View previous topic :: View next topic |
What gentoo should do with udev |
Keep udev as-is |
|
29% |
[ 12 ] |
Make udev optional |
|
70% |
[ 29 ] |
|
Total Votes : 41 |
|
Author |
Message |
Kollin Veteran
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 1139 Location: Sofia/Bulgaria
|
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
steveL wrote: |
...
So bleating about how it was quite easy for a desktop user to change his eth0 to ensp5x20 (just rename the initscript and edit the firewall configuration) is completely pointless. Firstly, these changes don't do anything for the vast majority of desktop users, since they were fine with eth0 and wlan0 already; additionally that desktop user is liable to pain when s/he plugs a new device in, which is hardly "a robust solution for the modern era." Secondly it says nothing at all about the amount of work that would be required for a multi-NIC admin, who may well have many custom config files tied into their network setup. You know, that setup they were advised to use and did so in good faith.
Sure, we can work around that with scripts et al. But there has to be a damn good reason to go making wholesale changes across the board like that: it's a big ask, and requires an investment of resources in testing. It's not something admins worth the salt like doing: they prefer fire-and-forget for damn good reasons.
And a flaky design that is supposedly meant for desktop users but makes their life harder, while not doing anything at all for net admins, is not it.
.... |
Agree! _________________ "Dear Enemy: may the Lord hate you and all your kind, may you be turned orange in hue, and may your head fall off at an awkward moment."
"Linux is like a wigwam - no windows, no gates, apache inside..." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ulenrich Veteran
Joined: 10 Oct 2010 Posts: 1480
|
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kollin wrote: | steveL wrote: |
...
So bleating about how it was quite easy for a desktop user to change his eth0 to ensp5x20 (just rename the initscript and edit the firewall configuration) is completely pointless. Firstly, these changes don't do anything for the vast majority of desktop users, since they were fine with eth0 and wlan0 already;
|
Agree! |
Totally agree. But only with that shortened quote of steveL.
I upgraded to current~unstable and I have the old names without any scripts. Just followed the news. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anon-E-moose Watchman
Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6098 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
NeddySeagoon wrote: | The whole thing reminds me of this |
Pretty much _________________ PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, 6.1 zen kernel
gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|