Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
USA Ranks 5th
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Earth wrote:
sugar wrote:
There are situations where more compelling arguments can be made about doing the most good for the most people, without doing harm, over an above treating people as a means to an end.


So people can be treated as property, if you feel that an persuasive argument for doing so has been made?


as long as there is no harm.
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
The Earth wrote:
sugar wrote:
There are situations where more compelling arguments can be made about doing the most good for the most people, without doing harm, over an above treating people as a means to an end.


So people can be treated as property, if you feel that an persuasive argument for doing so has been made?


as long as there is no harm.


So you actually don't place human life into a unique category. Interesting...
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sugar
Guru
Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Earth wrote:
So you actually don't place human life into a unique category. Interesting...


do you mean human life or humanity? Unlike Kant, I don't not see humans as being 'special'.
_________________
Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Muso
l33t
l33t


Joined: 22 Oct 2002
Posts: 655
Location: The Holy city of Honolulu

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
The Earth wrote:
So you actually don't place human life into a unique category. Interesting...


do you mean human life or humanity? Unlike Kant, I don't not see humans as being 'special'.


You could have just said "yes".
_________________
If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for the problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball cap
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BonezTheGoon
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 1376
Location: Albuquerque, NM -- birthplace of Microsoft and Gentoo

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sugar wrote:
BonezTheGoon wrote:
My personal ethics on it indicate that it is unethical to allow a murderer to continue to murder (the murderers certainly do not wait for their victims consent) and it is also unethical to cage a murderer indefinitely.


If I could perform some kind of medical procedure on someone that would prevent them from murdering again, you'd be ok with this? Nobody would need to die, and it would be cheaper than having someone on death row for 10 years.


Yes, with two caveats. First, it would have to be just as absolutely "final" as killing them, meaning 100% of the time effective, not 99.99999%. Second, it would have to be something that is not in the realm of torture. This second one gets much harder to define. So I'll ramble a bit about it. It can't leave them like a vegetable, it cannot alter their "personality", it cannot leave them disabled and unable to pursue their interests, in essence it has to be a "perfect solution" that only changes their behavior of killing/raping/etc. Since I do not believe such a "miracle cure" is possible without wild side-effects I do not discuss it or pursue it in general, but I felt your question deserved a very honest (albeit, IMO, science fiction) answer. Yes, this science-fiction-based answer can illustrate my thinking and reasoning further, but I do not believe it is a worthwhile conversation when you start to actually consider applying it.

[Edit] I also think that the party should have a choice as well, they can either opt for the surgery or accept death. As I stated earlier in the thread I do not believe that they should be forced to undergo surgery against their will. I believe it much more ethical, honorable, and natural to kill someone against their will than it is to "alter" them against their will. Again, a big part of my reasoning for that is that we all must die, it is inescapable and natural, but no one should be forced to go through something like surgery if they don't want it.
_________________
mcgruff wrote:
I can't promise to be civil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BoneKracker
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 1487
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would have to prevent them from committing violent crime in general. Otherwise, your serial killer would just go around lobotomizing people or turning them into paraplegics or whatever.

And, then you're carrying out the plot of A Clockwork Orange. :lol:
_________________
Oldthinkers unbellyfeel INGSOC.
-- Headline of a document on Winston Smith's terminal in his cubicle at the Ministry of Truth, seen briefly in the background in one scene of the movie rendition of Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BonezTheGoon
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 1376
Location: Albuquerque, NM -- birthplace of Microsoft and Gentoo

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, I'm really curious for the people here who are against the death penalty regarding people risking their own lives for pleasure and sport. What do you think about them? Should someone be allowed to rock-climb without rope thousands of feet above the ground? Should we allow people to risk their own lives for their own interests? Should there be laws in place that mitigate the risks that individuals can take with their own lives?
_________________
mcgruff wrote:
I can't promise to be civil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BonezTheGoon
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 14 Jun 2002
Posts: 1376
Location: Albuquerque, NM -- birthplace of Microsoft and Gentoo

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoneKracker wrote:
It would have to prevent them from committing violent crime in general. Otherwise, your serial killer would just go around lobotomizing people or turning them into paraplegics or whatever.

And, then you're carrying out the plot of A Clockwork Orange. :lol:


Agreed, that's sort of what I was implying with my comment:

BonezTheGoon wrote:
it has to be a "perfect solution" that only changes their behavior of killing/raping/etc.


with my "etc"
_________________
mcgruff wrote:
I can't promise to be civil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum