Vieri l33t
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 Posts: 877
|
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:43 am Post subject: network packet loss |
|
|
Hi,
I'm having weird network issues on a Gentoo box I'm using as a gateway.
When it boots it works fine for some time.
At some point it starts losing packets on all of its ethernet ports (so it's not a NIC issue).
Rebooting the server makes the network work fine again for a while until the issue comes up again.
This is what I tried right before rebooting the server:
Code: |
# ping -I eth1 google.com
PING google.com (173.194.34.227) from 192.168.228.1 eth1: 56(84) bytes of data.
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=47.1 ms
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=46.1 ms
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=46.5 ms
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=11 ttl=56 time=47.2 ms
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=12 ttl=56 time=46.9 ms
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=17 ttl=56 time=46.9 ms
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=18 ttl=56 time=46.5 ms
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
64 bytes from mad01s09-in-f3.1e100.net (173.194.34.227): icmp_seq=20 ttl=56 time=46.8 ms
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
|
The iptables are not modified so I really don't know what could be happening (must it be iptables-related or could it be something else?).
I'm also scanning for rootkits just in case.
What else could I try?
Thanks,
Vieri |
|