| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rangers generally dress in green or brown.
EDIT: The castle nut wrench came in today, so I can fasten the collapsible stock onto the lower receiver, whenever those get here.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ichbinsisyphos Guru


Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 547
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ichbinsisyphos wrote: | | What's the point? | Can you explain what you are doing here or do you not really know yourself?
You can not legally own the AR-15 in California, but this lower receiver bought separately is somehow not regulated? Because it is manufactured by a different company or what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bogamol Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 84 Location: Detroit, Michigan - The Home of Rock and Roll
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
++
Edit this was aimed ay BKs previous post which was here a minute ago. He must not have been sure about the reception he would recieve for saying what he said. Don't worry man, ol' bogamol has got your back.
Last edited by bogamol on Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:45 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1480 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently it's legal if it's not a certain brand, and if you don't make it look like an assault rifle (e.g., no folding stock, no pistol grip, no flash suppressor). wswartzendruber indicates he is getting a folding stock though.
The laws are confusing. I think maybe wswartzendruber should consult an attorney, before he assembles this weapon and takes it out in public.
That's the nice thing about shotguns. They're legal just about anywhere, if you don't get all 'tactical' with it. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I still say you should've got airsoft guns. _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1480 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Harrot v. County of Kings (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1138 (PDF, 93K) was a California Supreme Court case that held essentially that a semiautomatic centerfire rifle could not be considered an Assault Weapon unless and until it had been specifically identified in section 30510 (old 12276) of the Penal Code, the California Code of Regulations, or the so called Kasler list as promulgated by the California Attorney General (current combined list). Further the rifle had to be identified by the Attorney General by both make and model. Harrot judicially moots the "series" language in Penal Code 12276 (a)(1), 12276 (a)(5), and 12276 (e). In 2006 the Attorney General lobbied for and helped pass AB-2728 to give up the ability to add firearms to the list of named Assault Weapons. In January of 2007, AB 2728 took effect. AB-2728 foreclosed the chance that the Attorney General would be required to open a new registration window. |
However comma...
| Quote: | | California also regulates semiautomatic rifles by features in Penal Code 30515 (old 12276.1) Generally, the Penal Code prohibits a semiautomatic rifle from having a detachable magazine and any one of a pistol grip, folding or telescoping stock, flash hider, forward pistol grip, or grenade launcher. |
_________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1480 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bogamol wrote: | ++
Edit this was aimed ay BKs previous post which was here a minute ago. He must not have been sure about the reception he would recieve for saying what he said. Don't worry man, ol' bogamol has got your back. |
No, I was looking up some additional information. Apparently they pretty much quashed the California law against "assault weapons", but they have another law against semiautomatic rifles having pistol grips, folding stocks, etc. That is just plain stupid.
Regulating automatic fire, weapon caliber, etc., makes sense. This doesn't. They are basically regulating what a rifle can look like. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bogamol Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 84 Location: Detroit, Michigan - The Home of Rock and Roll
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
++
especially calibre. Any thing that is only capable of firing a little plastic bb should be illegal on the grounds that you'll shoot your eye out, kid.
Personally i think it should be legal to own a 80mm howitzer for example, but I dont think its unreasonable to say that the rounds can only be sold at licensed ranges for use at that range...Reloads should be illegal citing safety of firing a compromised case out of an artillery piece...otherwise people ought to able to have the shell casing when done firing it.
What about autofire though? Do you consider a bumper stock to be full auto...because on an AR you can use the recoil of the weapon to unpull the trigger and simulate rapid fire in a semi automatic weapon even without the bumperstock.
I guess now that I think about it --
Regulating autofire doesnt work because you can still rapid fire without it. And while I agree with regulating the ammo in some calibers I think even the biggest weapons with the most ridiculous calibers ought to be ownable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1480 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, I see. I thought you couldn't have any of the above. If that's the case, I'd give up the pistol grip for a detachable magazine. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| An AR without a pistol grip looks gay. The bullet button does not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1480 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wswartzendruber wrote: | | An AR without a pistol grip looks gay. The bullet button does not. |
Who cares what it looks like? The point is how effective it is. Most rifle stocks (except lever-action) have the functional equivalent of a pistol grip already built in (or close enough). A sustained rate of fire depends on reload time, and being able to quickly drop a magazine and insert a new one is a big difference. "It looks 'gay'" is not a factor in determining whether your position got over-run or not.
I don't know how the law works, as far as "it's not an assault weapon unless it has X of the following" (I thought if it had any it was illegal), but here are those "assault weapon" features in order of priority, as I see it:
1. detachable magazine
2. flash suppressor
3. pistol grip
4. collapsable stock
However, I do understand that you are trying to create the facsimile of an AR-15, and for you, it's appearance is important. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sikpuppy n00b


Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 23 Location: Central Coast, NSW
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wswartzendruber wrote: | | An AR without a pistol grip looks gay. The bullet button does not. |
Don't ask, don't tell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This came in the mail yesterday: Upper Receiver |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What will you shoot with that? _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Image moved. Hopefully it isn't the puppy. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sikpuppy n00b


Joined: 12 Jun 2012 Posts: 23 Location: Central Coast, NSW
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | Image moved. Hopefully it isn't the puppy. |
It's there now. It appears to be an actual calibration target. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, good. I was concerned it might actually be something else. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1480 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you have javascript disabled, it erroneously says the picture has been deleted or moved. If you toggle it on, it erroneously then loads the first picture in the series, which is a sleeping puppy, not the target.
That's a police M-16 zeroing target array. They are used at close range. Unless the shooter is a very experienced marksman zeroing before combat, hunting, etc., zeroing should be done the first time with the weapon in a bench rest or (then the shooter can operate under the assumption that any inaccuracy is something they must correct in their technique). If you don't have access to one, just use sandbags until you can get access to one. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The USMC has everyone zero their own weapons in the standing, kneeling, sitting and prone positions. So that's four different zeros you have. You write the data (elevation, windage) on a piece of paper and store it in the stock. Their rationale is that everyone's zero is going to be different because each person has a different posture in each position. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
What's wrong with a simple bolt-action rifle? A Remington or something.
More powerful.
More accurate.
Beautiful. _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wswartzendruber Veteran


Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Posts: 1196 Location: Jefferson, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm also thinking of a Remington M24. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
notageek Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 78 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A Remington 770 or 700. These are not very expensive. _________________ What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysideways Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 145
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|