Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Benchmarking ut2k4 demo
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gamers & Players
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lamer0
n00b
n00b


Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:22 am    Post subject: Benchmarking ut2k4 demo Reply with quote

Save benchmark.sh into ut2004demo/Benchmark dir.

Code:

#!/bin/sh
../ut2004demo dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt $*


Save botmatchexec.txt in ut2004demo/Benchmark/Stuff

Code:

showhud
ship


Run the Benchmark and post the results / system info.
Benchmark results in ~/.ut2004demo/Benchmark dir

Mine:
athlon xp1800@1.75ghz (166fsb) / 512 ram / geforceti4600 / 5336 nvidia drivers

Going to re-run the test with the xp1800 running at 1.82ghz see if it helps the fps any.

dm-rankin
16.560684 / 54.121933 / 173.402466 fps
Score = 53.688744
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the lone crouton
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 11 Aug 2003
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

19.296822 / 54.756439 / 169.507797 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 54.284588


XP2600/512MBpc2700/GF4Ti4200/2.4.20-gaming-sources/43.63 drivers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
himpierre
l33t
l33t


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 845
Location: Berlin

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86-64 Linux
Unknown processor @ 2003 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchma
rk -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini-exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

28.596342 / 78.571991 / 173.701935 fps rand[1049344192]
Score = 73.384811
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grover
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 27 Sep 2002
Posts: 77
Location: Melbourne, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2169 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

17.729950 / 56.111809 / 151.388306 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 55.516609
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Swift
n00b
n00b


Joined: 09 Jun 2002
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the benchmark excites with:
Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".

the game itself runs without any problem...
anyone knows how to fix?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blackhole
n00b
n00b


Joined: 14 Sep 2003
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1804 MHz
RADEON 9700 PRO x86/MMX/3DNow!/SSE

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchma
rk -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

2.615759 / 14.122698 / 53.081150 fps rand[823438765]
Score = 14.126121

i'm also getting the Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error,

is that kind of performance normal with ati drivers (i'm using 3.70) or is something wrong with my system?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trINItr0n_
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 44
Location: Belgium::Leuven

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2071 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

14.166430 / 41.299141 / 150.046814 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 41.066727

running 2.6.2-gentoo-r1/512 ram/amd barton 2500 @ 166x12.5
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
windsok
n00b
n00b


Joined: 20 Oct 2003
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1545 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

11.040814 / 36.640057 / 105.341064 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 36.634865

slackware-current (2.4.24)
Athlon XP 1800+
512MB DDR DRAM
Geforce 2 GTS 64MB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Uranus
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 May 2002
Posts: 438
Location: Portugal, Braga

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1400 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

6.825200 / 24.210106 / 90.555168 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 24.213776
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zakk
l33t
l33t


Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 613
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Swift wrote:
the benchmark excites with:
Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0".

the game itself runs without any problem...
anyone knows how to fix?

http://icculus.org/lgfaq/#launcheveryxig

You'll have to find another culprit for why it exits.
_________________
--zakk
I run and post at:
http://www.linuxgames.com/
http://www.timedoctor.org/
http://www.icculus.org/lgfaq/
http://www.ioquake3.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
(l)user
Guru
Guru


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 334
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1394 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

10.063552 / 26.078394 / 68.335289 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 26.082407

athlon xp 1600+
Geforce 2 GTS 64 mb ddr
512 ram ddr (266)
_________________
Registered Linux user #302020
Gadu Gadu #490092
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mailportugal
n00b
n00b


Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Linux xxx 2.4.22-gentoo-r2 #1 Qua Dez 24 22:38:34 WET 2003 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496-r3

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 2406 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4400/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

10.190522 / 49.977371 / 142.187653 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 49.710190
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sgaap
l33t
l33t


Joined: 16 Aug 2002
Posts: 754
Location: Enschede, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1667 MHz
GeForce FX 5900/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
dm-rankin
4.520851 / 21.064482 / 71.450638 fps rand[1814308868]

Score = 21.062794

agp: nvagp @ 2x
nvidia driver: 1.0.5336
chipset: kt133a
memory: 384mb pc133@133
amd xp 2000+@1666mhz

Maybe its time to upgrade my mobo and mem :P
_________________
In "old" Europe we already have a word for "pre-emptive strikes" mr Bush: its called "war"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edave
n00b
n00b


Joined: 28 Sep 2003
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 1830 MHz
GeForce2 GTS/PCI/SSE/3DNOW!

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

10.913903 / 23.713099 / 125.413025 fps rand[1814308868]
Score = 23.692850
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wedge_
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 08 Aug 2002
Posts: 3614
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AuthenticAMD PentiumPro-class processor @ 2205 MHz
Radeon 9800 (AIB) Athlon (3DNow!)

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=../Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

17.854683 / 53.148735 / 144.163788 fps rand[2032932547]
Score = 52.405056


@blackhole: the 3.7.0 drivers are pretty crap in UT2K3/2K4 for me. The 3.2.8 driver should be a lot better.
_________________
Per Ardua Ad Astra
The Earth is the cradle of the mind, but we cannot live forever in a cradle - Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky
Gentoo Radeon FAQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNKyDeth
n00b
n00b


Joined: 13 Dec 2003
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get that Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error also. It happens everytime in the sameplace in the benchmark. When the guy runs up the wooden sloped plank and fires 2 maybe 3 rockets.

I been looking for a fix cause I really wanted to see what my system could do in it.
A64 3400+
Chaintech ZNF3-150
1gig Corsair Pc3200LL XMS
GFFX 5900se
SB Audigy2zs

BTW, I have tried all nvidia drivers from 4496 on up to 5336. None of them fixed the problem from what I could see. :(
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DarrenM
l33t
l33t


Joined: 25 Apr 2002
Posts: 653
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If anyone is dual booting 64 and 32 bit installs I'd love to see the performance from both systems. I know the 64 bit isn't supposed to be all that optimised but it'd still be interesting to see.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zakk
l33t
l33t


Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 613
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MNKyDeth wrote:
I get that Xlib: extension "XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD" missing on display ":0.0". error also. It happens everytime in the sameplace in the benchmark. When the guy runs up the wooden sloped plank and fires 2 maybe 3 rockets.

I been looking for a fix cause I really wanted to see what my system could do in it.
A64 3400+
Chaintech ZNF3-150
1gig Corsair Pc3200LL XMS
GFFX 5900se
SB Audigy2zs

BTW, I have tried all nvidia drivers from 4496 on up to 5336. None of them fixed the problem from what I could see. :(

...
The XiG-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD message is useless. It is there simply for people who have purchased the X server from XiG (which adds nothing, though you can find them at http://www.xig.com.)
_________________
--zakk
I run and post at:
http://www.linuxgames.com/
http://www.timedoctor.org/
http://www.icculus.org/lgfaq/
http://www.ioquake3.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ashtray
n00b
n00b


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I get the same thing on Radeon 9600 Pro with drivers 3.2.8 and 3.7.0 kernel 2.4.22.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crazycat
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 838
Location: Hamburg, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got it on my amd64 3000+, 1024MB@166 running 64 bit version of ut2k4

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86-64 Linux
Unknown processor @ 2010 MHz
GeForce4 Ti 4200/AGP/SSE2

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=true?numbots=12?quickstart=true?attractcam=true -benchmark -seconds=77 -in$

33.064117 / 86.589905 / 182.003525 fps rand[904465829]
Score = 76.442833

It is strange , i get even more score than a guy with a same cpu but fx5900 instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
himpierre
l33t
l33t


Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 845
Location: Berlin

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

It is strange , i get even more score than a guy with a same cpu but fx5900 instead


Indeed. Really strange. :-)

regards
Thomas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lamer0
n00b
n00b


Joined: 31 Mar 2003
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks for all the replies. Seems ut2k4 is very cpu dependant. Interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crazycat
l33t
l33t


Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 838
Location: Hamburg, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And that means i can still live with my beloved ti4200 for a year or two :D
btw , does anyone know how to overclock geforce on amd64? nvclock is now working and i get nice 300/600 compared to original 250/513 in windows.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cduchesne
n00b
n00b


Joined: 21 Apr 2003
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
x86 Linux
AMD Athlon64 3200+ (2000.043 Mhz)
Corsair 1 GB PC3200 (CAS 2-3-3)
GeForce FX 5900XT (driver v. 5336)

26.773998 / 78.098778 / 235.808655 fps -- rand[1814308868]

Score = 70.436974
_________________
WX
MSI K8T Neo
Athlon64 3200+
GF4 Ti4400
1024 MB PC3200
Gentoo 1.4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trINItr0n_
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Feb 2004
Posts: 44
Location: Belgium::Leuven

PostPosted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks for mentioning nvclock, looks very handy ... but got strange results in this test: overclocked my Gainward ti4200 (very good overclocker) from a default 250MHz/444MHz to 310MHz/550MHz, and i actually get worse results 8O
Under windows with these settings it gives quite an impressive boost, but linux seems not to like it tho :(

Any ideas about this ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gamers & Players All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 1 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum