack, dude. I've been using CFQ since 2.6.1 or so. Just experimenting. When I read this thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-280793-highlight-speeding.html
I wondered what the differences were between the 4 io-schedulers and such. |
What they state is that because staircase and CFQ are fair they don't give as many resources, but this wouldn't matter much anyway. When you play a game, it will truely suck resources, unfair schedulers could even lead to your entire system HANGING. In other words, your best bet truely is CFQ/Staircase because both are fair to all processes, preventing starvation.
Edit: Also, staircase has Improved quite alot since that article on kerneltrap.
Edit: Fixed stupid typo's. |
its the sacrifice u make speed over stability _________________ John5788 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arainach l33t
Joined: 08 Jul 2004 Posts: 609
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
These things work perfectly with the latest ati-drivers. Other people with 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels are having problems - I was having problems under nitro 2.6.11-rc3. But something in this release made it all work flawlessly. Grats on the great kernel release, AGAIN.
Oh, and I still can't get vesafb-tng working, but I'll experiment with the regular vesa and radeon framebuffers and see if I can't make something happen. Here's my grub.conf:
Code: | title Gentoo Linux (trying to fix the Fscking FB)
root (hd0,0)
kernel (hd0,0)/kernel-nitro ro root=/dev/hda3 video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr,pmipal,1280x1024-32@60 splash=verbose,theme:emergence
initrd (hd0,0)/fbsplash-emergence-1280x1024 | Any tips? I had vesafb-tng working great back in Gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.9-r13, but I'm sticking with Nitro now, so it looks like it's troubleshooting time for me. _________________ Gentoo: Stage3 w/ NPTL & udev, gcc 3.4.4 full rebuild
Kernel: 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 w/ 1G-Lowmem Patch
System: Athlon XP 2.2Ghz/1GB Corsair Value/160GB, 250GB WD IDE/128MB GeForce 6800/Sony 17" Trinitron G200 @ 1280x1024x75Hz |
|
Back to top |
|
|
predatorfreak l33t
Joined: 13 Jan 2005 Posts: 708 Location: USA, Michigan.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
John5788 wrote: | predatorfreak wrote: | sir_tez wrote: | predatorfreak wrote: | sir_tez wrote: | Which io scheduler do you guys recommend for gaming? I'd been using CFQ all this time, but word *finally* got to me that it's not the best for gaming. There were also some comments that staircase is bad for gaming but I don't think there's a way to change the process scheduler. |
Got a source for this? as those are blatent lies, Staircase and CFQ are both great in gaming and provide great system proformance and respondiveness. Pretty much, staircase and CFQ should provide the BEST gaming proformance of any IO/CPU Scheduler combo. |
Sheesh, this isn't a personal attack, dude. I've been using CFQ since 2.6.1 or so. Just experimenting. When I read this thread:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-280793-highlight-speeding.html
I wondered what the differences were between the 4 io-schedulers and such. |
What they state is that because staircase and CFQ are fair they don't give as many resources, but this wouldn't matter much anyway. When you play a game, it will truely suck resources, unfair schedulers could even lead to your entire system HANGING. In other words, your best bet truely is CFQ/Staircase because both are fair to all processes, preventing starvation.
Edit: Also, staircase has Improved quite alot since that article on kerneltrap.
Edit: Fixed stupid typo's. |
its the sacrifice u make speed over stability |
Its a sacrifice I would NEVER make, stablity is above all else on my list, if something destablizes my entire system, it goes and if i can, i try to make sure not to do anything which could have a destablizing effect. Stablity and security come before speed on my machine. _________________ System: predatorbox
Distro: Arch Linux x86_64
Current projects: blackhole, convmedia and anything else I cook up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jzono1 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 128
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nvidia is being just silly with this one for me:
Code: | NVIDIA: calling KBUILD...
make CC=gcc KBUILD_OUTPUT=/lib/modules/2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/build KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 -C /lib/modules/2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/source SUBDIRS=/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1'
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/build \
KBUILD_SRC=/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1 KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 \
KBUILD_CHECK= KBUILD_EXTMOD="/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv\ -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/Makefile modules
mkdir -p /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/.tmp_versions
make -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/scripts/Makefile.build obj=/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv
gcc -Wp,-MD,/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/.os-agp.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Iinclude2 -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/include -I/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -msoft-float -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/include/asm-i386/mach-default -Iinclude/asm-i386/mach-default -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv -Wall -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wno-multichar -Werror -O -fno-common -MD -Wno-cast-qual -Wno-error -D_LOOSE_KERNEL_NAMES -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNTRM -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LOOSE_KERNEL_NAMES -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNV_MAJOR_VERSION=1 -DNV_MINOR_VERSION=0 -DNV_PATCHLEVEL=6629 -DNV_UNIX -DNV_LINUX -DNV_INT64_OK -DNVCPU_X86 -UDEBUG -U_DEBUG -DNDEBUG -DNV_REMAP_PFN_RANGE_PRESENT -DNV_CHANGE_PAGE_ATTR_PRESENT -DNV_PCI_DISABLE_DEVICE_PRESENT -DNV_CLASS_SIMPLE_CREATE_PRESENT -DNV_PCI_GET_CLASS_PRESENT -DMODULE -DKBUILD_BASENAME=os_agp -DKBUILD_MODNAME=nvidia -c -o /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.o /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c
In file included from include/linux/list.h:7,
from include/linux/wait.h:23,
from include/asm/semaphore.h:41,
from include/linux/sched.h:19,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv-linux.h:52,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:24:
include/linux/prefetch.h: In function `prefetch_range':
include/linux/prefetch.h:62: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
In file included from include/linux/dmapool.h:14,
from include/linux/pci.h:864,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv-linux.h:75,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:24:
include/asm/io.h: In function `check_signature':
include/asm/io.h:242: warning: wrong type argument to increment
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: At top level:
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:48: error: syntax error before '*' token
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:48: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `drm_agp_p'
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:48: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernInitAGP':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:76: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:85: error: request for member `acquire' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:88: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:113: error: request for member `copy_info' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:173: error: request for member `enable' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:185: error: request for member `release' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:186: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernTeardownAGP':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:216: error: request for member `release' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:218: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernAllocAGPPages':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:265: error: request for member `allocate_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:273: error: request for member `bind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:290: error: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:305: error: request for member `free_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernMapAGPPages':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:345: error: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernFreeAGPPages':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:444: error: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:445: error: request for member `free_memory' in something not a structure or union
make[3]: *** [/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [_module_/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv] Error 2
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1'
NVIDIA: left KBUILD.
nvidia.ko failed to build!
make: *** [module] Error 1
|
I downloaded the pkg1 file & did stuff by hand, is that suposed to be fine? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sibov Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 Feb 2004 Posts: 147 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
GREAT WORK SEPPE
This kernel looks damned good.
This kernel gets a gaming approved seal for Teamspeak working _________________ Gentoo 2.6.17-gentoo-r5 with dmraid Raid0 Dualboot
AMD64 X2 3800+, 4x512MB DDR PC3200Pro Corsair Geforce EN6600GT silencer @ 256MB
4x250GB SATAII Samsung SP120, Asus A8N Premium, Plextor PX712SA DVDRW
Logitech Dinovo, SB Audigy4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GaMMa l33t
Joined: 23 Aug 2002 Posts: 684 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just tried upgrading from 2.6.10-nitro4 and the keyboard doesn't seem to work on this release. The numlock key stays on when it boots into a login prompt... any ideas? I've had this problem with mm-sources in the past, and still don't know the cause. _________________ Ubuntu Linux Dapper Drake running Gnome-2.14.1
[Website | Screenshot | Portage Guide] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bollucks l33t
Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 606
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GaMMa wrote: | I just tried upgrading from 2.6.10-nitro4 and the keyboard doesn't seem to work on this release. The numlock key stays on when it boots into a login prompt... any ideas? I've had this problem with mm-sources in the past, and still don't know the cause. |
You can see this happen if you leave legacy USB support enabled or even set to AUTO in your BIOS. See if that's on, and try disabling it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cisien n00b
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jzono1 wrote: | Nvidia is being just silly with this one for me:
Code: | NVIDIA: calling KBUILD...
make CC=gcc KBUILD_OUTPUT=/lib/modules/2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/build KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 -C /lib/modules/2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/source SUBDIRS=/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1'
make -C /lib/modules/2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/build \
KBUILD_SRC=/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1 KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 \
KBUILD_CHECK= KBUILD_EXTMOD="/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv\ -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/Makefile modules
mkdir -p /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/.tmp_versions
make -f /usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/scripts/Makefile.build obj=/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv
gcc -Wp,-MD,/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/.os-agp.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.4/include -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Iinclude2 -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/include -I/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -msoft-float -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686 -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1/include/asm-i386/mach-default -Iinclude/asm-i386/mach-default -Wdeclaration-after-statement -I/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv -Wall -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wno-multichar -Werror -O -fno-common -MD -Wno-cast-qual -Wno-error -D_LOOSE_KERNEL_NAMES -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNTRM -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LOOSE_KERNEL_NAMES -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNV_MAJOR_VERSION=1 -DNV_MINOR_VERSION=0 -DNV_PATCHLEVEL=6629 -DNV_UNIX -DNV_LINUX -DNV_INT64_OK -DNVCPU_X86 -UDEBUG -U_DEBUG -DNDEBUG -DNV_REMAP_PFN_RANGE_PRESENT -DNV_CHANGE_PAGE_ATTR_PRESENT -DNV_PCI_DISABLE_DEVICE_PRESENT -DNV_CLASS_SIMPLE_CREATE_PRESENT -DNV_PCI_GET_CLASS_PRESENT -DMODULE -DKBUILD_BASENAME=os_agp -DKBUILD_MODNAME=nvidia -c -o /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.o /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c
In file included from include/linux/list.h:7,
from include/linux/wait.h:23,
from include/asm/semaphore.h:41,
from include/linux/sched.h:19,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv-linux.h:52,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:24:
include/linux/prefetch.h: In function `prefetch_range':
include/linux/prefetch.h:62: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic
In file included from include/linux/dmapool.h:14,
from include/linux/pci.h:864,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/nv-linux.h:75,
from /home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:24:
include/asm/io.h: In function `check_signature':
include/asm/io.h:242: warning: wrong type argument to increment
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: At top level:
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:48: error: syntax error before '*' token
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:48: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `drm_agp_p'
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:48: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernInitAGP':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:76: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:85: error: request for member `acquire' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:88: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:113: error: request for member `copy_info' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:173: error: request for member `enable' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:185: error: request for member `release' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:186: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernTeardownAGP':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:216: error: request for member `release' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:218: warning: `inter_module_put' is deprecated (declared at include/linux/module.h:578)
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernAllocAGPPages':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:265: error: request for member `allocate_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:273: error: request for member `bind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:290: error: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:305: error: request for member `free_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernMapAGPPages':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:345: error: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c: In function `KernFreeAGPPages':
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:444: error: request for member `unbind_memory' in something not a structure or union
/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.c:445: error: request for member `free_memory' in something not a structure or union
make[3]: *** [/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv/os-agp.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [_module_/home/jo/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6629-pkg1/usr/src/nv] Error 2
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1'
NVIDIA: left KBUILD.
nvidia.ko failed to build!
make: *** [module] Error 1
|
I downloaded the pkg1 file & did stuff by hand, is that suposed to be fine? |
good to know i'm not the only poor sucker to have this issue...
i have a post i started... link: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-297528.html
any input would be appreciated |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wong n00b
Joined: 25 Aug 2004 Posts: 15 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hi guys, i have a little probem
when I try to compile rt2400 module (for wifi card) I get this:
Code: | make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1'
CC [M] /home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.o
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c: In function `RT2400_probe':
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:134: warning: passing arg 1 of `readl' makes pointer from integer without a cast
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:135: warning: passing arg 1 of `readl' makes pointer from integer without a cast
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c: In function `RT2400_open':
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:258: warning: passing arg 2 of `writel' makes pointer from integer without a cast
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp.h:862: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'NICDisableInterrupt': function body not available
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:205: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp.h:865: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'NICEnableInterrupt': function body not available
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:259: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c: In function `RTMPIsr':
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:378: warning: passing arg 1 of `readl' makes pointer from integer without a cast
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:379: warning: passing arg 2 of `writel' makes pointer from integer without a cast
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c: In function `RT2400_set_rx_mode':
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:580: warning: passing arg 2 of `writel' makes pointer from integer without a cast
/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.c:586: warning: passing arg 2 of `writel' makes pointer from integer without a cast
make[2]: *** [/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module/rtmp_main.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/home/wong/tmp/rt2400-1.2.1/Module] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.11-rc4-nitro1'
rt2400.ko failed to build!
make: *** [module] Error 1 |
same module i'm currently using on gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.8-gentoo-r5
any suggestion what is wrong? _________________ Compaq EVO N620c with gentoo 2004.3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DL8 n00b
Joined: 27 Jul 2004 Posts: 54 Location: Israel
|
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the release. I've downloaded, compiled and installed it smoothly. Now all I need now is to reboot and run, but I'm too lazy to do it right now. Besides, I'm having an uptime record in my box and I don't want to stop now (The uptime is quite low but high for me... 6 days and 5:23 hours). Reports later |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GaMMa l33t
Joined: 23 Aug 2002 Posts: 684 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
bollucks wrote: | GaMMa wrote: | I just tried upgrading from 2.6.10-nitro4 and the keyboard doesn't seem to work on this release. The numlock key stays on when it boots into a login prompt... any ideas? I've had this problem with mm-sources in the past, and still don't know the cause. |
You can see this happen if you leave legacy USB support enabled or even set to AUTO in your BIOS. See if that's on, and try disabling it. |
I've got a Dell i5150 laptop, and they really dumb down the bios. The only option that even mentions USB is "USB Emulation" and disabling that didn't fix my keyboard... :/ _________________ Ubuntu Linux Dapper Drake running Gnome-2.14.1
[Website | Screenshot | Portage Guide] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarkStorm_Inc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 105 Location: The Ether
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Im running across the same nvidia problem.. anyone know how to fix? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can thank the guy who refused to post it in the nitro thread, in his own thread there was a solution, and now it kinda disappeared.
Maybe this way ppl will learn to post probs about sources IN the thread of the sources.....
regards,
T
PS:
try emerging the r3, it helped that guy _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pink Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tiger683 wrote: | You can thank the guy who refused to post it in the nitro thread, in his own thread there was a solution, and now it kinda disappeared.
Maybe this way ppl will learn to post probs about sources IN the thread of the sources.....
regards,
T
PS:
try emerging the r3, it helped that guy |
I remember asking him to post here - so I had a look at my posts and here we are
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-297528-highlight-.html
Umm, I assume this is the thread you were talking about? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tiger683 Veteran
Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Posts: 1347 Location: Heffner's House
|
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, thanks.
T _________________ Retired gentoo user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
discomfitor l33t
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 927 Location: None
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I seem to have fallen off the face of the earth for a few days, but never fear! Darckness is here!
Erm...
[Subtitle: new release in R&D] _________________ There is no substitute for experience.
Imperfection indicates a lack of effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DarkStorm_Inc Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Feb 2005 Posts: 105 Location: The Ether
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
well if that does work for my nvidia problem ill soon have a nice nitro to attend to, just wonder how much of a speed up it will be... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robin79 l33t
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 632 Location: /home/valdemarsvik
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Only me that gets probs on resierf4? I have one 200 gb maxtor disk.. When i try to look on it it takes 100% cpu adn only thing to get it back to notmal is a reboot have the same probs with all 2.6.11 nitros haven tried any other ones yet... I w8 for the enxt one and stick to 2.6.10-2 that works flawless for me stable and fast... _________________ Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------
Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gimpel Advocate
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Posts: 2720 Location: Munich, Bavaria
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Robin79 wrote: | Only me that gets probs on resierf4? I have one 200 gb maxtor disk.. When i try to look on it it takes 100% cpu adn only thing to get it back to notmal is a reboot have the same probs with all 2.6.11 nitros haven tried any other ones yet... I w8 for the enxt one and stick to 2.6.10-2 that works flawless for me stable and fast... |
this is a general problem when using reiser4 together with staircase, they hate each other.
but that only affects .11-rcX releases...
http://gimpel.funpic.de/vv_test0_bonniepp.html _________________ http://proaudio.tuxfamily.org/wiki - pro-audio software overlay
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jzono1 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 128
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have some hdd access lockups, especially with painkiller loading...
maybe me having ich5 & tx2 raid controllers have something to do with that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robin79 l33t
Joined: 18 Oct 2003 Posts: 632 Location: /home/valdemarsvik
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okey hope it will work better in next realese then jzono1: does painkiller work in linux without cedega? _________________ Gentoo 2005.0
ASUS P5AD2 Deluxe MB
Intel P4 3.2GHz
PCI-E Nvidia Geforce PCX 5750
--------------------
Registered Linux User Nr # 319050 http://counter.li.org |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bollucks l33t
Joined: 27 Oct 2004 Posts: 606
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gimpel wrote: | Robin79 wrote: | Only me that gets probs on resierf4? I have one 200 gb maxtor disk.. When i try to look on it it takes 100% cpu adn only thing to get it back to notmal is a reboot have the same probs with all 2.6.11 nitros haven tried any other ones yet... I w8 for the enxt one and stick to 2.6.10-2 that works flawless for me stable and fast... |
this is a general problem when using reiser4 together with staircase, they hate each other.
but that only affects .11-rcX releases...
http://gimpel.funpic.de/vv_test0_bonniepp.html |
This does not sound like a "behavioural" bug but is almost certainly a merge problem with reiser4 and staircase. Poor interactivity is not the same as a hang stuck with 100% cpu usage. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|