View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2002 11:58 pm Post subject: emerge mozilla |
|
|
An easy one here. For three days, I have been trying to emerge mozilla. I've done "emerge mozilla" and "emerge net-www/mozilla" and it can't find a match. I've rsync'd before emerging. It's me, right? Tell me it's me. Can any of you do a "pretend" on this to see if you can? I'm baffled. _________________ Registered Linux User #251974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pjp Administrator
Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Posts: 20067
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Does emerge -s mozilla output anything similar to this: Code: | # emerge -s mozilla
[ Results for search key : mozilla ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]
* net-www/mozilla
Latest version Available: 1.0-r3
Latest version Installed: 1.0-r2
Homepage: http://www.mozilla.org
Description:
The Mozilla Web Browser |
_________________ Quis separabit? Quo animo? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I get:
bash-2.05a# emerge -s mozilla
[ Results for search key : mozilla ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]
* net-www/mozilla
Latest version Available: 1.0-r3
Latest version Installed: [ Not Installed ]
Homepage: http://www.mozilla.org
Description:
The Mozilla Web Browser
When I "emerge mozilla" I get:
Calculating dependencies |
!!! Error: couldn't find match for : in net-www/mozilla-1.0-r3
BTW, I can emerge other programs, just not mozilla. Thanks for quick reply. _________________ Registered Linux User #251974
Last edited by BWW on Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delta407 Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Apr 2002 Posts: 2876 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
What doese "emerge mozilla" output? _________________ I don't believe in witty sigs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nitro Bodhisattva
Joined: 08 Apr 2002 Posts: 661 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:13 am Post subject: Re: emerge mozilla |
|
|
BWW wrote: | An easy one here. For three days, I have been trying to emerge mozilla. I've done "emerge mozilla" and "emerge net-www/mozilla" and it can't find a match. I've rsync'd before emerging. It's me, right? Tell me it's me. Can any of you do a "pretend" on this to see if you can? I'm baffled. |
Does the following work (the ebuild file itself exists right)? Code: | emerge /usr/portage/net-www/mozilla/mozilla-1.0-r3.ebuild -p |
Have you done an emerge --clean rsync recently? Maybe you have something screwy in your Portage tree. _________________ - Kyle Manna
Please, please SEARCH before posting.
There are three kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and those who can't. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did an "emerge --clean rsync" and it deleted the old tree and built another. I then:
bash-2.05a# emerge /usr/portage/net-www/mozilla/mozilla-1.0-r3.ebuild -p
Results:
These are the packages that I would merge, in order.
Calculating dependencies |
!!! Error: couldn't find match for : in net-www/mozilla-1.0-r3
I just emerged bzflag without any trouble. _________________ Registered Linux User #251974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Any unusual USE flags? Have you ever had any previous version of Mozilla installed on this machine before? _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
No mozilla before. I just built this last Satuday. I'm just using the flags that came with the stage3 tarball and am using Portage version 1.9.10.
Flags:
USE="3dnow apm arts avi berkdb crypt cups encode gdbm gif gpm gtk imlib ipv6 java jpeg kde libg++ libwww mikmod mmx motif mpeg ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl pam pdflib png python qt qtmt quicktime readline sdl slang spell ssl svga tcpd truetype X xml2 xmms xv" _________________ Registered Linux User #251974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I just did a little different syntax of "emerge sync --clean" with same results for mozilla. I went ahead and emerged qtella as that's a good killer app just to make sure it was working. <BLOP!> ...the sound of one's head banging against a wall... _________________ Registered Linux User #251974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rac Bodhisattva
Joined: 30 May 2002 Posts: 6553 Location: Japanifornia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
BWW wrote: | Portage version 1.9.10. |
May I suggest a portage update? I am running 2.0.13 here. _________________ For every higher wall, there is a taller ladder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
masseya Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 2602 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you checked in your /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask to see if it somehow got masked? _________________ if i never try anything, i never learn anything..
if i never take a risk, i stay where i am.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delta407 Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Apr 2002 Posts: 2876 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tristam29 wrote: | Have you checked in your /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask to see if it somehow got masked? |
If it was masked, emerge -s would show an earlier version. Also, note the line:
Code: | !!! Error: couldn't find match for : in net-www/mozilla-1.0-r3 |
If you look at other missing dependencies error messages, they take this form:
Code: | !!! Error: couldn't find match for =silly-people/yourmom-2.0 in silly-people/you-1.6-r4 |
Thus, it seems Portage thinks mozilla depends on ":"... in short, it's not a masking thing. _________________ I don't believe in witty sigs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
masseya Bodhisattva
Joined: 17 Apr 2002 Posts: 2602 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I summarily withdraw the inquiry and yield my time to the floor. _________________ if i never try anything, i never learn anything..
if i never take a risk, i stay where i am.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a portion of the mask file concerning mozilla:
# These ones are untested, and introduce new stuff
# azarah - 28 May 2002
=x11-base/xfree-4.2.0-r11
#=net-www/mozilla-1.0-r2
=net-www/mozilla-1.0_rc3-r2
# This is the gtk2 branch of our test-stuff.
# Spider - 28 May 2002
=net-www/mozilla-1.0_rc3-r50
=net-www/mozilla-1.0_rc3-r51
if I'm seeing this right, masking isn't the problem. Hmmm, new portage version.....something to consider.... _________________ Registered Linux User #251974
Last edited by BWW on Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:33 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delta407 Bodhisattva
Joined: 23 Apr 2002 Posts: 2876 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try this:
Code: | # emerge -u portage |
That'll bring you from 1.9.10 (which is old!) to 2.0.13, and might fix your problem. _________________ I don't believe in witty sigs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
w00kie n00b
Joined: 16 Jun 2002 Posts: 18 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for info :
I had the exact same problem 10min ago on my laptop
upgrading portage solved it
thanks dudes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
3fps n00b
Joined: 14 Jul 2002 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
delta407 wrote: | Try this:
Code: | # emerge -u portage |
That'll bring you from 1.9.10 (which is old!) to 2.0.13, and might fix your problem. |
thats exactly the thing i did to fix the same problem. upgrade portage and you'll probably be just fine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BWW n00b
Joined: 05 May 2002 Posts: 34 Location: Oklahoma
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2002 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Getting the new Portage solved my problems. Shoot, I would have thought it would have been in the tarball I downloaded when I compiled the system, but no matter. It works. Thanks for all the help, fellas. _________________ Registered Linux User #251974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|