| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
juniper l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 756 Location: EU
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Earth wrote: | | He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House. |
you usually don't sound like a nut... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muso l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 655 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| juniper wrote: | | The Earth wrote: | | He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House. |
you usually don't sound like a nut... |
Sometimes truth seems nutty. _________________ If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| juniper wrote: | | aidanjt wrote: | A tax on tax-derived income. Makes sense. Or, they could just proportionally reduce their salaries.
Then again, I'm sure some moron will go OMFGOBAMADOESNTPAY*ANY*TAX!!!!111111111!!!!!!! So scrap that.. |
if republicans would stop blocking the raising of taxes on the wealthy, this wouldn't happen.
Not sure how this makes him hypocritical, but there you go his tax rate is set and he is paying it. he is the one saying it should change. |
He's hypocritical because he's one of the people who is, as he puts it, "not paying his fair share". There's nothing stopping him from paying more, or turning down his salary, or donating his book sales to Obamacare, etc.
Also, Republicans are not blocking the raising of taxes on the wealthy. They are blocking the raising of taxes, period (without good faith efforts being to also reduce spending). They just made some kind of a statement the other day that they are not opposed to a tax increase on top earners.
You are a propganda victim. The barrier to progress is as much that Democrats refuse to reduce their profligate spending as it is that Republicans refuse to raise taxes, and the idea that they are specifically opposed to raising taxes on the wealthy is Democrat propaganda along the same lines as saying that they have a "war on women" -- it's populist demagoguery, and if you buy into it, that makes you one of the Proles and part of the mindless lemming herd. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
energyman76b Advocate


Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 2022 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Earth wrote: | | richk449 wrote: | | The Earth wrote: | | notageek wrote: | Oblaba.
OTW, the fantasy world that it is, is a medium for Republicans to blow steam when they know very well they can't beat him this year. |
It's so obvious that you don't live in the USA. I'm in the bluest of the blue states, and people are pissed at Obama here. |
He didn't say that people wern't pissed at Obama. He said that the republicans can't beat Obama this year. |
Romney's not unlikable. They can't paint him as a "right wing extremist", and they just shot themselves in the foot attacking his cancer surviving, MS suffering wife. He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House. |
the same Romney that pays less taxes than Obama? _________________
| AidanJT wrote: |
Libertardian denial of reality is wholly unimpressive and unconvincing, and simply serves to demonstrate what a bunch of delusional fools they all are.
|
Satan's got perfectly toned abs and rocks a c-cup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| energyman76b wrote: | | The Earth wrote: | | richk449 wrote: | | The Earth wrote: | | notageek wrote: | Oblaba.
OTW, the fantasy world that it is, is a medium for Republicans to blow steam when they know very well they can't beat him this year. |
It's so obvious that you don't live in the USA. I'm in the bluest of the blue states, and people are pissed at Obama here. |
He didn't say that people wern't pissed at Obama. He said that the republicans can't beat Obama this year. |
Romney's not unlikable. They can't paint him as a "right wing extremist", and they just shot themselves in the foot attacking his cancer surviving, MS suffering wife. He's more appealing to America as a whole than the radical hero of the black panthers that is currently squatting in the White House. |
the same Romney that pays less taxes than Obama? |
Yes. The same Romney, but he does not run around screaming that the rich are not paying their "fair share", so your point is? _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muso l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 655 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| energyman76b wrote: | | the same Romney that pays less taxes than Obama? |
He pays more taxes than Obama, a lot more. He just pays a lower percentage. _________________ If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
And Romney's money doesn't come from political corruption, like writing books used to launder campaign money into his personal accounts by having his campaign purchase hundreds of thousands of his books and send them to every public library, school, museum, and major campaign finance contributor, and selling vast quantities of them to un-named purchasers (probably connected with outfits like Solyndra) who probably then just incinerate them. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | And Romney's money doesn't come from political corruption, |
OH YEAH ROMNEY IS A RIGHT WINGER, THEY'RE ALL WHITER THAN WHITE AND CORRUPTION FREE!! _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muso l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 655 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aidanjt wrote: | | BoneKracker wrote: | | And Romney's money doesn't come from political corruption, |
OH YEAH ROMNEY IS A RIGHT WINGER, THEY'RE ALL WHITER THAN WHITE AND CORRUPTION FREE!! |
Just sad.
The State Department has bought numerous copies of Obama's books. Libraries across the country are stocked with them, the DNC bought copies to distribute as "gifts"... try looking up what crony capitalism is. You might just see a smiling image of choco-jesus himself.
And the next you want to play the race card, get one first. _________________ If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Earth wrote: | | The State Department has bought numerous copies of Obama's books. Libraries across the country are stocked with them, the DNC bought copies to distribute as "gifts"... try looking up what crony capitalism is. You might just see a smiling image of choco-jesus himself. |
What's 'numerous copies'? 2 can be 'numerous'. If there's legitimate corruption going on then let it be prosecuted. Else, it's all a load of hateful hot air.
| The Earth wrote: | | And the next you want to play the race card, get one first. |
Actually I didn't. But if the right weren't constantly racist, the race card wouldn't need to be played. _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muso l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 655 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aidanjt wrote: | | But if the right weren't constantly racist, the race card wouldn't need to be played. |
The day your adult epiphany happens will be quite amazing. _________________ If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Earth wrote: | | The day your adult epiphany happens will be quite amazing. |
Really?
Capricious name calling is beneath your age group. It makes it all the worse when you do that by calling someone childish. _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Funny, considering your race comment. _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | Funny, considering your race comment. |
Being racist is an act. When someone or some group is being racist it's perfectly valid to call them on that act. If you disagree with the act being racist, then address that point. Don't attack the person.
Also, LOLUDIDITFIRST!!?
No, I didn't make a race comment. "Whiter than white" is an idiom for purity/cleanliness/without sin/etc. It isn't a race reference unless you're a knee-jerk defender of racism. _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjp Administrator


Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 16029 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"But if the right weren't constantly racist" _________________ lolgov. 'cause where we're going, you don't have civil liberties.
In Loving Memory
1787 - 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pjp wrote: | | "But if the right weren't constantly racist" |
In response to | The Earth wrote: | | And the next you want to play the race card, get one first. |
_________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zixnub n00b


Joined: 27 Dec 2007 Posts: 64 Location: Brasschaat, Belgium
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
juniper l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 756 Location: EU
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: |
He's hypocritical because he's one of the people who is, as he puts it, "not paying his fair share". There's nothing stopping him from paying more, or turning down his salary, or donating his book sales to Obamacare, etc. |
that doesn't solve the problem that "the rich don't pay their fair share". I am not endorsing that is the right thing to do. he never claimed that "obama doesn't pay his fair share", which is the only wrong that would be corrected had he done what you suggest.
so, it isn't hypocritical in the least.
| Quote: |
Also, Republicans are not blocking the raising of taxes on the wealthy. They are blocking the raising of taxes, period (without good faith efforts being to also reduce spending). They just made some kind of a statement the other day that they are not opposed to a tax increase on top earners. |
ok. then shouldn't it be possible to get that through?
| Quote: |
You are a propganda victim. The barrier to progress is as much that Democrats refuse to reduce their profligate spending as it is that Republicans refuse to raise taxes, and the idea that they are specifically opposed to raising taxes on the wealthy is Democrat propaganda along the same lines as saying that they have a "war on women" -- it's populist demagoguery, and if you buy into it, that makes you one of the Proles and part of the mindless lemming herd. |
no, I am not a propaganda victim. your fiscal problems are both parties fault for spending too much and being shit with money. I am merely addressing that this thread is bullshit because it doesn't make obama a hypocrite. I was only responding to this claim of yours.
| BK wrote: |
I don't know, but there's no way for Obama not to look hypocritical. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
It obviously does make Obama hypocritical. He is calling for the top 1% to pay more taxes (because they are allegedly not paying their "fair share"), and yet he himself pays only a 20% tax rate (by choice, had he not claimed various deductions, he'd have paid 35% or 40%). There is no way you can say that is not hypocritical.
Tax increases on the top 1% probably will get through, as soon as Democrats are willing to also make some corresponding spending cuts. You're acknowledging now that it's a problem on both sides, but you weren't earlier.
In fact, there was a deal at one point, based on a quid pro quo of proportional spending reductions and tax increases, but Obama backed out, preferring instead to play chicken with fiscal default, while claiming that it was the fault of Republicans. What he did amounts to, "let me have all the deficit spending I want, or I'll drive the car off a cliff." And the whole time, he claimed it was Republicans who were "holding the country hostage". The fact that you apparently believe that shit is what makes you a propaganda victim. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Muso l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002 Posts: 655 Location: The Holy city of Honolulu
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| aidanjt wrote: | | No, I didn't make a race comment. "Whiter than white" is an idiom for purity/cleanliness/without sin/etc. |
Ok, if you actually weren't using racist language against Romney by saying that he's "white than white", then I apologize for being a racer. _________________ If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| zixnub wrote: | | Obama is stimulating the economy by investing the money and creating new jobs in what otherwise would go to taxes. |
 _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
juniper l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 756 Location: EU
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | It obviously does make Obama hypocritical. He is calling for the top 1% to pay more taxes (because they are allegedly not paying their "fair share"), and yet he himself pays only a 20% tax rate (by choice, had he not claimed various deductions, he'd have paid 35% or 40%). There is no way you can say that is not hypocritical. |
are we going through this again?
"obama isn't paying enough taxes" <----- is NOT his (or Buffet's) claim, even though you seem to think it is. This is the problem that would be solved by your proposed solution (although, not even).
"the rich aren't paying enough taxes" <------ is his claim
Now, how should he solve the problem? Is the problem solved by him paying more taxes than he should? No. Is the problem solved by raising taxes on the rich? yes.
There is absolutely nothing hypocritical about paying the minimum taxes you can and advocate that people in your tax bracket should have their rate raised. That is like saying that president X is hypocritical for saying gas prices should be raised even though he is only paying the rate at the pump. that wouldn't do any good, would it?
One is a policy claim, the other is bullshit. There are some ordinarily intelligent people here who made the same ridiculous claim about Buffet, and it was silly for the same reason.
take the blinder off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
You take the blinders off. He's obviously being hypocritical. He's not leading by example. If he honestly believe the 1% aren't paying enough taxes, why doesn't he start with his own taxes? He is one of the 1%. He (or Biden) said it is the "patriotic duty" of the rich to pay higher taxes.
Don't waste your time on more strawmen and rambling. If he were arguing for a ban on smoking and was out there puffing away, you'd probably say "Obama quitting doesn't solve the problem", right? Please.  _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
juniper l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 756 Location: EU
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoneKracker wrote: | | You take the blinders off. He's obviously being hypocritical. He's not leading by example. If he honestly believe the 1% aren't paying enough taxes, why doesn't he start with his own taxes? He is one of the 1%. He (or Biden) said it is the "patriotic duty" of the rich to pay higher taxes. |
He isn't supposed to lead by example. He is supposed to set policy, and policy isn't set by example. I've stated why he shouldn't start with his own taxes. That isn't the problem, and he isn't claiming it is.
Some googling suggests that Biden said what you said, which is a silly thing to say. In any case, if you can't see the difference, I can't explain it any better than I have.
| Quote: |
Don't waste your time on more strawmen and rambling. If he were arguing for a ban on smoking and was out there puffing away, you'd probably say "Obama quitting doesn't solve the problem", right? Please.  |
Strawman? laughable. where? you are the one who seems to think the problem is that obama is paying too much taxes (or you think he thinks this) and have set up a scenario whereby he is contradicting himself. Strawman if I ever saw one.
Yes, I would in fact say that if Obama was arguing for a smoking ban and he is puffing away, there is nothing hypocritical about it. If he said that everyone should quit smoking and he was puffing away, THEN that it is hypocritical. And yes obama quitting smoking doesn't achieve the goal that would be achieved by a ban in smoking.
You see, one is a statement about policy (banning smoking), and one is statement about what one ought to do (quit smoking). They are different.
If obama paid more taxes the outcome would be different than raising taxes on the rich. Most people would still do what they ought to do; pay the least amount of taxes they could. Nothing done, nothing achieved. He could point to himself as an example until he was blue in the face, but not much would come of it in terms of tax revenue (unless some insane miracle occurred).
It's a simple concept. I can't explain any better than I already have, so I am done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoneKracker Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 1488 Location: U.S.A.
|
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nobody is asking you to explain (to mumble confused, illogical nonsense) any further. You're wrong.
Either the principle is right or it's not. The smoking analogy is perfectly fair:
If the President wants people to quit smoking, and he's saying people should quit smoking, and he's calling for legislation to force people to quit smoking, and yet he's flagrantly smoking himself, then he's a hypocrite. (By the way, why do you think the President quit smoking?)
Similarly, if the President wants the 1% to pay higher taxes, and he's saying they should pay higher taxes, and he's calling for legislation to force them to pay higher taxes, yet he's flagrantly paying a low tax rate himself, then he's a hypocrite.
He's a fucking hypocrite. End of story. _________________ Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|