View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tsonn Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 550
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 11:04 am Post subject: Gnome 2.8 on amd64? [YES!... mostly] |
|
|
Has anyone tried it yet? It's hit ~x86 now, apparently. _________________ If your question was answered, please edit the first post and add [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks!
Last edited by Tsonn on Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dangertools Apprentice
Joined: 29 Dec 2003 Posts: 278 Location: Saalfelden, Austria
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
it is ~amd64 now too. i install it right now
dangertools |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malloc l33t
Joined: 19 Sep 2003 Posts: 762
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please tell us how it went, since i've heard about some problems in x86. _________________ --> Linux ### 2.6.11-ck2 #1 Sat Mar 12 20:21:30 WET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux <-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
crazycat l33t
Joined: 26 Aug 2003 Posts: 838 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no problems here (allthough i use only metacity and gnome-panel from gnome and rox for everything else ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tsonn Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 550
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ooh, I hadn't noticed it was in ~amd64 as well.
Remember, folks, using ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is bad for your system! Here's a guess at what you should add to /etc/portage/package.keywords (stolen from the ~x86 version and mangled slightly):
Code: |
# Gnome 2.8 ~amd64
app-arch/file-roller ~amd64
app-editors/gedit ~amd64
app-text/ggv ~amd64
app-text/gpdf ~amd64
dev-libs/atk ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome ~amd64
gnome-base/libgnome ~amd64
gnome-base/librsvg ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-keyring ~amd64
gnome-base/control-center ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-applets ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-vfs ~amd64
gnome-base/libgnomeui ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-volume-manager ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-panel ~amd64
gnome-base/libbonobo ~amd64
gnome-base/libbonoboui ~amd64
gnome-base/libgnomecanvas ~amd64
gnome-base/orbit ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-desktop ~amd64
gnome-base/gnome-session ~amd64
gnome-base/gconf ~amd64
gnome-base/libgtop ~amd64
gnome-base/nautilus ~amd64
gnome-base/eel ~amd64
gnome-extra/bug-buddy ~amd64
gnome-extra/gal ~amd64
gnome-extra/evolution-data-server ~amd64
gnome-extra/zenity ~amd64
gnome-extra/gnome-system-monitor ~amd64
gnome-extra/gnome-media ~amd64
gnome-extra/gnome-utils ~amd64
gnome-extra/gconf-editor ~amd64
gnome-extra/libgtkhtml ~amd64
mail-client/evolution ~amd64
media-gfx/eog ~amd64
net-libs/libsoup ~amd64
net-misc/vino ~amd64
net-www/epiphany ~amd64
sys-apps/hal ~amd64
sys-apps/dbus ~amd64
x11-libs/libwnck ~amd64
x11-libs/pango ~amd64
x11-wm/metacity ~amd64
x11-terms/gnome-terminal ~amd64
x11-themes/gnome-themes ~amd64
x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme ~amd64
net-analyzer/gnome-netstatus ~amd64
gnome-base/libgnomeprint ~amd64
gnome-base/libgnomeprintui ~amd64
gnome-extra/nautilus-cd-burner ~amd64
x11-libs/startup-notification ~amd64
app-admin/gnome-system-tools ~amd64
net-analyzer/gnome-nettool ~amd64
media-sound/esound ~amd64
gnome-extra/gcalctool ~amd64
x11-libs/gtk+ ~amd64
dev-util/intltool ~amd64
dev-libs/libxslt ~amd64
x11-libs/libxklavier ~amd64
gnome-extra/evolution-webcal ~amd64
media-libs/gstreamer ~amd64
dev-util/desktop-file-utils ~amd64
dev-libs/libcroco ~amd64
dev-libs/libxml2 ~amd64
gnome-extra/yelp ~amd64
media-libs/gst-plugins ~amd64
media-plugins/gst-plugins-oss ~amd64
media-plugins/gst-plugins-esd ~amd64
media-plugins/gst-plugins-alsa ~amd64
gnome-base/gdm ~amd64
dev-libs/libIDL ~amd64
dev-libs/glib ~amd64
x11-libs/vte ~amd64
gnome-extra/gnome2-user-docs ~amd64
x11-misc/shared-mime-info ~amd64
|
Compiling it now, I will report back _________________ If your question was answered, please edit the first post and add [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oggialli Guru
Joined: 27 May 2004 Posts: 389 Location: Finland, near Tampere
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Judging from the above, I'll stick to what I have done always - ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in make.conf. _________________ IBM Thinkpad T42P - Gentoo Linux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tsonn Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 550
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want to use ~amd64 for everything, adding it in make.conf is fine.
The problem comes if (like me) you want to use amd64 for most things, and only use ~amd64 when it's needed. Then you have to use package.keywords, otherwise portage will want to downgrade things to their amd64 versions. (And specifying a global ACCEPT_KEYWORDS during the compile will mean you end up with more ~amd64 packages than you need). _________________ If your question was answered, please edit the first post and add [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JLP Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Sep 2003 Posts: 143 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It compiled just fine but I have some problems. Epiphany web browser doesn't even start. users-admin also crashes right after start. _________________ Live long and prosper! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tsonn Guru
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Posts: 550
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I made it ... most things seem to be working fine.
Epiphany doesn't work... here's the error message:
Code: |
epiphany: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/mozilla/components/libnecko.so: undefined symbol: PR_GetAddrInfoByName
|
I'm not too bothered, since I use Opera. _________________ If your question was answered, please edit the first post and add [SOLVED] to the title. Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HotBBQ Apprentice
Joined: 03 Mar 2004 Posts: 275 Location: West Melbourne, FL
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Everything is OK for me execpt Evolution. Apparently it doesn't like IMAP. Everything else seems to be in order. All ~ system here. _________________ "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n3x Apprentice
Joined: 14 Apr 2003 Posts: 247 Location: Kingston, Ontario (uni) Westport, CT (home)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Everything installed fine for me, but it is unbearably slow. 2.6 worked fine, but with 2.8 it's so slow I can't even scroll through webpages. FVWM and flux work fine.
top shows X running at anywhere from 20%CPU all the way up to 98% when I'm using 2.8. Memory usage is fine. gdm isn't showing any noticeable slowdown either. It's only when I'm in gnome that it becomes impossible to use.
9800pro, msi k8n neo platinum, 1gb ram, 3400+
Anyone have any idea what this could be?
EDIT: Xorg 6.8.0 in case it matters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StinkingMonkey Apprentice
Joined: 24 May 2003 Posts: 183 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ive been using it for about 2 weeks now, all works well, no issues with it at all, only thing i want is for me to be able to rename devices found by hal, but apparently thats coming at some point, which is great because hal is excellent, recognises all drives, cd-roms etc and mounts them. _________________ Intel Q6600, Asus P5N32-E SLI, Audigy2 ZS, Gainward 7950 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stefankl n00b
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
n3x wrote: | Everything installed fine for me, but it is unbearably slow. 2.6 worked fine, but with 2.8 it's so slow I can't even scroll through webpages. FVWM and flux work fine. |
If you are using Xorg 6.8.0 turn off the Composite Option in your xorg.conf. _________________ LUG-Camp 05.05.-08.05.05 in Wuppertal! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n3x Apprentice
Joined: 14 Apr 2003 Posts: 247 Location: Kingston, Ontario (uni) Westport, CT (home)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2004 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stefankl wrote: | n3x wrote: | Everything installed fine for me, but it is unbearably slow. 2.6 worked fine, but with 2.8 it's so slow I can't even scroll through webpages. FVWM and flux work fine. |
If you are using Xorg 6.8.0 turn off the Composite Option in your xorg.conf. |
Lovely, thank you!
Cheers,
james |
|
Back to top |
|
|
herbie Guru
Joined: 09 Oct 2002 Posts: 319 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
HotBBQ wrote: | Everything is OK for me execpt Evolution. Apparently it doesn't like IMAP. Everything else seems to be in order. All ~ system here. |
To get evolution to work you need to edit two lines in /etc/services
-imap2 143/tcp # Interim Mail Access Proto v2
-imap2 143/udp
+imap2 143/tcp imap # Interim Mail Access P 2 and 4
+imap2 143/udp imap
see bug 66166, will be fixed in the next baselayout. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
btlee Apprentice
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 168 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tsonn wrote: | Well, I made it ... most things seem to be working fine.
Epiphany doesn't work... here's the error message:
Code: |
epiphany: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/mozilla/components/libnecko.so: undefined symbol: PR_GetAddrInfoByName
|
I'm not too bothered, since I use Opera. |
I found the workaround of epiphany startup failure.
For my case, following line works fine.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/mozilla:/usr/lib epiphany
I have found that epiphany 1.2.9-r1 works fine without some patches.
However, i don't know why the problem happens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dlm1065 Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Mon Oct 11, 2004 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
btlee wrote: | Tsonn wrote: | Well, I made it ... most things seem to be working fine.
Epiphany doesn't work... here's the error message:
Code: |
epiphany: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/mozilla/components/libnecko.so: undefined symbol: PR_GetAddrInfoByName
|
I'm not too bothered, since I use Opera. |
I found the workaround of epiphany startup failure.
For my case, following line works fine.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/mozilla:/usr/lib epiphany
I have found that epiphany 1.2.9-r1 works fine without some patches.
However, i don't know why the problem happens. |
I was reinstalling my system so I did a
2.8 bombed on epiphany requiring that USE have gtk2 in it for
epiphany so I am thinking that has to have something
to do with that |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|