| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mkyral
Apprentice
Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 185
Location: Czech Republic
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:10 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Still struggling with the git migration it seems, when you can read things like that:
| Code: | Bump okular to real 4.6.4 with one big patch, since upstream packaged the
code of ~4.6.1 into the 4.6.4 tarball |
as seen in http://packages.gentoo.org/package/kde-base/okular |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
firephoto
Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 1612
Location: +48° 5' 23.40", -119° 48' 30.00"
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They're talking about skipping beta2 and going to RC now on the release mailinglist which if it means creating the 4.7 branch is just what I've been waiting for. 
_________________
#gentoo-kde on freenode |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
asturm
Developer
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 8936
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RC1 usually is 4.6.90. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
firephoto
Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 1612
Location: +48° 5' 23.40", -119° 48' 30.00"
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| genstorm wrote: | | RC1 usually is 4.6.90. |
4.7 branch as in git and subversion. I've been on the latest branch and haven't built from a tarball in... years I guess. It's a lot easier to get fixes without waiting for the next minor release and it's always in good shape which trunk isn't at times. I just maintain sets for all the installed live kde-base ebuilds and one for everything else.
From the quietness here and on irc I'm guessing I'm one of the very few on live branch ebuilds these days or else everyone has the good luck I do with them (most of the time).
_________________
#gentoo-kde on freenode |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bers
n00b
Joined: 28 Nov 2008
Posts: 49
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| firephoto wrote: | | They're talking about skipping beta2 and going to RC now on the release mailinglist which if it means creating the 4.7 branch is just what I've been waiting for. |
Ok, let's wait  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ejs76
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 148
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
4.6.90 (RC1) has just been tagged:
http://websvn.kde.org/tags/KDE/?sortdir=down#dirlist
So they're only one day behind on their original schedule. And following the schedule the tarballs should be released tomorrow.
_________________
~amd64
PhenomII x4 955 | MSI 790GX-G65 | ATI Radeon 5770 | 8GB DDR3 1333 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ejs76
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 148
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Korhul
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 75
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just tried to compile digikam 2.0.0_rc by copying ebuilds for beta6 to my local overlay. It fails with:
| Code: | [ 11%] [ 11%] [ 11%] [ 12%] Building CXX object digikam/CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/__/libs/threadimageio/pgfutils.o
Building CXX object digikam/CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/__/libs/widgets/common/ditemtooltip.o
Building CXX object digikam/CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/__/libs/widgets/common/dpopupmenu.o
Building CXX object digikam/CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/__/libs/widgets/common/dlogoaction.o
/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/digikam-2.0.0_rc/work/digikam-2.0.0-rc/core/libs/threadimageio/pgfutils.cpp: In function ‘bool Digikam::writePGFImageData(const QImage&, QByteArray&, int)’:
/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/digikam-2.0.0_rc/work/digikam-2.0.0-rc/core/libs/threadimageio/pgfutils.cpp:154: error: invalid conversion from ‘UINT32*’ to ‘int’
/var/tmp/portage/media-gfx/digikam-2.0.0_rc/work/digikam-2.0.0-rc/core/libs/threadimageio/pgfutils.cpp:154: error: initializing argument 2 of ‘void CPGFImage::Write(CPGFStream*, int, bool (*)(double, bool, void*), UINT32*, void*)’
make[2]: *** [digikam/CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/__/libs/threadimageio/pgfutils.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [digikam/CMakeFiles/digikamcore.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
firephoto
Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Posts: 1612
Location: +48° 5' 23.40", -119° 48' 30.00"
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Korhul wrote: | Just tried to compile digikam 2.0.0_rc by copying ebuilds for beta6 to my local overlay. It fails with:
|
Same here, building against 4.7 (branch) updated yesterday. I bumped the libkface and libkmap too.
Qt 4.7.4 too.
This is also my first attempt at digikam 2 so I don't know if anything similar has happened previously with the betas.
_________________
#gentoo-kde on freenode |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Korhul
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 75
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Beta6 works for me. But there's bug that prevents face recognition from working. Should be working in RC. I have also bumped libkmap and libkface. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
houtworm
Guru
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 391
Location: Den Haag, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok I tried 4.6.90 and that works, except that i had to use
USE="-python" emerge -u marble
Now I tried to install 4.7.49.9999 and again trouble with marble.
| Code: | >>> Preparing source in /mnt/data/tmp/portage/kde-base/marble-4.7.49.9999/work/marble-4.7.49.9999 ...
.[32;01m*.[0m Applying marble-4.6.2-magic.patch ...
.[31;01m*.[0m Failed Patch: marble-4.6.2-magic.patch !
.[31;01m*.[0m ( /var/lib/layman/kde/kde-base/marble/files/marble-4.6.2-magic.patch )
.[31;01m*.[0m
.[31;01m*.[0m Include in your bugreport the contents of:
.[31;01m*.[0m
.[31;01m*.[0m /mnt/data/tmp/portage/kde-base/marble-4.7.49.9999/temp/marble-4.6.2-magic.patch.out |
and in magic.patch.out:
| Code: | ***** marble-4.6.2-magic.patch *****
====================================
PATCH COMMAND: patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < '/var/lib/layman/kde/kde-base/marble/files/marble-4.6.2-magi
====================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -ruN marble-4.6.2.orig/marble/src/plugins/positionprovider/CMakeLists.txt marble-4.6.2/marble/src/plugins/positio
|--- marble-4.6.2.orig/marble/src/plugins/positionprovider/CMakeLists.txt 2011-01-19 23:06:11.000000000 +0100
|+++ marble-4.6.2/marble/src/plugins/positionprovider/CMakeLists.txt 2011-04-11 03:56:00.449066967 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch. Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
====================================
[rest skipped..] |
masking marble-4.7.49.9999 is even worse:
| Code: | The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed:
#required by kde-base/kdeedu-meta-4.7.49.9999, required by kde-base/kde-meta-4.7.49.9999, required by @selected, required by @world (argument)
>=kde-base/marble-9999 ** |
so.. without marble it is not possible to install kde-4.7.49.9999
Is there any way to install marble-4.7.49.9999? Or to skip it?
--Kees
_________________
niemand is onbekwamer, dan een timmerman zonder hamer
Kees |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Biert
n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 45
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I noticed that some ebuilds for the KDE Telepathy project are in the overlay now. It seems to me some are missing though, to the point where some basic functionality is missing.
In order for the telepathy-presence-applet to work, telepathy-presence-dataengine should be installed as well. Then there are the integration daemon (telepathy-nepomuk-service), and some more pieces.
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/network/telepathy has a list of the subprojects involved. I've created basic ebuilds for most of them in my personal overlay and they all work (telepathy-kde had some icon file collisions though). Seems to work well, although I've not tested much yet. At least I can set my nickname and status via the plasmoid now 
I'll happily supply the ebuilds I've cooked up for anyone interested.
_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/Biert/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
houtworm
Guru
Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 391
Location: Den Haag, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
today came a new magic patch for marble.
Yeah! now it works.
Ok, now I try to install the rest of 4.7
_________________
niemand is onbekwamer, dan een timmerman zonder hamer
Kees |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does amarok 2.4.1 compile for you guys with 4.7rc1?
Also, what about grub integration? I don't see a menu to select what to reboot into |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Biert
n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 45
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NForce wrote: | | Does amarok 2.4.1 compile for you guys with 4.7rc1? |
Fails for me too
| Code: | Linking CXX shared module ../../../../lib/amarok_data_engine_upcomingEvents.so
distcc[12765] ERROR: compile (null) on localhost failed
In file included from /var/tmp/portage/media-sound/amarok-2.4.1/work/amarok-2.4.1/src/context/scriptengine/javascript/simplejavascriptapplet.cpp:43:
/var/tmp/portage/media-sound/amarok-2.4.1/work/amarok-2.4.1/src/context/scriptengine/javascript/bind_dataengine.h:32: error: redefinition of 'struct QMetaTypeId<Plasma::Service*>'
/usr/include/plasma/service.h:321: error: previous definition of 'struct QMetaTypeId<Plasma::Service*>'
In file included from /var/tmp/portage/media-sound/amarok-2.4.1/work/amarok-2.4.1/src/context/scriptengine/javascript/simplejavascriptapplet.cpp:43:
/var/tmp/portage/media-sound/amarok-2.4.1/work/amarok-2.4.1/src/context/scriptengine/javascript/bind_dataengine.h:33: error: redefinition of 'struct QMetaTypeId<Plasma::ServiceJob*>'
/usr/include/KDE/Plasma/../../plasma/servicejob.h:136: error: previous definition of 'struct QMetaTypeId<Plasma::ServiceJob*>'
make[2]: *** [src/context/scriptengine/javascript/CMakeFiles/amarok_appletscript_simple_javascript.dir/simplejavascriptapplet.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/context/scriptengine/javascript/CMakeFiles/amarok_appletscript_simple_javascript.dir/all] Error 2
|
| NForce wrote: | | Also, what about grub integration? I don't see a menu to select what to reboot into |
I think it's only grub2 integration, current Gentoo stable (and keyword, for that matter) is grub-0.97. You'll have to unmask grub-1.98, 1.99 or 9999 for the integration
https://ksmanis.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/hello-planet-and-grub2-support-for-kdm/
_________________
http://www.last.fm/user/Biert/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored
Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 206
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have grub2. Integration does not work 
Also Amarok fails too, trying newly released beta (not in overlay... yet?). 72% now
[EDIT]
Yes - amarok-2.4.1.90 builds fine with KDE 4.6.90 Hopefully ebuild will land soon.
I have also problem with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 during install phase. Anyone?
Also after overlay cleanup my kde-meta and kde-l10n wants to be downgraded. They weren't upgraded to 4.6.90? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NForce
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, I use grub2 too - integration does not work |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Herring42
Guru
Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Posts: 373
Location: Buckinghamshire
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lustmored wrote: |
I have also problem with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 during install phase. Anyone?
|
Yes, I'm having problems here too
_________________
"The problem with quotes on the internet is that it is difficult
to determine whether or not they are genuine." -- Abraham Lincoln |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lmarcini
Guru
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 534
Location: Plouyé (Brittany / France)
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Herring42 wrote: | | Lustmored wrote: |
I have also problem with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 during install phase. Anyone?
|
Yes, I'm having problems here too |
Same problem here with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 and amarok-2.4.1...
_________________
umount /dev/brain |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Loko123
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Feb 2011
Posts: 91
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lmarcini wrote: | | Herring42 wrote: | | Lustmored wrote: |
I have also problem with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 during install phase. Anyone?
|
Yes, I'm having problems here too |
Same problem here with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 and amarok-2.4.1... |
amarok-9999 compiled fine here. (9999) But phonon-xine fails and also marble & system-config-printer-kde.
But I enjoy KDE SC 4.7 RC 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lustmored
Apprentice
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 206
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You have tarballs somehow?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cruzki123
Apprentice
Joined: 16 May 2008
Posts: 262
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Loko123 wrote: | | lmarcini wrote: | | Herring42 wrote: | | Lustmored wrote: |
I have also problem with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 during install phase. Anyone?
|
Yes, I'm having problems here too |
Same problem here with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 and amarok-2.4.1... |
amarok-9999 compiled fine here. (9999) But phonon-xine fails and also marble & system-config-printer-kde.
But I enjoy KDE SC 4.7 RC 2 |
Where did you find the tarballs? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lmarcini
Guru
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Posts: 534
Location: Plouyé (Brittany / France)
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cruzki123 wrote: | | Loko123 wrote: | | lmarcini wrote: | | Herring42 wrote: | | Lustmored wrote: |
I have also problem with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 during install phase. Anyone?
|
Yes, I'm having problems here too |
Same problem here with pykde4-4.6.90-r1 and amarok-2.4.1... |
amarok-9999 compiled fine here. (9999) But phonon-xine fails and also marble & system-config-printer-kde.
But I enjoy KDE SC 4.7 RC 2 |
Where did you find the tarballs? |
Yes: where ?
PS : Amarok 2.4.1.90 compiles fine now!
EDIT : tarballs are available now!
_________________
umount /dev/brain |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Herring42
Guru
Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Posts: 373
Location: Buckinghamshire
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lmarcini wrote: | | EDIT : tarballs are available now! |
Yay!
Compiling now
EDIT: All done 
_________________
"The problem with quotes on the internet is that it is difficult
to determine whether or not they are genuine." -- Abraham Lincoln |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
