View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ryceck Apprentice
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 195
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Safrax wrote: | Anyone else noticed strange swap behavior with this kernel? According to top I have 256MB of ram free but yet I've got 86mb of crap in swap. Have the kernel developers gone insane and started trying to copy Microsoft's memory mismanagement or something? |
Dont' have that problem.... What the output of?
Perhaps u accidentally started windows 98 or something... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Safrax Guru
Joined: 23 Apr 2002 Posts: 422
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ryceck wrote: | Safrax wrote: | Anyone else noticed strange swap behavior with this kernel? According to top I have 256MB of ram free but yet I've got 86mb of crap in swap. Have the kernel developers gone insane and started trying to copy Microsoft's memory mismanagement or something? |
Dont' have that problem.... What the output of?
Perhaps u accidentally started windows 98 or something... |
Nah. I don't have win98 anymore. Won't touch it. EVIL++
I was compiling some stuff and heard a lot of hd thrashing. Curious I checked top (and free) they both showed swap being used but ram still being free. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alari n00b
Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 47 Location: Tartu, Estonia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fresh love running smoothly here...
No lockups so far... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Master_Of_Disaster l33t
Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 610 Location: 15.05072° East, 48.13747° North (aka Mauer), Austria
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Up and running on new love, everything seems to be fine except bootsplash... I recognized an error in my siimage patch. All .vendor and .device lines in siimage.h must be removed to make it compile. I'll post an updated version later this day. _________________ post tenebras lux, post fenestras tux
Registered Linux User Nr. 312509
Adopt an unanswered post today! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a compile failure:
Code: | CC drivers/pci/msi.o
drivers/pci/msi.c: In function `msi_address_init':
drivers/pci/msi.c:265: error: invalid operands to binary <<
make[2]: *** [drivers/pci/msi.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/pci] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2 |
My .config is available from here:
http://home.jesus.ox.ac.uk/~rmoss/portage/.config
I'm fairly sure it's GCC 3.4.0 specific, as I've seen errors like this before only with 3.4.0. _________________ Reality is for those who can't face Science Fiction.
emerge -U will kill your Gentoo
ecatmur, Lord of Portage Bash Scripts |
|
Back to top |
|
|
primero.gentoo Guru
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 402
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
msi error is not gcc 3.4 related. I think is broken at all , at least it is also for me with gcc 3.3.3-r6.
Love is working fine for me, also Bootsplash and reiser4 (that i use only for a test partition now).
Just a question. Does anyone had success with systrace kernel patch and love-sources? i tried several times without luck ... if anyone has suggest it would be wonderfull
Bye _________________ "Linux, the choice of a GNU generation"
==Micro$oft - just say NO==
(L#USER 353039) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pink Veteran
Joined: 24 Jul 2003 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
robmoss2k wrote: | I have a compile failure:
Code: | CC drivers/pci/msi.o
drivers/pci/msi.c: In function `msi_address_init':
drivers/pci/msi.c:265: error: invalid operands to binary <<
make[2]: *** [drivers/pci/msi.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/pci] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2 |
My .config is available from here:
http://home.jesus.ox.ac.uk/~rmoss/portage/.config
I'm fairly sure it's GCC 3.4.0 specific, as I've seen errors like this before only with 3.4.0. |
Yeah, it's not a GCC thing, turn of local APIC support for uniprocessors and your config compiles fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
evermind Guru
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
robmoss2k wrote: | I have a compile failure:
Code: | CC drivers/pci/msi.o
drivers/pci/msi.c: In function `msi_address_init':
drivers/pci/msi.c:265: error: invalid operands to binary <<
make[2]: *** [drivers/pci/msi.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/pci] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2 |
My .config is available from here:
http://home.jesus.ox.ac.uk/~rmoss/portage/.config
I'm fairly sure it's GCC 3.4.0 specific, as I've seen errors like this before only with 3.4.0. |
have a look at http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/6/10/122
this patch solved it for me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
evermind Guru
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 322
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
does it work without freezing? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
primero.gentoo Guru
Joined: 23 Dec 2003 Posts: 402
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
PickledOnion wrote: |
Yeah, it's not a GCC thing, turn of local APIC support for uniprocessors and your config compiles fine. |
I've not yet understood vey well what APIC is ... some clarify ?
Bye _________________ "Linux, the choice of a GNU generation"
==Micro$oft - just say NO==
(L#USER 353039) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robmoss Retired Dev
Joined: 27 May 2003 Posts: 2634 Location: Jesus College, Oxford
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
boroshan l33t
Joined: 16 Apr 2003 Posts: 730 Location: upside down
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
primero.gentoo wrote: |
I've not yet understood vey well what APIC is ... some clarify ?
Bye | What was it you told me recently? Oh yes: GIYF _________________ Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Taily Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 19 Jun 2004 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2004 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okey so i get this problem when compiling
AS arch/i386/kernel/vsyscall.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/time_hpet.o
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `arch/i386/kernel/std_resources.o', needed by `arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o'. Stop.
make: *** [arch/i386/kernel] Error 2
there is no std_res file, although in the linux-2.6.6 before applying the patches, there is..
Im trying to compile this on my xbox tho, but i don't see why that would make a difference at this point, or, woudl it be safe to disable std_res?
Iwe tried to compile love-sources-2.6.7_rc3-r1 and love-sources-2.6.7_rc3-r2
both with and without the xbox 2.6 kernel patches, but nothing works
EDIT: nvm, i took std_resources.c and .h from the 2.6.6 tar and it works now |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djm Arch/Herd Tester
Joined: 12 Apr 2004 Posts: 690 Location: Wadham College, Oxford
|
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I ripped cds with this kernel the files had no sound (I could play cds and rip/play dvds ok though), so I'm back on 2.6.7-rc1-love1 _________________ the forums.gentoo.org poster formally known as metal leper |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|