View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
schorsch_76 Guru
Joined: 19 Jun 2012 Posts: 450
|
Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 9:11 am Post subject: network fails to start: /etc/init.d/net.eth0: line 555 |
|
|
Code: |
etc/init.d/net.eth0 start
* Bringing up interface eth0
/etc/init.d/net.eth0: line 555: _exists: command not found
* ERROR: interface eth0 does not exist
* Ensure that you have loaded the correct kernel module for your hardware
* ERROR: net.eth0 failed to start
|
Code: |
ifconfig
eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.178.19 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.178.255
inet6 fd00::12bf:48ff:fe89:b285 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x0<global>
inet6 fe80::12bf:48ff:fe89:b285 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link>
ether 10:bf:48:89:b2:85 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 2406 bytes 2705022 (2.5 MiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1562 bytes 325835 (318.1 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 0 (Lokale Schleife)
RX packets 6 bytes 380 (380.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 6 bytes 380 (380.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
|
Code: | equery b /etc/init.d/net.lo
* Searching for /etc/init.d/net.lo ...
net-misc/netifrc-0.1 (/etc/init.d/net.lo)
|
i already reemerged net-misc/netifrc but it did not change. What can i do?
I did start my network manually with ifconfig/route to write this lines.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
krinn Watchman
Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 7470
|
Posted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try resync and rebuild netifrc, there's a problem with your net.lo that i suppose is already fixed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
schorsch_76 Guru
Joined: 19 Jun 2012 Posts: 450
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
krinn Watchman
Joined: 02 May 2003 Posts: 7470
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
but the file is in the package as you shown us.
I think you can have such problem when not using the update net.lo yet (don't run etc-update) or discard the update when using etc-update, or removed the protection on that file (in make.conf) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|