Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
"irq 10:nobody cared!" - gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Souperman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 6:30 pm    Post subject: "irq 10:nobody cared!" - gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7 Reply with quote

Just upgraded from 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 to 2.6.7-gentoo and I get this in my dmesg:

Code:
ohci_hcd: 2004 Feb 02 USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver (PCI)
ohci_hcd: block sizes: ed 64 td 64
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.0 to 64
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: irq 12, pci mem e13d3000
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (#2)
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.1 to 64
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: irq 11, pci mem e1405000
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 2-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.2 to 64
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: irq 10, pci mem e140c000
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3
irq 10: nobody cared!
 [<c010628a>] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x90
 [<c010637c>] note_interrupt+0x6c/0xa0
 [<c0106651>] do_IRQ+0x121/0x130
 [<c0104974>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
 [<c011b430>] __do_softirq+0x30/0x80
 [<c011b4a6>] do_softirq+0x26/0x30
 [<c010662d>] do_IRQ+0xfd/0x130
 [<c0104974>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
 [<c02205df>] pci_bus_read_config_byte+0x5f/0x90
 [<e14a339e>] ehci_start+0x2ce/0x360 [ehci_hcd]
 [<c032cb7a>] preempt_schedule+0x2a/0x50
 [<c01180eb>] release_console_sem+0xcb/0xe0
 [<c0117f3d>] printk+0x10d/0x170
 [<e13df5cb>] usb_register_bus+0x14b/0x170 [usbcore]
 [<e13e468b>] usb_hcd_pci_probe+0x2ab/0x4e0 [usbcore]
 [<c0223fc2>] pci_device_probe_static+0x52/0x70
 [<c022401b>] __pci_device_probe+0x3b/0x50
 [<c022405c>] pci_device_probe+0x2c/0x50
 [<c026902f>] bus_match+0x3f/0x70
 [<c0269159>] driver_attach+0x59/0x90
 [<c0269455>] bus_add_driver+0xa5/0xc0
 [<c026991f>] driver_register+0x2f/0x40
 [<c02242dc>] pci_register_driver+0x5c/0x90
 [<e13d1023>] init+0x23/0x30 [ehci_hcd]
 [<c012d58f>] sys_init_module+0x13f/0x280
 [<c0104007>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

handlers:
[<e13e03f0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x70 [usbcore])
Disabling IRQ #10
PCI: cache line size of 64 is not supported by device 0000:00:02.2
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 1.00, driver 2004-May-10
hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 3-0:1.0: 6 ports detected


And the equivalent lines in 2.6.5-gentoo-r1:
Code:
ohci_hcd: 2004 Feb 02 USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver (PCI)
ohci_hcd: block sizes: ed 64 td 64
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.0 to 64
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: irq 12, pci mem e1ddb000
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (#2)
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.1 to 64
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: irq 11, pci mem e1e0c000
ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 2-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.2 to 64
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: irq 9, pci mem e1e13000
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3
PCI: cache line size of 64 is not supported by device 0000:00:02.2
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 1.00, driver 2003-Dec-29
hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 3-0:1.0: 6 ports detected


Also, here's /proc/interrupt from 2.6.7:
Code:
           CPU0       
  0:      63822          XT-PIC  timer
  1:        110          XT-PIC  i8042
  2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  5:          0          XT-PIC  NVidia nForce2
  7:        148          XT-PIC  saa7134[0]
  8:         11          XT-PIC  rtc
  9:          0          XT-PIC  acpi
 10:     100000          XT-PIC  ehci_hcd
 11:       3254          XT-PIC  ohci_hcd, eth0
 12:          0          XT-PIC  ohci_hcd
 14:      11683          XT-PIC  ide0
 15:         39          XT-PIC  ide1
NMI:          0
LOC:      63768
ERR:        118
MIS:          0


and 2.6.5:
Code:
           CPU0       
  0:     118450          XT-PIC  timer
  1:        255          XT-PIC  i8042
  2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  5:          0          XT-PIC  NVidia nForce2
  7:        185          XT-PIC  saa7134[0]
  8:         14          XT-PIC  rtc
  9:          0          XT-PIC  acpi, ehci_hcd
 11:       8941          XT-PIC  ohci_hcd, eth0
 12:          0          XT-PIC  ohci_hcd
 14:       8904          XT-PIC  ide0
 15:         39          XT-PIC  ide1
NMI:          0
LOC:     118397
ERR:         85
MIS:          0


Anyone have any ideas what's going on? My USB mouse is still working OK. :?
_________________
moo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 31847
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Souperman,

What USB 2.0 devices do you have?
From your irq post of 2.6.5, I suspect none, since there were never any requests on irq 10.

ehci_hcd is for USB 2.0 devices, it is not needed for USB 1.0 or 1.1. Thats what ohci_hcd is for. If you are not using ehci_hcd, don't load it.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KpR2000
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I got the same problem with irq12.

Here are some cuts from dmesg:

Code:
.....
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
SCSI device sdb: 72303840 512-byte hdwr sectors (37020 MB)
SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back
 sdb: sdb1
Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: EHCI Host Controller
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:02.2 to 64
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: irq 12, pci mem e1205000
ehci_hcd 0000:00:02.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
irq 12: nobody cared!
 [<c01075aa>] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x90
 [<c010769c>] note_interrupt+0x6c/0xb0
 [<c0107951>] do_IRQ+0x121/0x130
 [<c0105c74>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
 [<c011acb0>] __do_softirq+0x30/0x80
 [<c011ad26>] do_softirq+0x26/0x30
 [<c010792d>] do_IRQ+0xfd/0x130
 [<c0105c74>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
 [<c01e211f>] pci_bus_read_config_byte+0x5f/0x90
 [<c029138c>] ehci_start+0x2cc/0x360
 [<c0117a42>] release_console_sem+0xd2/0xe0
 [<c01178bd>] printk+0x10d/0x170
 [<c02824f7>] usb_register_bus+0x137/0x160
 [<c0287550>] usb_hcd_pci_probe+0x2b0/0x4e0
 [<c01e5942>] pci_device_probe_static+0x52/0x70
 [<c01e599b>] __pci_device_probe+0x3b/0x50
 [<c01e59dc>] pci_device_probe+0x2c/0x50
 [<c022ba8f>] bus_match+0x3f/0x70
 [<c022bbb9>] driver_attach+0x59/0x90
 [<c022be61>] bus_add_driver+0x91/0xb0
 [<c022c31f>] driver_register+0x2f/0x40
 [<c0264430>] highlevel_for_each_host_reg+0x0/0x60
 [<c0269905>] init_ieee1394_nodemgr+0x35/0x50
 [<c01e5c5c>] pci_register_driver+0x5c/0x90
 [<c0407f63>] init+0x23/0x30
 [<c03f26dc>] do_initcalls+0x2c/0xc0
 [<c0125cf7>] init_workqueues+0x17/0x60
 [<c0100410>] init+0x0/0x170
 [<c010044a>] init+0x3a/0x170
 [<c0103d0c>] kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x14
 [<c0103d11>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x14

handlers:
[<c02832e0>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x70)
Disabling IRQ #12


I am using an ABIT-NF7-S motherboard with NFORCE2 Chipset and a Geforce FX5600. My USB Devices are a Logitech MX500 and a KeySonic keyboard. But my motherboard support USB 2.0 and other older kernels had no problem with it.

After the newest kernel upgrade to gentoo-dev-sources-2.6.7-r5, the above error happens. After I start startx I have a blank screen and nothing reacts further. (I did before I restarted a modules-update and nvidia-kernel is updated, too)

Wait on a new kernel or what is the problem?

Greetings
KpR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RAPUL
l33t
l33t


Joined: 29 Dec 2002
Posts: 664
Location: Valencia (SPAIN)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 8:58 am    Post subject: Hmmm.. Reply with quote

That it is not a problem.
If you don't have any device using irq10 then it is disabled. All the crap you see between the irq10 message and the disabling message is because of you compiled kernel with some level of debugging.
_________________
Entropy rulz world.
Redundancy sux.
World is full of redundancy.
World sux.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Souperman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@NedSeagoon: I only have a MS Optical Wheel Mouse which is probably not USB2.

Last night I tried to watch TV using tvtime and it segfaulted. This never happened with 2.6.5 and dmesg said "irq7: nobody cared!". My tv tuner was using irq7. I thought of unloading and then reloading the saa7134 module but as soon as I did 'rmmod saa7134' the system hardlocked. I think I'll go back to 2.6.5. :)
_________________
moo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phex
n00b
n00b


Joined: 08 Jun 2002
Posts: 32

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

it could be a problem with 2.6.7 on nforce/nforce2 motherboards, because i have a A7N8X DLX-E, and receive the same error but on IRQ 5. If i load the ehci_hcd module more than twice on my system, it will halt, and force me to do a hard reboot. I never came across this problem when using 2.6.6, so I might be switching back to 2.6.6 whenever I get around to rebooting this machine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gkmac
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 323
Location: West Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have an NForce 2 based motherboard and kernel 2.6.7 gives me that "irq 10: nobody cared" error along with a permanently black display when X starts (with my GeForce 5700 card).

Everyone who's complained about the nvidia video card black/corrupt X seems to be using an NForce 2 chipset (still to get definite confirmation of this). Could a so-called "improvement" in 2.6.7 regarding the NForce 2 chipset be causing these bugs?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PiniHadad
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 69

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm having a similar issue also with an nForce2 (not sure which IRQ it was- I'm not at my machine now). I saw some mention of this on the LKML but don't know if there was any resolution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeddySeagoon
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Posts: 31847
Location: 56N 3W

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gkmac,

I get the irq 10 nobody cared when I load ehci_hcd becuse I don't have any USB devices. Every else works normally. I have an nForce2 chip set with an AGP slot nVida card.

If several things share irq 10 (or any irq for that matter) and the kernel disables it, no other devices on that irq will work either.
The "nobody cared" happens when when an interrupt is raised but no service routine is installed.

Do not load the unused module(s) that are causing the nobody cared problem.
_________________
Regards,

NeddySeagoon

Computer users fall into two groups:-
those that do backups
those that have never had a hard drive fail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Souperman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hear what you are saying but I don't believe that is the solution. Fact is that I could load ehci module just fine on 2.6.5. Whether I have any USB2 devices or not is irrelevant. I might get one tomorrow and then I must load the module.
_________________
moo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bengi
n00b
n00b


Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 67
Location: East Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a stab in the dark, but when you compiled your kernel did you compile it with sleep-inside-spinlock checking enabled which is in the section called kernel hacking. As I had a similar message, and when I recompiled my kernel without sleep-inside-spinlock checking the message went away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tankred
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Posts: 33
Location: Koblenz (Germany)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gkmac wrote:
I have an NForce 2 based motherboard and kernel 2.6.7 gives me that "irq 10: nobody cared" error along with a permanently black display when X starts (with my GeForce 5700 card).

Everyone who's complained about the nvidia video card black/corrupt X seems to be using an NForce 2 chipset (still to get definite confirmation of this). Could a so-called "improvement" in 2.6.7 regarding the NForce 2 chipset be causing these bugs?


That is exactly what happens to me with 2.6.7-gentoo.

I use also an nforce2 based mobo and a geforce FX 5600. Everytime i try to startx i get a black screen. Additionally i found more in syslog what i have allready posted here: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=188870.
I also get the message "irq 11: nobody cared". You may take a look in your syslog whether you find something similar like the lines i have posted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Souperman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I re-used my 2.6.5 .config for 2.6.7 and I'm pretty sure sleep inside spinlock checking was already there in 2.6.5, so if it's enabled now, it would've been enabled in 2.6.5, which brings me back to why is it happening now and never under 2.6.5?

Nonetheless, I will check that out tomorrow, perhaps it'll make my tv tuner behave again.
_________________
moo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paranoid
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 07 Jan 2004
Posts: 290
Location: Portland, ME

PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm also getting the irq disabled message along with the error/debugging messages. I can say for a fact I have no kernel debugging options enabled. nforce2 board also-started after upgrading to gen-dev-sources-2.6.7, 2.6.5 worked fine.
_________________
A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on.
William S. Burroughs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Isaiah
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 359

PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have had this same problem with various sources also - I don't have this problem with love-sources-2.6.7_rc3-r1 however :?:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Isaiah
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 359

PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isaiah wrote:
I have had this same problem with various sources also - I don't have this problem with love-sources-2.6.7_rc3-r1 however :?:

Well, was working well for the last 9 days anyway - didn't have a problem until I posted this (go figure) :?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Souperman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, I disabled sleep-inside-spinlock and it still happens. Back to 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 for now. Works like a charm. :)
_________________
moo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joebel
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Posts: 119
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 4:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Souperman wrote:
OK, I disabled sleep-inside-spinlock and it still happens. Back to 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 for now. Works like a charm. :)


I can confirm that. 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 works like a charm.. 2.6.7 gives the irq-hll, no matter what I do. See http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=188870
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WarpFlyght
n00b
n00b


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 38
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just for the sake of adding to the numbers, I'm experiencing the same issue here with an ASUS A7N8X Deluxe (nForce2), dealing with IRQ #5 being disabled. 2.6.7-gentoo-r6 has issues, but 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 works like a charm. I used make oldconfig to generate my 2.6.7 configuration based on the 2.6.5 config file. Unfortunately on my system I see a hard hang before the system is able to reach a login prompt (verified to not be caused by a particular process loading on boot).

Thanks for the link Joebel. It's good to know about an available workaround, even if it's not the most elegant.

Does anyone know if this issue has already been reported as a bug (to Gentoo's Bugzilla or otherwise)?
_________________
Help save the world. Adopt an unanswered post.
·····························
Gentoo Linux 1.4 no more. SGI Indy R4400 on 2.6.13-mipscvs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Souperman
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 449
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 8:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally I don't usually bother with Bugzilla. It's just a horrible horrible mess and, looking at the GWN, every week there are more new bugs than closed bugs. In this case, the factors influencing my apathy are 1) the fact that 2.6.5 works just fine for me and 2), the fact that 2.6.7 doesn't offer anything over 2.6.5, so I'm not missing anything. ;)

[insert obligatory "YMMV" stuff here]
_________________
moo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WarpFlyght
n00b
n00b


Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 38
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah... Well, I'd look into reporting the issue upstream, but we're supposed to report bugs to the Gentoo devs and they'll send them upstream if necessary, etc etc etc... This issue has surely been encountered elsewhere, so we're probably in the clear, but it does seem like a good idea to get it reported to the Gentoo developers anyway, just in case. (After all, who knows... It could be the result of a Gentoo patch to the kernel.)

PiniHadad said there was discussion about it on the LKML, so that's probably a good sign that it's being taken care of. I suppose if I had more time I'd try to test some other kernel branches and see if I could work out what code is causing the problem... I don't, so hopefully the kernel maintaners do! ;)
_________________
Help save the world. Adopt an unanswered post.
·····························
Gentoo Linux 1.4 no more. SGI Indy R4400 on 2.6.13-mipscvs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Salemixu
n00b
n00b


Joined: 01 Jul 2004
Posts: 72
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi all, i think i have a similar problem, when i power on my computer it happens the same, irg 10 (or 11): nobody cared, perhaps it can be of help what i'll say, i hope so :p

I tried disabling acpi and didn't work, changing some things from kernel as somw threads said, and didn't work, and i tried some more things without success. One day (not much as i have 4 or 5 days gentoo installed on this machine, i have since february my little gentoo server :) but with kernel 2.4 )
it started working but the only thing i noticed is that the computer clock was reset, it was set at 1 january of 2002 :/ then i started trying some things and arrived at the conclusion that if i power on the machine and go to linux the irq problem happens, but if i go into windows and then soft reboot the machine and go to linux the problem doesn't happen and the integrated lan of nforce2 goes ok with fordeth drivers.
It's a very strange thing but it is the only way i managed to make it work, i don't want to change to a lower version of kernel :p

I saw in a post that there was a report in bugzilla that its name is: "gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.7 breaks forcedeth", perhaps is the same thing, but anyway, here you have the link to it:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54639

Any help to fix it is welcome :D
bye!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Isaiah
Guru
Guru


Joined: 25 Feb 2003
Posts: 359

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Salemixu wrote:
...then i started trying some things and arrived at the conclusion that if i power on the machine and go to linux the irq problem happens, but if i go into windows and then soft reboot the machine and go to linux the problem doesn't happen and the integrated lan of nforce2 goes ok with fordeth drivers.
It's a very strange thing but it is the only way i managed to make it work...

That's very interesting - as much suspected the same thing was happening here :?:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cerement
Guru
Guru


Joined: 14 Jun 2003
Posts: 404

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This problem has come up several times on #gentoo. So far as everyone can tell, its being caused by some funky code in the ehci (USB 2.0) driver. When the ehci_hcd module gets initialized (built in or modprobe), it scans the bus and, for some reason, determines some IRQ is not in use and promptly disables it (in my case, it was the IRQ for my AGP slot -- no 3D accel). The only solution anyone's been able to find so far is to disable ehci completely (ie. set to 'N' in kernel config -- if you set to 'M' and have hotplug running, hotplug will try to load it anyways) and resorting to the default uhci (USB 1.0) or the legacy ohci drivers ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
carsten90
n00b
n00b


Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, I'm so happy, that I'm not the only one having this problem... I'm not as stupid as I thought :)

ehci disables IRQ 11 in my case. Thats probably the problem, why I cant get alsa working -> my AC97 controller is at IRQ 11.

I cannot use a USB 2.0 device, it causes a
usb 1-2: control timeout on ep0out
usb 1-2: device not accepting address 14, error -110

Well, but it notices the device....

Greetings

Carsten
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum