| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16033 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 4:45 am Post subject: Richard Stallman's Solution To 'Too Big To Fail' |
|
|
Driving business away doesn't seem like the best solution, but it is a discussion worth having. But this last time around, banks were the problem, and since the banks are what keeps the economy undead, they'd be exempt.
And I guess if your goal was to create a super elite, you could have turned GM into a bunch of expensive boutique car manufacturers, then slapped a 90% tax on those who could afford to buy them. 'Cause that'd employ a lot of people.
Richard Stallman's Solution To 'Too Big To Fail' _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amaranatha n00b

Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 48 Location: Spain, Europe
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stallman should learn the meaning of "economy of scale". Then, he would start to understand how retarded his proposal is.
Too big to fail? Too big to bail! _________________ "Freedom incurs responsibility; that is why so many men fear it." - George Bernard Shaw |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ahenobarbi Developer


Joined: 02 Apr 2009 Posts: 336 Location: Warsaw, PL
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What a horrible idea. Not only it would hurt economy(punishing for income, redirecting more resources from productive activities to tax evasion) but it would encourage even more "too big to fail". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16033 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ahenobarbi wrote: | | it would encourage even more "too big to fail". | How would forcing corporations to be smaller cause more "too big to fail?" _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ahenobarbi Developer


Joined: 02 Apr 2009 Posts: 336 Location: Warsaw, PL
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | Ahenobarbi wrote: | | it would encourage even more "too big to fail". | How would forcing corporations to be smaller cause more "too big to fail?" |
With this in place they could present reasoning like "we pay taxes for being too big to fail, so we have right to be bailed". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16033 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL. I suppose that's possible, but taxes often don't benefit those who actually pay them, so there is long standing precedent for that to not happen. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|