| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MustrumR
n00b
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 35
Location: Right here
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ant P.
Veteran
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 1916
Location: UK
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Because most people only ever need a tiny fraction of those 40, and it's easier to get a list of what codecs are actually installed that way than reading USE descriptions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Advocate
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 4809
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ant P. wrote: | | Because most people only ever need a tiny fraction of those 40, and it's easier to get a list of what codecs are actually installed that way than reading USE descriptions. |
Well, the later part is arguable.
It was actually a decision of the main maintainer at the time - even some of the people in the herd had strongly disagreed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ant P.
Veteran
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 1916
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you got a source for that?
(Or if it's easier to answer: is it the same maintainer who decided to proactively rip out GTK+2 support from all apps that supported 2.x & 3.x, while gtk3 was still unusable?) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage
Advocate
Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 4809
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ant P. wrote: | Have you got a source for that?
(Or if it's easier to answer: is it the same maintainer who decided to proactively rip out GTK+2 support from all apps that supported 2.x & 3.x, while gtk3 was still unusable?) |
Actually, the person, whose reaction I refer to, was the very same one who was most active at moving the tree to gtk3 (and that wasn't a really bad move, just perhaps one Gnome release early).
As for the source, there's an old bug (IIRC a closed one) where he states he leaves gstreamer herd for that reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Multimedia
