View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bigV Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 102 Location: Southampton, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 10:17 am Post subject: error untaring stage file but md5sum correct - what next1? |
|
|
I am still having a problem with the stageX d/l.
I have downloaded stage1 today along with the md5sum for this file. The md5sum is correct but when I do a tar -xvjpf stage1*.bz2 I get the following error...
tar: archive contains obselescent base-64 errors
./etc/hosts
tar: skipping to next header
bzip2: Data integrity error when decompressing
It is possible that the compressed file(s) have been corrupted etc etc
You can use bzip2recover to attempt to recover the data
tar: child returned status 2
tar: error exit delayed from previous errors
I am at at total loss as to what may be causing this
any ideas??!!
Thanks
Andy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just downloaded http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo/releases/1.4_rc1/x86/stage1-x86-1.4_rc1-20020908-1208.tar.bz2 and it's md5sum, md5sum -c *.md5sum gives ok, unpacking it succeeds without problems, so I think the problem ain't in the image, md5sum s*.bz2 gives:
Quote: | 77508a77c7c16e10e769bd46b14634c0 stage1-x86-1.4_rc1-20020908-1208.tar.bz2 |
but seeing you stated tar -xvjpf stage1*.bz2, I wonder if you copied the file to the /mnt/gentoo directory c.q. have write access to the current directory, what boot cd you used (something wrong with bunzip c.q processor conflict).
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gav n00b
Joined: 10 Oct 2002 Posts: 65 Location: Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had some issues when installing from stage2/3 tarballs downloaded from mirrors. I found the MD5's were not correct and got errors un-tarring them (not surprising!). Perhaps a tarball from another site would work? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bigV Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 102 Location: Southampton, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 5:05 pm Post subject: thanks for replying |
|
|
I downloaded from a mirror site - the md5sum was correct!!
I saved to /mnt/gentoo
untaring with tar -xvjpf nearly completed but failed near the end!!
Maybe I'll follow your advice Gav and d/l the stage1 from a different site
Thanks
Andy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bigV Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 102 Location: Southampton, UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SuperTomate Guru
Joined: 02 Jun 2002 Posts: 392 Location: France
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 5:13 pm Post subject: Re: thanks for replying |
|
|
bigV wrote: | Maybe I'll follow your advice Gav and d/l the stage1 from a different site |
If the md5sum is correct, it would change nothing. No need to download again a good file.
Do you have enough free disk space on your partition /mnt/gentoo ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bigV Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 102 Location: Southampton, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
5GB for /mnt/gentoo
100 MB for boot
650 MB for swap
A. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bigV Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 102 Location: Southampton, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I use bzip2recover on the stage1 file, block 12 comes out with errors!!
I have also tried the stage1 file from the cd, mounted in /cdroot/nocompress after the initial boot (same issue)
A |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SuperTomate Guru
Joined: 02 Jun 2002 Posts: 392 Location: France
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps a memory problem ?
-> Try memtest86
Do you have another OS installed on the same hardware ? Works well ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose using the test option t instead of x gives the same error (this rules out errors where space is concerned c.q. wrongly mounted partition), As mentioned before I've downloaded the latest image from (ibiblio) and checked the md5sum and it extracted & tested correctly. So it can't be the image, and if you've done md5sum -c *.md5sum and it testes oke, then it can't be a problem with your filesystem c.q. harddrive. So it's either software related (iso.image, could very well be) but there should be more complaints then, or it's hardware related, well very strange, we've got to eliminated all possibilities, maybe you could post some details about your system, well at least cpu type.
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bigV Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 102 Location: Southampton, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your help guys - i have cracked it.
The partitions were set up incorrectly - logical instead of primary - doh!!
still - one to remember for the future!!
Thanks again
A. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I should come over and kick your bottom,........... just kidding, besides it are the most annoying errors, cause you can't blaim somebody else,
Glad you fixed it,
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zhenlin Veteran
Joined: 09 Nov 2002 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
IS memtest86 a kernel or something to be loaded by chain loader?
The ebuild suggests that it is a kernel. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lx Veteran
Joined: 28 May 2002 Posts: 1012 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zhenlin wrote: | IS memtest86 a kernel or something to be loaded by chain loader?
The ebuild suggests that it is a kernel. |
Well you could call it a kernel, but a very limited one, I would just call it a binary. It calls some memory routines and read / writes to memory using different algorithms, in order to test your memory, it doesn't form the basis for other apps it's an app executed by grub (therefor kernel is used). chainloading is when you load the bootsector of a partition and execute it ( I guess ).
Cya lX. _________________ "Remember there's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.", Frank Zappa |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pilla Bodhisattva
Joined: 07 Aug 2002 Posts: 7729 Location: Underworld
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In benchmarking, they call "kernel" a small program that exercises some aspect of the system (in this case, memory). But memtest86 is not an OS kernel at all. Just an application to test your memory, as lx stated.
lx wrote: | zhenlin wrote: | IS memtest86 a kernel or something to be loaded by chain loader?
The ebuild suggests that it is a kernel. |
Well you could call it a kernel, but a very limited one, I would just call it a binary. It calls some memory routines and read / writes to memory using different algorithms, in order to test your memory, it doesn't form the basis for other apps it's an app executed by grub (therefor kernel is used). chainloading is when you load the bootsector of a partition and execute it ( I guess ).
Cya lX. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|