View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
io333 n00b
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:30 pm Post subject: Has anyone tried Mozilla 1.1 beta yet? |
|
|
I'm very very afraid to try this puppy while masked. But I'd love to have the F11 full screen option back.
Are there any reports from out there in the field?
Of note, I've tried the windows version of the puppy (under XP) and it is a FREEZEMONSTER!
In contrast moz 1.0 is quite nice on both platforms and I wouldn't even bother caring if 1.0 under linux hadn't had the fullscreen option removed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CYwolf n00b
Joined: 01 Jun 2002 Posts: 47 Location: Toronto, ON, CA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2002 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check the Desktop forum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rizzo Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 1067 Location: Manitowoc, WI, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have it and it r00ls. I didn't even know about the F11 thing, but I just hit it and it works sweet.
Unmask and go, brother. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xorbe n00b
Joined: 19 Jul 2002 Posts: 46 Location: near San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rizzo wrote: | Unmask and go, brother. |
Or grab the tarball from mozilla.org, and unzip to ~/local
and mv mozilla mozilla-1.1b (that's what I do).
I've noticed... Moz compiled on gentoo does antialiasing,
whereas the mozilla.org tarballs don't.
xorbe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rizzo Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 1067 Location: Manitowoc, WI, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anti-aliasing isn't a bad thing once you get it working. With 1.1a and 1.1b, anti-aliasing started working right out of the emerge and I've been pleased as punch.
The hour-long compile makes for some boring downtime though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
syadnom Guru
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 531
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 8:13 pm Post subject: if i emerge it : |
|
|
will mozilla 1.1b coexist with my existing mozilla?, of coarse it will overwrite the link to /bin , but it will install in /usr/lib/mozilla1.1b or something right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nitro322 Guru
Joined: 24 Jul 2002 Posts: 594 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
probably not by default if you emerge it. For installing in a separate directory, your best best would probably be to download the source yourself and compile it using --prefix=/usr/local/mozilla11b (whatever else you want). That'll allow you to play with it while still easily going back to 1.0. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rommel Veteran
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 1145 Location: Williamsburg Virginia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
go ahead and unmask it and emerge unmerge your old mozilla and emerge 1.1b...you'll like it...it hasnt been any problem and its seems way faster then 1.0r-3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mellofone Apprentice
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's working pretty well for me, except for one change that REALLY pi$$es me off....
When you right click on a link, it opens a menu where I usually use "Open Link in a new Tab". Well they switched the positions of "open in new tab" and "open in a new window".
Damnit! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rizzo Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 1067 Location: Manitowoc, WI, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mellofone wrote: | they switched the positions of "open in new tab" and "open in a new window". |
Open in a New Window is on top of the menu for me and always has been, AFAIK. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nitro322 Guru
Joined: 24 Jul 2002 Posts: 594 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Open Link in New Window had always been, up until version 1.0, at the top of the menu, with Open Link in New Tab scond in the list (since that feature was added, of course). At version 1.0 they were switched, and with version 1.1a they were switched back to having New Window on top. I, for one, welcome the return. Almost every browser in existance has Open in New Window at the top (except for IE, but we already know it's got issues), and I hated having to actually think about where I needed to click to open links in a new window. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
syadnom Guru
Joined: 09 May 2002 Posts: 531
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 10:55 pm Post subject: currently |
|
|
im currently trying mozilla1.1b from the precompiles version, i just dl and tar -zxvf it to /usr/lib/mozilla1.1b/
and then linked my plugins folder to my 1.0 pluggins directory...works good, but i may just get the source and compile it here soon, any big performance differences between the precompiled and a selfcompiled version? i dont really want to compile the whole damned thing for a beta, id prefer to wait until 1.1 final and just emerge it in.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Erukian n00b
Joined: 03 Jul 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Tacoma, Washington USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2002 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I first used the moz1.1b on windows. Worked great. So when I built my gentoo1.3b system with gcc3.2-pre I tried it out. No problems whatsoever. It seems gnome2 is more buggy than the browser. And that says a lot for its stability as a beta.
Great stuff! Try it out! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cr0t l33t
Joined: 27 Apr 2002 Posts: 944 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I tried it but I do not like the stupid d/l Manager. _________________ cya |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mellofone Apprentice
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cr0t wrote: | Yes, I tried it but I do not like the stupid d/l Manager. |
Remove it. Edit -> Preferences -> Downloads |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rizzo Retired Dev
Joined: 30 Apr 2002 Posts: 1067 Location: Manitowoc, WI, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
mellofone wrote: | Remove it. Edit -> Preferences -> Downloads |
It's actually Edit -> Preferences -> Navigator -> Downloads
You can choose the download manager, the normal progress window, or nothing at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mellofone Apprentice
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
rizzo wrote: | It's actually Edit -> Preferences -> Navigator -> Downloads
You can choose the download manager, the normal progress window, or nothing at all. |
I was close enough, Navigator always opens up first anyway |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dimitri Guru
Joined: 24 Jul 2002 Posts: 373 Location: Niederbayern/Germany
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does anyone know, if galeno and plugins already work with gcc3.1??
Mozilla 1.0 can not use java when compiled with 3.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rommel Veteran
Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 1145 Location: Williamsburg Virginia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i kinda like the download manager feature |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cr0t l33t
Joined: 27 Apr 2002 Posts: 944 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 30, 2002 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rizzo wrote: | mellofone wrote: | Remove it. Edit -> Preferences -> Downloads |
It's actually Edit -> Preferences -> Navigator -> Downloads
You can choose the download manager, the normal progress window, or nothing at all. |
thX _________________ cya |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dioxmat Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 May 2002 Posts: 709 Location: /home/mat
|
Posted: Wed Jul 31, 2002 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
xorbe wrote: | rizzo wrote: | Unmask and go, brother. |
Or grab the tarball from mozilla.org, and unzip to ~/local
and mv mozilla mozilla-1.1b (that's what I do).
I've noticed... Moz compiled on gentoo does antialiasing,
whereas the mozilla.org tarballs don't.
xorbe |
because mozilla ebuilds apply a patch to the default unix.js to enable aa.
but you can do it yourself :) _________________ mat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tactless l33t
Joined: 14 Jul 2002 Posts: 642 Location: Mitzpe Adi, Israel
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2002 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Antialiasing sure looks good, but it's just too slow on my PC... I have a PIII 450mhz, and when browsing sites with lots of dense text, rendering can take whole seconds... _________________ Tactless
"If it wasn't for fog, the world would run at a really crappy framerate."
Jabber: tactless@amessage.info |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mellofone Apprentice
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2002 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tactless wrote: | Antialiasing sure looks good, but it's just too slow on my PC... I have a PIII 450mhz, and when browsing sites with lots of dense text, rendering can take whole seconds... |
I'm not sure why, but I'm not a big fan of the AA. All of the letters look blurry and squished together. Is that how they are supposed to look? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dioxmat Bodhisattva
Joined: 04 May 2002 Posts: 709 Location: /home/mat
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2002 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have some screenshots of mozilla AA @ http://mpillard.free.fr/mozilla (some are quite old... you can see AA before tweaking the prefs and after :) ... _________________ mat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mellofone Apprentice
Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 287
|
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2002 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dunno. Maybe I am just too used to the way it USED to look pre-AA. It just doesn't look right. Oh well |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|