| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ZagiFlyer Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 93 Location: San Jose, CA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think it's portage, I think it's gcc giving a new format of version information. I'm using gcc 3.2-r1.
I continue to get the gcc check error referenced in this thread (checking the GNU gcc compiler version...) in spite of a new rsync and upgrade of portage (to 2.0.36).
Bugzilla shows this as fixed. Should I re-open it? _________________ "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy"
--Ben Franklin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyron Apprentice


Joined: 26 Aug 2002 Posts: 198 Location: Montreal, Qc.
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think that the present version of the openoffice needs to be patched (or actually apply the patch) so that it compiles with GCC 3.2...
PS: Timmmyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy _________________ M$ Windows: When in doubt, REBOOT
Linux: When in doubt, RTFM  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brain Apprentice


Joined: 16 May 2002 Posts: 229 Location: Farmington Hills, MI
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kyron wrote: | Uhm...I did so yesterday night and I still had the same problem....
did
emerge rsync
then
emerge portage
hmmmm......did I perform emerge portage before emerge openoffice....(damned...can't remember....DOH!) |
The bug fix confirmation came just recently, so it's possible that there's an even newer version of Portage out there--might want to check again. _________________ --brain |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheCoop Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ditto on gcc version problem
rsyncing & installing portage 2.0.36 (oooooooooh! new make.conf!)
DOES NOT
fix the gcc 3.2 --version error, I dont have the necessary experience to fix this but im sure someone will oblidge... _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scottro Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2002 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still not working here either, at least on 1.4 beta.
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyron Apprentice


Joined: 26 Aug 2002 Posts: 198 Location: Montreal, Qc.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2002 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TheCoop wrote: | | fix the gcc 3.2 --version error, I dont have the necessary experience to fix this but im sure someone will oblidge... |
Well...if someone gives me a few pointers...I'd gladly dip into it  _________________ M$ Windows: When in doubt, REBOOT
Linux: When in doubt, RTFM  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheCoop Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2002 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
c'mon, im sure someone will be able to fix this
im thinking that openoffice-bin is out of the question, since that will have been compiled under gcc 3.1, and gcc 3.2 libraries are not compatable...coudl someone either confirm or correct this pls? _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scottro Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2002 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can confirm that 95 percent of computer errors are between chair and keyboard.
Ok, on a 1-4_beta, freshly installed, fresh portage, fresh rsync. openoffice-bin compiled and runs without errors. As I've mentioned, another thread gave me the key to an earlier problem for me, having to do with lib paths--I did this as root (not su to root, but logged in as root).
HTH
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SQLBoy Guru


Joined: 17 Aug 2002 Posts: 381
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you want open office download it from OpenOffice.org or install the binaries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyron Apprentice


Joined: 26 Aug 2002 Posts: 198 Location: Montreal, Qc.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2002 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SQLBoy wrote: | | If you want open office download it from OpenOffice.org or install the binaries. |
Wow!!!...what a lame-ass non constructive response!
Download binaries == Not in the Gentoo philosophy...not compiled and optimized as per my settings...
Download from OpenOffice.org == Not a clean system...
A preferable answer would have been to say to make a patch and submit an ebuild...
This is not a Mandrake/RedHat forum BTW... _________________ M$ Windows: When in doubt, REBOOT
Linux: When in doubt, RTFM  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodm Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 18 Jun 2002 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 5:30 am Post subject: After messing around with it for a while... |
|
|
Ok, so I've emerged portage, world, and even gcc-3.2-r1. All of this after a good rsync-ing of course.
Here is the fun stuff I get now!
[mascot:~] > sudo emerge openoffice
Password:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge app-office/openoffice-1.0.1 to /
>>> md5 OOo_1.0.1_source.tar.bz2
>>> md5 STLport-4.5.3.tar.gz
>>> md5 gpc231.tar.Z
* ****************************************************************
* To get this thing to build at all, I had to use less agressive
* CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. If this build thus fails, and you edited
* this ebuild at all, or used too agressive compiler flags ...
*
* You HAVE been Warned!
*
* ****************************************************************
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking OOo_1.0.1_source.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking gpc231.tar.Z
* Applying patches...
patching file config_office/configure.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 808 with fuzz 2.
patching file config_office/configure
patching file product/util/makefile.mk
patching file product/inc/scp/udk_basefiles.scp
Hunk #2 succeeded at 23 (offset -1 lines).
patching file solenv/inc/_tg_zip.mk
Hunk #1 succeeded at 163 with fuzz 1.
patching file tools/bootstrp/makefile.mk
patching file config_office/configure.in
Hunk #4 succeeded at 824 (offset 4 lines).
patching file config_office/set_soenv.1
Hunk #3 succeeded at 146 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1520 (offset 54 lines).
patching file solenv/inc/unxlngi3.mk
patching file solenv/inc/unxlngi4.mk
Hunk #2 succeeded at 146 (offset -1 lines).
patching file solenv/inc/unxlngppc.mk
patching file solenv/inc/unxlngppc4.mk
patching file solenv/inc/unxlngi4.mk
patching file solenv/inc/unxlngppc4.mk
patching file solenv/bin/build.pl
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 67.
2 out of 21 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file solenv/bin/build.pl.rej
!!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
!!! Function src_unpack, Line 69, Exitcode 1
!!! (no error message)
Wow, I love it. No error message. Um, does anyone have a clue what Hunks are?
The warning about agressive cflags and cxflags is rather vague. What would be considered a non-aggressive set of flags? I will fidgit and see what I can do. But hopefully someone smarter than I (... most of you...) will know what's up here. _________________ There are thousands of types of people in this world:
The type that seperates people into two groups,
and the thousands of other types. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scottro Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
A hunk is err, a hunk of code is perhaps a decent description. Take a look at man patch which gives a better description of the whole process.
As for me, I'm still sticking with openoffice-bin. Others have had bad results with it (I forget if it was mentioned on forums, the gentoo-user list or private email) but it really has worked as well for me on 1.4 as doing an emerge on 1.2
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheCoop Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
i got exactly the same error msg (with -march=athlon-tbird -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer.
however, i dont think it is a cflags error, the merge failed while unpacking, which would suggest that one of the tarballs is dodgy _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scottro Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On a fresh install, just found that openoffice-bin isn't going correctly either. It installs without apparent problem, but when I run setup, I receive an error message about copying various xpms.
Sigh, it was working (that is openoffice-bin installation) just a couple of weeks ago (see my earlier posts)
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheCoop Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this is just so depressing...
where is the openoffice ebuild blokey anyway? _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scottro Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 13 Apr 2002 Posts: 141 Location: New York City
|
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2002 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is a bit depressing, but on the bright side--downloading direct from openoffice.org worked--a few weeks ago, that didn't.
I'd rather have the Gentoo version though--possibly because of using my cjk flags, with the Gentoo version, I can easily input Japanese. With the English version taken from OpenOffice.org, I can't. I imagine I'll be able to after fooling around a bit, but the simple solution mentioned in their help didn't work. With Gentoo, there was nothing to it.
Oh well, it's just that and the fact that I can't get sound in lbreakout2 that are holding me back from redoing my whole workstation. Soon, I suspect both will be fixed.
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rasmus n00b

Joined: 14 Jul 2002 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 11:45 am Post subject: Finally! |
|
|
If anyone missed it, the flakey patch has now been replaced and Oo finally compiled on my Athlon XP 1500+. Strangely enough, my first attemt to compile died after a few hours of compiling, while the second attempt worked. Oo 1.0.0 also exhibited this behaviour. Damaged RAM?
My system is an 1.1 system that's been upgraded to 1.4 and GCC-3.2. Now, let's see if my PIII/850 laptop, running a "pure" GCC 3.2 system, will also compile Oo. It has heat problems, time for me to pray it won't melt during the compile.
Anyone who has built Oo on a GCC-3.2-only system?
/Rasmus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheCoop Veteran


Joined: 15 Jun 2002 Posts: 1814 Location: Where you least expect it
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2002 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i will build it overnight (ive got a gcc 3.2-1.4 only system), ill tell you the results in the morning... _________________ 95% of all computer errors occur between chair and keyboard (TM)
"One World, One web, One program" - Microsoft Promo ad.
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer" - Adolf Hitler
Change the world - move a rock |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|