| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who will win? |
| Sebastian Vettel |
|
35% |
[ 7 ] |
| Fernando Alonso |
|
15% |
[ 3 ] |
| Mark Webber |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Lewis Hamilton |
|
20% |
[ 4 ] |
| Jenson Button |
|
15% |
[ 3 ] |
| Nico Rosberg |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Michael Schumacher |
|
15% |
[ 3 ] |
| Felipe Massa |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Vitaly Petrov |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Nick Neidfeld |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 20 |
|
| Author |
Message |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:35 pm Post subject: [F1] Who will stop Sebastian Vettel? |
|
|
This thread is a follow on from last years.
There are a lot of changes in the sport this year.
A new tyre supplier, who is creating tyres that will wear much faster,
107% rule is back in force,
The f-duct has been banned
Teams will only be entitled to a set number of times where they can work on the car between midnight and 6am,
An adjustable rear wing will be allowed (but at only certain sections of the track, and only if following another driver)
An Indian GP has been added to the calendar, bringing the number of races to 19, although it's unclear if there will be a race in Bahrain this year.
After one race, the current odds at my local TAB is as follows
1 Sebastian Vettel 1.67
3 Lewis Hamilton 4.50
2 Fernando Alonso 6.00
4 Mark Webber 10.00
5 Jenson Button 10.00
6 Nico Rosberg 40.00
7 Michael Schumacher 40.00
9 Felipe Massa 50.00
14 Vitaly Petrov 50.00
25 Nick Heidfeld 100.00 _________________ Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aidanjt Veteran


Joined: 20 Feb 2005 Posts: 1101 Location: Rep. of Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So the FIA haven't introduced an 'everyone must drive at the same speed' or the all important 'no overtaking' rule yet. _________________
| juniper wrote: | | you experience political reality dilation when travelling at american political speeds. it's in einstein's formulas. it's not their fault. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AidanJT wrote: | | So the FIA haven't introduced an 'everyone must drive at the same speed' or the all important 'no overtaking' rule yet. |
The opposite in fact.
Brenie is a supporter of introducing artificial rain (i.e. track side sprinkler systems) in order to liven things up a bit. _________________ Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wildhorse Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 148 Location: Estados Unidos De América
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't you confuse rain with riot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Excellent drives from both Button and Webber, both having problems but clawing it back. Hamilton was unlucky with Alonso being a retard behind him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | McLaren's Lewis Hamilton and Ferrari's Fernando Alonso have been hit with 20-second penalties following a collision in Sunday's Malaysian Grand Prix.
The verdict means that Hamilton drops from seventh to eighth place, although Alonso retains sixth.
Hamilton's penalty was for making more than one change of direction while defending in the build-up to the clash. Alonso's was for causing a collision.
Alonso clipped the McLaren when trying to pass Hamilton after Turn Three.
|
link _________________ Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Advocate


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 2241 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Pirelli tyres seem to favour Button's driving style while Hamilton beats the crap out of them, losing the race in the end. _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | The Pirelli tyres seem to favour Button's driving style while Hamilton beats the crap out of them, losing the race in the end. | not the softs though. Everyone loves the softs but Button seems to drive way better on the hard compound.
Which one is the "option" this year? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bbe Apprentice

Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 158 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| charly wrote: | | genstorm wrote: | | The Pirelli tyres seem to favour Button's driving style while Hamilton beats the crap out of them, losing the race in the end. | not the softs though. Everyone loves the softs but Button seems to drive way better on the hard compound.
Which one is the "option" this year? |
The softer tire is usually referred to as the "option", but in a dry race drivers must use both compounds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How good is that new kid...? Di Resta is going to be a star in the future |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Advocate


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 2241 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| charly wrote: | | How good is that new kid...? Di Resta is going to be a star in the future |
hmm. he was involved in two accidents. he should learn2drive _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | charly wrote: | | How good is that new kid...? Di Resta is going to be a star in the future |
hmm. he was involved in two accidents. he should learn2drive | I think you're thinking of Perez
Btw, that was one of the best races ever. I feel sorry for Button but Hamilton just showed that he's the best overtaker in the field. In fact I can't think of a time Hamilton passed someone in the DRS area |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Advocate


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 2241 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
true, sry.
Anyway, big race for Webber  _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | true, sry.
Anyway, big race for Webber  | Yeah, Webber proved again that he can match anyone. He's so undervalued it's untrue. If he had a car that *worked* he'd be up there with Vettel every day |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bbe Apprentice

Joined: 10 Jan 2005 Posts: 158 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | true, sry.
Anyway, big race for Webber  |
Webber made an interesting comment after the race concerning the new tires. He jested that they should sit out qualifying in future to keep all the sets of soft tire fresh for the race because they are such a huge advantage on track. Hamilton also deliberately saved a set of softs for the race which would have ordinarily been used for setting a qualifying lap. Interesting strategy decisions to come on the tires I think! Anyway a very good race for the spectator. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bbe wrote: | | genstorm wrote: | true, sry.
Anyway, big race for Webber  |
Webber made an interesting comment after the race concerning the new tires. He jested that they should sit out qualifying in future to keep all the sets of soft tire fresh for the race because they are such a huge advantage on track. Hamilton also deliberately saved a set of softs for the race which would have ordinarily been used for setting a qualifying lap. Interesting strategy decisions to come on the tires I think! Anyway a very good race for the spectator. | What are the chances we see the middle teams only using hard tyres in qualifying? I dont think the top 4 teams can because getting on pole is still important but anyone below Mercedes/Ferrari can |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
petrjanda Veteran


Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 1557 Location: Brno, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
They need to reintroduce refueling. The current "no refuel" stance is ridiculous. Sure the tires degrade more now but we need to see more team strategy.
Even better would be to stop this over-regulation shit that they have been doing for the last 20 years and let the teams invent their own stuff without constantly looking back at FIA and asking "is it allowed?" The only regulation should be team budget limit so that teams with more money don't have that advantage. _________________ There is, a not-born, a not-become, a not-made, a not-compounded. If that unborn, not-become, not-made, not-compounded were not, there would be no escape from this here that is born, become, made and compounded. - Gautama Siddharta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| petrjanda wrote: | They need to reintroduce refueling. The current "no refuel" stance is ridiculous. Sure the tires degrade more now but we need to see more team strategy.
Even better would be to stop this over-regulation shit that they have been doing for the last 20 years and let the teams invent their own stuff without constantly looking back at FIA and asking "is it allowed?" The only regulation should be team budget limit so that teams with more money don't have that advantage. |
why should the teams have to make people unemployed just to meet the salary cap? that seems awfully heavy handed. _________________ Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
charly n00b


Joined: 05 Apr 2011 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| petrjanda wrote: | They need to reintroduce refueling. The current "no refuel" stance is ridiculous. Sure the tires degrade more now but we need to see more team strategy.
Even better would be to stop this over-regulation shit that they have been doing for the last 20 years and let the teams invent their own stuff without constantly looking back at FIA and asking "is it allowed?" The only regulation should be team budget limit so that teams with more money don't have that advantage. | A quote from Malaysia by Eddie Jordan on the BBC: | Quote: | | Why bother with all the problems associated with the use and distribution of high octane fuel when you have tyres that force you to stop just as much or even more? |
He's right though, they've managed to simulate the same with the added bonus of increasing the cars unpredictability and decreasing the danger of fuel being around things that are 1000c |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sugar Guru


Joined: 07 Aug 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Morrinsville, New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| charly wrote: | | petrjanda wrote: | They need to reintroduce refueling. The current "no refuel" stance is ridiculous. Sure the tires degrade more now but we need to see more team strategy.
Even better would be to stop this over-regulation shit that they have been doing for the last 20 years and let the teams invent their own stuff without constantly looking back at FIA and asking "is it allowed?" The only regulation should be team budget limit so that teams with more money don't have that advantage. | A quote from Malaysia by Eddie Jordan on the BBC: | Quote: | | Why bother with all the problems associated with the use and distribution of high octane fuel when you have tyres that force you to stop just as much or even more? |
He's right though, they've managed to simulate the same with the added bonus of increasing the cars unpredictability and decreasing the danger of fuel being around things that are 1000c |
++ _________________ Jesus Could Be Their Candidate and the Republicans Would Still Lose |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
petrjanda Veteran


Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 1557 Location: Brno, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sugar wrote: |
why should the teams have to make people unemployed just to meet the salary cap? that seems awfully heavy handed.
|
Because it's about competition, not employment. There is not much competition when the top 3 teams have 500 mil/year budget and others only 100 mil. _________________ There is, a not-born, a not-become, a not-made, a not-compounded. If that unborn, not-become, not-made, not-compounded were not, there would be no escape from this here that is born, become, made and compounded. - Gautama Siddharta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
petrjanda Veteran


Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 1557 Location: Brno, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| charly wrote: |
He's right though, they've managed to simulate the same with the added bonus of increasing the cars unpredictability and decreasing the danger of fuel being around things that are 1000c |
I've been watching f1 since around 1992. The worst (entertainment wise) years were from around 2003 till last year. The last 2 years were so bad I actually stopped watching after the first 5 laps. I like seeing team strategy, qualifying on different fuels, different tires, fuck ups in pit stops. What I don't like seeing is team's no longer racing, just cruising when they start running out of fuel which has been the case numerous times since they reintroduced no-fuel policy. _________________ There is, a not-born, a not-become, a not-made, a not-compounded. If that unborn, not-become, not-made, not-compounded were not, there would be no escape from this here that is born, become, made and compounded. - Gautama Siddharta |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|