Benchmarking thread

[defer-]

Lets have benchmarking thread. Post your benchmarking results. Also feel free to suggest new benchmarks.

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Benchmarking

Thinkpad R500
Intel C2D T5870 @ 2.00GHz, Intel MHD4500, 3GB RAM, 64GB SSD, 15" 1280x800. Configured for minimal power usage.

~ $ warsow +exec profiles/high+.cfg +timedemo 1 +cg_showFPS 1 +cl_maxfps 999 +cl_checkForUpdate 0 +demo pts-demo10 +next "quit" +r_mode -1
876 frames, 76.1 seconds: 11.5 fps

~ # time emerge -1 coreutils
real 2m33.483s
user 2m6.310s
sys 0m55.257s

~ $ ramspeed -b1 -m4 | grep 4096
INTEGER & WRITING 4096 Kb block: 1947.66 MB/s
~ $ ramspeed -b2 -m4 | grep 4096
INTEGER & READING 4096 Kb block: 4899.40 MB/s

~ # hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 2254 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1127.91 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 382 MB in 3.01 seconds = 126.83 MB/sec
_________________
https://github.com/defer-

[mir3x]

Either your SSD is crap or u have something misconfigured

I have on magnetic Seagate:
([ 0.962611] ata1.00: ATA-8: ST2000VX000-9YW164, CV13, max UDMA/133
[ 0.962691] ata1.00: 3907029168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA
[ 0.963226] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 )

hdparm -tT /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 6958 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3480.83 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 504 MB in 3.01 seconds = 167.45 MB/sec
_________________
Sent from Windows

[defer-]

Well i have old computer and aggressive power saving settings. Anyways its the seek time thats the greatest benefit of ssd. Without SATA ALPM i got a bit better results:

[666threesixes666]

net-analyzer/namebench

must be built against python 2.7.... benchmarks DNS and improves net performance selecting fastest. shows shortest time, and shortest average time.