View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bglxx n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 11 Location: Cologne/Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:10 am Post subject: [SOLVED] why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
Dear list members,
I try to install xorg and see, that it needs hal to work. May be I'm reading wrong docs, but I've read, that it needs the hal daemon to work. Doc is http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
Why did emerge not automatically install the hal daemon?
Thanks for answering this
Last edited by bglxx on Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:50 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Letharion Veteran
Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 1344 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | By default, Xorg uses HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) to detect and configure devices such as keyboards and mice. |
My interpretation is that you can make do without HAL.
I can't answer for the devs motivation, but there's a "hal" use flag on x11-base/xorg-server. Enable it and you will get hal pulled in as dependency. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sera Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 Posts: 1017 Location: CET
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:22 am Post subject: Re: why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
bglxx wrote: | Dear list members,
I try to install xorg and see, that it needs hal to work. May be I'm reading wrong docs, but I've read, that it needs the hal daemon to work. Doc is http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
Why did emerge not automatically install the hal daemon?
Thanks for answering this |
Hal was the preferred way to set up input devices in 1.6 and 1.7. The recommended way for 1.8 is using udev. Hal is deprecated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bglxx n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 11 Location: Cologne/Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:18 am Post subject: Re: why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
sera wrote: |
Hal was the preferred way to set up input devices in 1.6 and 1.7. The recommended way for 1.8 is using udev. Hal is deprecated. |
Sera, thanks for this. This was my fear so I asked this list.
But unfortunately 1.8 isn't stable and I need to setup a production environment.
What do you think is the better way:
1. Use unstable 1.8
2. Use 1.7 and try to work without hal - if this is possible. Is there any how-to available?
Thanks in advance - Bernd |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Letharion Veteran
Joined: 13 Jun 2005 Posts: 1344 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't tried 1.8, but it's been out for fairly long now, so I would guess that it works fairly well. 1.9 was even released recently.
Trying a few programs from unstable usually isn't a problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John R. Graham Administrator
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 10587 Location: Somewhere over Atlanta, Georgia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:40 am Post subject: Re: why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
bglxx wrote: | But unfortunately 1.8 isn't stable and I need to setup a production environment.
What do you think is the better way:
1. Use unstable 1.8
2. Use 1.7 and try to work without hal - if this is possible. Is there any how-to available?
Thanks in advance - Bernd | Best way for stable installations is to install hal (which will happen automatigically if you enable the hal USE flag and reinstall xorg-server). Won't be the best way for the next release, but is for now.
Incidentally, the lack of the hal USE flag may indicate that you've chosen a non-optimal profile for your intended use of the computer. Are you using one of the desktop profiles? Run Code: | eselect profile list | grep \* | if you're not sure.
- John _________________ I can confirm that I have received between 0 and 499 National Security Letters.
Last edited by John R. Graham on Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:52 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bglxx n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 11 Location: Cologne/Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:49 am Post subject: Re: why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
John R. Graham wrote: | Best way for stable installations is to install hal (which will happen automatigically if you enable the hal USE flag and reinstall xorg-server). Won't be the best way for the next release, but is for now.
Incidentally, the lack of the hal USE flag may indicate that you've chosen a non-optimal profile for your intended use of the computer. Are you using one of the desktop profiles?
- John |
Hi John,
thanks for this advise. Now I'm installing hal to have a stable system.
Have a nice day - Bernd |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bglxx n00b
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 11 Location: Cologne/Germany
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:54 am Post subject: Re: why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
John R. Graham wrote: |
Incidentally, the lack of the hal USE flag may indicate that you've chosen a non-optimal profile for your intended use of the computer. Are you using one of the desktop profiles? Run Code: | eselect profile list | grep * | if you're not sure.
- John |
No, I'm using standard profile. This happens because I've copied setup files from my typical server installaltions.
Now I use .../desktop profile.
Thanks too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sera Retired Dev
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 Posts: 1017 Location: CET
|
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:55 am Post subject: Re: why is xorg-ebeuild not installing hal |
|
|
bglxx wrote: | 1. Use unstable 1.8 |
I'm using 1.8 for many months without issues I'm aware of.
Quote: | 2. Use 1.7 and try to work without hal - if this is possible. Is there any how-to available? |
Hal is recommended for 1.7 and as John pointed out not hard to set up. If you want you should also be able to define your input devices as done for xservers before 1.6 (man xorg.conf of 1.3 for instance). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|