View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Alapan n00b
Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 12:30 pm Post subject: Open Office and AMD 64 |
|
|
I am having problems installing open office. As you can see from below, its not because of a MD5 error. Has anyone got OO to work - I have time and space; is it possible to compile OO?
Code: |
root@~ # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" emerge openoffice-bin
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) app-office/openoffice-bin-1.1.2 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) OOo_1.1.2_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking OOo_1.1.2_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-bin-1.1.2/work
>>> Source unpacked.
>>> Install openoffice-bin-1.1.2 into /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-bin-1.1.2/image/ category app-office
* Installing OpenOffice.org into build root...
./setup: error while loading shared libraries: /lib/libsandbox.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-bin-1.1.2 failed.
!!! Function src_install, Line 88, Exitcode 127
!!! The setup program failed
|
Thanks in advance
Alapan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
himpierre l33t
Joined: 31 Aug 2002 Posts: 867 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello
Wrong forum, but okay. Try:
Code: |
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge openoffice-bin
|
And no, you can't compile openoffice on a 64bit platform. This is planned for openoffice 2.0 as far as i know.
cheers
t. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alapan n00b
Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oops - which forum should I post under?
And sandbox is enabled in my /etc/make.conf file. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cossins Veteran
Joined: 21 Mar 2003 Posts: 1136 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alapan wrote: | And sandbox is enabled in my /etc/make.conf file. |
Yeah, and the FEATURES=-sandbox disables it while executing that specific command (note the minus).
- Simon _________________ who cares |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rookie n00b
Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:27 pm Post subject: open office 1.1.2 emerge problem |
|
|
Hello,
please someone has an idea what should I do? I try to emerge openoffice-bin but install script says that setup file is missing, I searched whole disk for it and it is true...
uname -a: Linux gentoo 2.6.7-gentoo-r11 #1 Sun Aug 1 17:35:57 CEST 2004 x86_64 4 GNU/Linux
root@gentoo / # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge openoffice-bin
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) app-office/openoffice-bin-1.1.2 to /
>>> md5 src_uri OOo_1.1.2_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking OOo_1.1.2_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-bin-1.1.2/work
>>> Source unpacked.
>>> Install openoffice-bin-1.1.2 into /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-bin-1.1.2/image/ category app-office
* Installing OpenOffice.org into build root...
/usr/portage/app-office/openoffice-bin/openoffice-bin-1.1.2.ebuild: line 89: ./setup: not file or directory
!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-bin-1.1.2 failed.
!!! Function src_install, Line 89, Exitcode 127
!!! The setup program failed
All partitions are used up to 5%, I had fluxbox installed but I unmerge it, now I'm using KDE 3.2.2 with xorg-x11 6.7.0-r2
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Moved from Desktop Environments. _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rookie n00b
Joined: 02 Aug 2004 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:22 pm Post subject: open office in 2 lines |
|
|
Code: |
emerge -v app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" FEATURES="-sandbox" emerge openoffice-bin |
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thecas n00b
Joined: 28 Jul 2004 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And how about openoffice-ximian(-bin), anyone some experience with that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2004 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thecas wrote: | And how about openoffice-ximian(-bin), anyone some experience with that? | Please search this forum. The topic has been discussed (short answer, it isn't working yet). _________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kow Apprentice
Joined: 28 Dec 2003 Posts: 227
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
At some point I thought I heard that sandbox has been disabled by default.... _________________ -Kow |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alapan n00b
Joined: 21 Jul 2004 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cossins wrote: | Alapan wrote: | And sandbox is enabled in my /etc/make.conf file. |
Yeah, and the FEATURES=-sandbox disables it while executing that specific command (note the minus).
- Simon |
ooh did not see the -
It works - thanks
Now if only I could play Far Cry in Linux; then I would not need Windows at all! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ikshaar Veteran
Joined: 23 Jul 2002 Posts: 1339 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not of any immediate help but just read on planet openoffice that they hope to have a beta of OO for amd64 by the time of the release of 2.0. If everything goes fine, even a simultaneous release... too bad I did not find a note about the release date of 2.0.
Any source on that ? _________________ "May God stands between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk" - Babylon 5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
True Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 10 Apr 2002 Posts: 125 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The development snapshot of OpenOffice 2 seems to run okay on 64bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Config Retired Dev
Joined: 25 May 2003 Posts: 187 Location: Zurich, Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
True wrote: | The development snapshot of OpenOffice 2 seems to run okay on 64bit. |
Now that's what I call good news _________________ Config - caught by a chronic disease called tuxmania.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pivertd Apprentice
Joined: 08 Feb 2004 Posts: 185 Location: Arlon, Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't find any snapshot 64bits...
But yes the development snapshot 32 bit works. (I didn't check everything)
(OOo_1.9.m49_LinuxIntel_install) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ikshaar Veteran
Joined: 23 Jul 2002 Posts: 1339 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Follow-up.. just find the timeframe for 2.0 => beta for december 2004, release for March 2005... _________________ "May God stands between you and harm in all the empty places where you must walk" - Babylon 5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazycat l33t
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 838 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Someone could make about OOo & -sandbox sticky because it will be the issue for some time... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|