View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
VoidMage Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 6196
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:28 pm Post subject: adobe-flash 11.2.202.228 not working at all |
|
|
As opposed to more common problems with colors, for me this version of flash is not working at all, both in firefox and in opera.
Both browsers act as if the plugin was present (as they don't display messages that it's missing), yet none of the flash content gets displayed.
I've got little hope for a fix, but does anyone else have similar problem ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gusar Advocate
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 2665 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've seen a mention of that elsewhere, but not a solution. So good news, you're not alone. Bad news, you're probably screwed anyway
One maybe good thing is that Adobe released a new 10.3 version that fixes some recent vulnerability. You can get it here: http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html. The problem is that future vulnerabilities will probably only be fixed in 11.2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albright Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 2588 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
somewhat off topic but when I go to
http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
the page reports I have
Code: | You have version
11,1,102,55 installed |
even though portage reports I do have 11.2.202.228
So that's curious _________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerard27 Advocate
Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 2377 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not here albright.
It senses my version correctly as 11.2.202.228.
Gerard. _________________ To install Gentoo I use sysrescuecd.Based on Gentoo,has firefox to browse Gentoo docs and mc to browse (and edit) files.
The same disk can be used for 32 and 64 bit installs.
You can follow the Handbook verbatim.
http://www.sysresccd.org/Download |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albright Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 2588 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uninstall, reboot, re-install
now I actually have 11.2.202.228
very strange, but flash works for me
Edit: but now I've got the boosted blue effect
(which can be corrected by disabling hardware accel.) _________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerard27 Advocate
Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 2377 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome to the club.
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-918540-highlight-.html
I tried to d/l the patch but FF said I had an addon missing.
So I ended up unmerging libvdpau now it plays normal colors.
Gerard. _________________ To install Gentoo I use sysrescuecd.Based on Gentoo,has firefox to browse Gentoo docs and mc to browse (and edit) files.
The same disk can be used for 32 and 64 bit installs.
You can follow the Handbook verbatim.
http://www.sysresccd.org/Download |
|
Back to top |
|
|
albright Advocate
Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 2588 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | So I ended up unmerging libvdpau now it plays normal colors. |
yes, but
Code: | $ equery depends libvdpau
* These packages depend on libvdpau:
media-libs/xine-lib-1.2.1 (vdpau ? x11-libs/libvdpau)
media-video/ffmpeg-0.10.2 (vdpau ? x11-libs/libvdpau)
media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc4_p20110322-r1 (vdpau ? x11-libs/libvdpau)
www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 (vdpau ? x11-libs/libvdpau)
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-295.20-r1 (>=x11-libs/libvdpau-0.3-r1)
|
_________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerard27 Advocate
Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 2377 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know but I'll see what will be done in the coming weeks.
I don't watch movies anyway.
I sometimes get a flash movie in the mail,that's all.
Gerard. _________________ To install Gentoo I use sysrescuecd.Based on Gentoo,has firefox to browse Gentoo docs and mc to browse (and edit) files.
The same disk can be used for 32 and 64 bit installs.
You can follow the Handbook verbatim.
http://www.sysresccd.org/Download |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anon-E-moose Watchman
Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6103 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*Deleted because it seemed to affect others delicate sensibilities* _________________ PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, 6.1 zen kernel
gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland
Last edited by Anon-E-moose on Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:58 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerard27 Advocate
Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 2377 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried that too Anon-E-moose.
Still blue people.
In my xorg.log it says Code: | 15957.399] (II) Loading sub module "dri2"
[ 15957.399] (II) LoadModule: "dri2"
[ 15957.400] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libdri2.so
[ 15957.400] (II) Module dri2: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 15957.400] compiled for 1.11.2, module version = 1.2.0
[ 15957.400] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0
[ 15957.400] (II) NVIDIA(0): [DRI2] Setup complete
[ 15957.400] (II) NVIDIA(0): [DRI2] VDPAU driver: nvidia |
Revdep-rebuild turns up nothing!
So maybe we can do without? Code: |
ikke@Gerard ~ $ equery b libdri2.so
* Searching for libdri2.so ...
x11-base/xorg-server-1.11.2-r2 (/usr/lib64/opengl/xorg-x11/extensions/libdri2.so)
ikke@Gerard ~ $ |
Gerard.
Edit: The vdpau USE flag is a local flag. _________________ To install Gentoo I use sysrescuecd.Based on Gentoo,has firefox to browse Gentoo docs and mc to browse (and edit) files.
The same disk can be used for 32 and 64 bit installs.
You can follow the Handbook verbatim.
http://www.sysresccd.org/Download |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 6196
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, the thread got successfully derailed.
@Gusar: do you recall where did you see it ? I want to make sure that it's not something specific to my hardware. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gusar Advocate
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 2665 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VoidMage wrote: | @Gusar: do you recall where did you see it ? I want to make sure that it's not something specific to my hardware. |
Here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=138534
And surprise, surprise, that thread also got derailed |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anon-E-moose Watchman
Joined: 23 May 2008 Posts: 6103 Location: Dallas area
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*Deleted because it seemed to affect others delicate sensibilities* _________________ PRIME x570-pro, 3700x, 6.1 zen kernel
gcc 13, profile 17.0 (custom bare multilib), openrc, wayland
Last edited by Anon-E-moose on Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:59 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gusar Advocate
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 2665 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anon-E-moose wrote: | Now, if we were to look at version of libvdpau, version of firefox/whatever browser/etc then maybe we could find out what's going on. |
What's going on is very well known, as is a workaround. There is a thread about it already - https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-918540-highlight-.html
This thread is about a different issue though, but it can't be discussed if people continue on about the blue people. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 6196
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
This might be related, though it's hard to say - the report lacks details.
...well, not that my post has many; on the other hand, I really can't tell what details I could acquire, after all neither dmesg, nor full log show any crashes.
Also, some of the posts I came across suggest it's a CPU problem - this hardware is quite a bit dated, so it might be that Adobe built this release with optimizations, that result in SIGILL (shouldn't that show up in the logs though ?). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
genterminl Guru
Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 523 Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oddly (?) I'm not having any problems with flash on my gentoo box (amd64, nvidia video) but flash doesn't work for me at all on my archlinux box (x86, ati video) in firefox, chromium, or opera - exactly like VoidMages' initial post. This is 11.2.202.228 on both systems. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 6196
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@genterminl:
Well, this might be something.
x86 AMD Athlon XP 2500+ , r200 video type.
what is it for you ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
genterminl Guru
Joined: 12 Feb 2005 Posts: 523 Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@VoidMage -
My working Gentoo is AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+, NVIDIA GPU GeForce 7600 GS using nvidia driver
The problem arch system is AMD Athlon(TM) XP (/proc/cpuinfo gives speed as 1150 - don't remember rating), video ATI Radeon 9200 5961 (AGP) using radeon driver |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 6196
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So it seems our (non-working) hardware is very much alike (though could you give 'model name' instead of 'cpu MHz' ?).
Any ideas if it's the card or the processor ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Strykaas n00b
Joined: 06 Apr 2012 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
I have a similar problem here.
Not using gentoo but Lubuntu 11.10 and Ubuntu 11.04, on different hardware configurations.
The intel + ATI video one does not seem to have any problem with the latest version.
The AMD Athlon Xp 3000+ and ATI Radeo 9800 pro HAS the same problem.
I suspect Adobe decided to stop supporting older CPUs...
Any progress by your sides ?
Strykaas |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Strykaas n00b
Joined: 06 Apr 2012 Posts: 2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
VoidMage Watchman
Joined: 14 Oct 2006 Posts: 6196
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
@Strykaas: is that intel + ATI video still x86 and older radeon ?
I'd like to find out if it can be proven it's CPU, not GPU. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marens Apprentice
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flash updates are seldomly feature updates. The changelog of the ebuild lists the bug from bugs.gentoo.org which informs you about the following:
Quote: | These priority 2 updates address critical vulnerabilities in Adobe Flash Player 11.1.102.63 and earlier versions for Windows, Macintosh, Linux and Solaris, and Adobe Flash Player 11.1.111.7 and earlier versions for Android 3.x and 2.x. These vulnerabilities could cause a crash and potentially allow an attacker to take control of the affected system.
Adobe recommends users of Adobe Flash Player 11.1.102.63 and earlier versions for Windows, Macintosh and Linux update to Adobe Flash Player 11.2.202.228. Users of Adobe Flash Player 11.1.102.63 and earlier versions for Solaris should update to Adobe Flash Player 11.2.202.223. Users of Adobe Flash Player 11.1.111.7 and earlier versions for Android 3.x and earlier versions should update to Flash Player 11.1.111.8. |
No idea how many actively exploited security holes you just opened. Better fallback to html5 videos on youtube and others until the problem is solved. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gusar Advocate
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 2665 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you go read the full security bulletin, you can see that 10.3.183.18 has also been fixed, so Strykaas is safe.
Edit: A new vulnerability has been found, 10.3.183.18 is *not* ok to use. 10.3.183.19 is though.
Edit2: New vulnerabilities found, not even 10.3.183.19 is safe. *Always* get the latest 10.3 from the link I posted above.
Last edited by Gusar on Wed Jul 18, 2012 12:41 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marens Apprentice
Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 173
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gusar wrote: | If you go read the full security bulletin, you can see that 10.3.183.18 has also been fixed, so Strykaas is safe.
10.3.183.18 is ok to use, the 10.3.183.10 that's in portage is not. |
ah cool! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|