Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Obama's tax rate was 20.5%; lower than his secretary's
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
juniper
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 756
Location: EU

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Earth wrote:
He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House.


you usually don't sound like a nut...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

juniper wrote:
The Earth wrote:
He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House.


you usually don't sound like a nut...


Sometimes truth seems nutty.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

juniper wrote:
aidanjt wrote:
A tax on tax-derived income. Makes sense. Or, they could just proportionally reduce their salaries.

Then again, I'm sure some moron will go OMFGOBAMADOESNTPAY*ANY*TAX!!!!111111111!!!!!!! So scrap that..


if republicans would stop blocking the raising of taxes on the wealthy, this wouldn't happen.

Not sure how this makes him hypocritical, but there you go :roll: his tax rate is set and he is paying it. he is the one saying it should change.

He's hypocritical because he's one of the people who is, as he puts it, "not paying his fair share". There's nothing stopping him from paying more, or turning down his salary, or donating his book sales to Obamacare, etc.

Also, Republicans are not blocking the raising of taxes on the wealthy. They are blocking the raising of taxes, period (without good faith efforts being to also reduce spending). They just made some kind of a statement the other day that they are not opposed to a tax increase on top earners.

You are a propganda victim. The barrier to progress is as much that Democrats refuse to reduce their profligate spending as it is that Republicans refuse to raise taxes, and the idea that they are specifically opposed to raising taxes on the wealthy is Democrat propaganda along the same lines as saying that they have a "war on women" -- it's populist demagoguery, and if you buy into it, that makes you one of the Proles and part of the mindless lemming herd.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
energyman76b
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 2022
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Earth wrote:
richk449 wrote:
The Earth wrote:
notageek wrote:
Oblaba.

OTW, the fantasy world that it is, is a medium for Republicans to blow steam when they know very well they can't beat him this year.


:lol:

It's so obvious that you don't live in the USA. I'm in the bluest of the blue states, and people are pissed at Obama here.

He didn't say that people wern't pissed at Obama. He said that the republicans can't beat Obama this year.


Romney's not unlikable. They can't paint him as a "right wing extremist", and they just shot themselves in the foot attacking his cancer surviving, MS suffering wife. He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House.


the same Romney that pays less taxes than Obama?
_________________
AidanJT wrote:

Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.

Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

energyman76b wrote:
The Earth wrote:
richk449 wrote:
The Earth wrote:
notageek wrote:
Oblaba.

OTW, the fantasy world that it is, is a medium for Republicans to blow steam when they know very well they can't beat him this year.


:lol:

It's so obvious that you don't live in the USA. I'm in the bluest of the blue states, and people are pissed at Obama here.

He didn't say that people wern't pissed at Obama. He said that the republicans can't beat Obama this year.


Romney's not unlikable. They can't paint him as a "right wing extremist", and they just shot themselves in the foot attacking his cancer surviving, MS suffering wife. He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House.


the same Romney that pays less taxes than Obama?

Yes. The same Romney, but he does not run around screaming that the rich are not paying their "fair share", so your point is?
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

energyman76b wrote:
the same Romney that pays less taxes than Obama?


He pays more taxes than Obama, a lot more. He just pays a lower percentage.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And Romney's money doesn't come from political corruption, like writing books used to launder campaign money into his personal accounts by having his campaign purchase hundreds of thousands of his books and send them to every public library, school, museum, and major campaign finance contributor, and selling vast quantities of them to un-named purchasers (probably connected with outfits like Solyndra) who probably then just incinerate them.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aidanjt
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1101
Location: Rep. of Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
And Romney's money doesn't come from political corruption,

OH YEAH ROMNEY IS A RIGHT WINGER, THEY'RE ALL WHITER THAN WHITE AND CORRUPTION FREE!!
_________________
juniper wrote:
you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidanjt wrote:
BoneKracker wrote:
And Romney's money doesn't come from political corruption,

OH YEAH ROMNEY IS A RIGHT WINGER, THEY'RE ALL WHITER THAN WHITE AND CORRUPTION FREE!!


Just sad.

The State Department has bought numerous copies of Obama's books. Libraries across the country are stocked with them, the DNC bought copies to distribute as "gifts"... try looking up what crony capitalism is. You might just see a smiling image of choco-jesus himself.

And the next you want to play the race card, get one first.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aidanjt
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1101
Location: Rep. of Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Earth wrote:
The State Department has bought numerous copies of Obama's books. Libraries across the country are stocked with them, the DNC bought copies to distribute as "gifts"... try looking up what crony capitalism is. You might just see a smiling image of choco-jesus himself.

What's 'numerous copies'? 2 can be 'numerous'. If there's legitimate corruption going on then let it be prosecuted. Else, it's all a load of hateful hot air.

The Earth wrote:
And the next you want to play the race card, get one first.

Actually I didn't. But if the right weren't constantly racist, the race card wouldn't need to be played.
_________________
juniper wrote:
you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidanjt wrote:
But if the right weren't constantly racist, the race card wouldn't need to be played.


The day your adult epiphany happens will be quite amazing.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aidanjt
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1101
Location: Rep. of Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Earth wrote:
The day your adult epiphany happens will be quite amazing.

Really? :roll: :roll: :roll:

Capricious name calling is beneath your age group. It makes it all the worse when you do that by calling someone childish.
_________________
juniper wrote:
you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny, considering your race comment.
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aidanjt
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1101
Location: Rep. of Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
Funny, considering your race comment.

Being racist is an act. When someone or some group is being racist it's perfectly valid to call them on that act. If you disagree with the act being racist, then address that point. Don't attack the person.

Also, LOLUDIDITFIRST!!? :roll:

No, I didn't make a race comment. "Whiter than white" is an idiom for purity/cleanliness/without sin/etc. It isn't a race reference unless you're a knee-jerk defender of racism.
_________________
juniper wrote:
you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjp
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002
Posts: 16029
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"But if the right weren't constantly racist"
_________________
lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.

In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aidanjt
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 1101
Location: Rep. of Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pjp wrote:
"But if the right weren't constantly racist"

In response to
The Earth wrote:
And the next you want to play the race card, get one first.

_________________
juniper wrote:
you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zixnub
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 64
Location: Brasschaat, Belgium

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Obama is stimulating the economy by investing the money and creating new jobs in what otherwise would go to taxes.
_________________
http://trinity.netcat.be
http://code.google.com/p/ewm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
juniper
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 756
Location: EU

PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:

He's hypocritical because he's one of the people who is, as he puts it, "not paying his fair share". There's nothing stopping him from paying more, or turning down his salary, or donating his book sales to Obamacare, etc.


that doesn't solve the problem that "the rich don't pay their fair share". I am not endorsing that is the right thing to do. he never claimed that "obama doesn't pay his fair share", which is the only wrong that would be corrected had he done what you suggest.

so, it isn't hypocritical in the least.

Quote:

Also, Republicans are not blocking the raising of taxes on the wealthy. They are blocking the raising of taxes, period (without good faith efforts being to also reduce spending). They just made some kind of a statement the other day that they are not opposed to a tax increase on top earners.


ok. then shouldn't it be possible to get that through?

Quote:

You are a propganda victim. The barrier to progress is as much that Democrats refuse to reduce their profligate spending as it is that Republicans refuse to raise taxes, and the idea that they are specifically opposed to raising taxes on the wealthy is Democrat propaganda along the same lines as saying that they have a "war on women" -- it's populist demagoguery, and if you buy into it, that makes you one of the Proles and part of the mindless lemming herd.


no, I am not a propaganda victim. your fiscal problems are both parties fault for spending too much and being shit with money. I am merely addressing that this thread is bullshit because it doesn't make obama a hypocrite. I was only responding to this claim of yours.

BK wrote:

I don't know, but there's no way for Obama not to look hypocritical.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It obviously does make Obama hypocritical. He is calling for the top 1% to pay more taxes (because they are allegedly not paying their "fair share"), and yet he himself pays only a 20% tax rate (by choice, had he not claimed various deductions, he'd have paid 35% or 40%). There is no way you can say that is not hypocritical.

Tax increases on the top 1% probably will get through, as soon as Democrats are willing to also make some corresponding spending cuts. You're acknowledging now that it's a problem on both sides, but you weren't earlier.

In fact, there was a deal at one point, based on a quid pro quo of proportional spending reductions and tax increases, but Obama backed out, preferring instead to play chicken with fiscal default, while claiming that it was the fault of Republicans. What he did amounts to, "let me have all the deficit spending I want, or I'll drive the car off a cliff." And the whole time, he claimed it was Republicans who were "holding the country hostage". The fact that you apparently believe that shit is what makes you a propaganda victim.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aidanjt wrote:
No, I didn't make a race comment. "Whiter than white" is an idiom for purity/cleanliness/without sin/etc.


Ok, if you actually weren't using racist language against Romney by saying that he's "white than white", then I apologize for being a racer.
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

zixnub wrote:
Obama is stimulating the economy by investing the money and creating new jobs in what otherwise would go to taxes.

:lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
juniper
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 756
Location: EU

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
It obviously does make Obama hypocritical. He is calling for the top 1% to pay more taxes (because they are allegedly not paying their "fair share"), and yet he himself pays only a 20% tax rate (by choice, had he not claimed various deductions, he'd have paid 35% or 40%). There is no way you can say that is not hypocritical.


are we going through this again?

"obama isn't paying enough taxes" <----- is NOT his (or Buffet's) claim, even though you seem to think it is. This is the problem that would be solved by your proposed solution (although, not even).

"the rich aren't paying enough taxes" <------ is his claim

Now, how should he solve the problem? Is the problem solved by him paying more taxes than he should? No. Is the problem solved by raising taxes on the rich? yes.

There is absolutely nothing hypocritical about paying the minimum taxes you can and advocate that people in your tax bracket should have their rate raised. That is like saying that president X is hypocritical for saying gas prices should be raised even though he is only paying the rate at the pump. that wouldn't do any good, would it?

One is a policy claim, the other is bullshit. There are some ordinarily intelligent people here who made the same ridiculous claim about Buffet, and it was silly for the same reason.

take the blinder off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You take the blinders off. He's obviously being hypocritical. He's not leading by example. If he honestly believe the 1% aren't paying enough taxes, why doesn't he start with his own taxes? He is one of the 1%. He (or Biden) said it is the "patriotic duty" of the rich to pay higher taxes.

Don't waste your time on more strawmen and rambling. If he were arguing for a ban on smoking and was out there puffing away, you'd probably say "Obama quitting doesn't solve the problem", right? Please. :roll:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
juniper
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 756
Location: EU

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
You take the blinders off. He's obviously being hypocritical. He's not leading by example. If he honestly believe the 1% aren't paying enough taxes, why doesn't he start with his own taxes? He is one of the 1%. He (or Biden) said it is the "patriotic duty" of the rich to pay higher taxes.


He isn't supposed to lead by example. He is supposed to set policy, and policy isn't set by example. I've stated why he shouldn't start with his own taxes. That isn't the problem, and he isn't claiming it is.

Some googling suggests that Biden said what you said, which is a silly thing to say. In any case, if you can't see the difference, I can't explain it any better than I have.

Quote:

Don't waste your time on more strawmen and rambling. If he were arguing for a ban on smoking and was out there puffing away, you'd probably say "Obama quitting doesn't solve the problem", right? Please. :roll:


Strawman? laughable. where? you are the one who seems to think the problem is that obama is paying too much taxes (or you think he thinks this) and have set up a scenario whereby he is contradicting himself. Strawman if I ever saw one.

Yes, I would in fact say that if Obama was arguing for a smoking ban and he is puffing away, there is nothing hypocritical about it. If he said that everyone should quit smoking and he was puffing away, THEN that it is hypocritical. And yes obama quitting smoking doesn't achieve the goal that would be achieved by a ban in smoking.

You see, one is a statement about policy (banning smoking), and one is statement about what one ought to do (quit smoking). They are different.

If obama paid more taxes the outcome would be different than raising taxes on the rich. Most people would still do what they ought to do; pay the least amount of taxes they could. Nothing done, nothing achieved. He could point to himself as an example until he was blue in the face, but not much would come of it in terms of tax revenue (unless some insane miracle occurred).

It's a simple concept. I can't explain any better than I already have, so I am done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1488
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobody is asking you to explain (to mumble confused, illogical nonsense) any further. You're wrong.

Either the principle is right or it's not. The smoking analogy is perfectly fair:

If the President wants people to quit smoking, and he's saying people should quit smoking, and he's calling for legislation to force people to quit smoking, and yet he's flagrantly smoking himself, then he's a hypocrite. (By the way, why do you think the President quit smoking?)

Similarly, if the President wants the 1% to pay higher taxes, and he's saying they should pay higher taxes, and he's calling for legislation to force them to pay higher taxes, yet he's flagrantly paying a low tax rate himself, then he's a hypocrite.

He's a fucking hypocrite. End of story.
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum