Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Whoever improved ufed
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
drizzt
Guru
Guru


Joined: 21 Jul 2002
Posts: 333

PostPosted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 3:36 pm    Post subject: Whoever improved ufed Reply with quote

a big Thank You from me !

Great Job

:D
_________________
People don't have to earn my respect. I offer my respect to them, but be careful to lose my respect...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jaglover
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 4563
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana

PostPosted: Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I saw the upgrade ... after your post I fired it up ... oh my! Thank you from me, too!
_________________
Please learn how to denote units correctly!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yamakuzure
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 1238
Location: Bardowick, Germany

PostPosted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are welcome! But please note that it is an RC. Aaaaand there are more things to do to (someday) get to a real 1.0 version. ;)

If you'd like to help, please take a look at the list of open bugs, as I appreciate any and every feedback! :D
_________________
I *do* know that I easily aggravate people due to my condensed writing. Rule of thumb: If I wrote anything that can be understood in two different ways, and one way offends you, then I meant the other! ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
comprookie2000
Developer
Developer


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 892
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

+1
thanks Yamakuzure for taking care of our beloved ufed
_________________
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mv
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 3798

PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately, new ufed does not show all USE-flags anymore: It seems that all flags containing "_" are filtered.
I can imagine that this was intentional since in many cases "_" correspond to USE_EXPAND variables.
However, there are also many USE-flags with "_" which are not USE_EXPAND. Examples: SECURITY_HAZARD, 16k_voice, action_modeswitch, all_sfx, embed_data_files, pax_kernel, sse4_1, sse2_4way.
None of these flags shows up with current ufed...

Should I open a bug for this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yamakuzure
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 1238
Location: Bardowick, Germany

PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mv wrote:
Unfortunately, new ufed does not show all USE-flags anymore: It seems that all flags containing "_" are filtered.
I can imagine that this was intentional since in many cases "_" correspond to USE_EXPAND variables.
However, there are also many USE-flags with "_" which are not USE_EXPAND. Examples: SECURITY_HAZARD, 16k_voice, action_modeswitch, all_sfx, embed_data_files, pax_kernel, sse4_1, sse2_4way.
None of these flags shows up with current ufed...
That is bad, and I'll look into it.
mv wrote:
Should I open a bug for this?
Yes, of course. The person a bug is assigned to will be e-mailed the report then. Chances are high that a maintainer is never aware of such issues otherwise. ;)

However, I just took a look into ufed-0.90_rc1 and can see:
  • SECURITY_HAZARD (net-misc/iputils)
  • 16k_voice (app-accessibility/eflite)
  • action_modeswitch (sys-fs/udev)
  • all_sfx (app-arch/rar)
  • embed_data_files (app-text/pandoc, dev-haskell/citeproc-hs)
  • pax_kernel (multiple packages)
  • sse4_1 (media-libs/libvpx, sci-chemistry/gromacs) and
  • sse2_4way (net-misc/bfgmimer, net-misc/cgminer)
So if you can not see those flags but I can, we have two possibilities. A) You are doing something wrong (what on earth could *that* be?) or B) There is a bug that simply does not show up on my system.

In any case I tend to believe possibility B) to be by far more likely and it would really help if you opened a bug against that issue.
_________________
I *do* know that I easily aggravate people due to my condensed writing. Rule of thumb: If I wrote anything that can be understood in two different ways, and one way offends you, then I meant the other! ;)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mv
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 3798

PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks. Now that I know that the behaviour is indeed unintended, I analyzed the problem and found the cause. Bug opened.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum