View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:49 am Post subject: Any suggestion how to replace www-plugins/gecko-mediaplayer |
|
|
Hi everyone, I would like to remove firefox and all the deps from xulrunner.
Right now, I use www-client/chromium, but I don't know what can replace gecko-mediaplayer or the old mplayerplug-in ?
Any suggestion ?
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yngwin Retired Dev
Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4572 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think there is any multimedia plugin for browsers that does not use xulrunner. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok then, but xulrunner is pretty long to compile and actually, I tought that xulrunner was use only with mozilla products.
I was wrong |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joseph K. Guru
Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 436 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was just about to post a new thread on this exact topic, so I'll hijack yours instead.
What is the story with the xulrunner dependency? It seems like an awfully big dependency just for a plugin to run in Chromium, considering that for example the Java plugin does not require it. Is there any possibility that those plugins (gecko-mediaplayer and vlc) could be redesigned so that xulrunner is an optional dependency? Or does xulrunner actually provide important services that they can't do without or get from Chromium? Thanks in advance to whomever can actually answer these questions! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The XFCE media player, parole, provides an nsplugin, but does not depend on xulrunner.
Too bad I never got it to work. Also, it seems that the newest ebuild in Portage does not support building it, though the older versions do. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gusar Advocate
Joined: 09 Apr 2005 Posts: 2665 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
From what I know, it's just a compile-time dependency. So you don't actually need to keep xulrunner around after gecko-mediaplayer is compiled. If the ebuild has xulrunner as run-time dependency, that's a mistake.
Maybe it'd be possible to compile gecko-mediaplayer by downloading the xulrunner sdk and then pointing the gecko-mediaplayer build system towards that. That way you avoid the lengthy xulrunner compile times. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hypnos Advocate
Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 2889 Location: Omnipresent
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed, that's how Parole does it -- the source just has a copy of the xulrunner header files. _________________ Personal overlay | Simple backup scheme |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joseph K. Guru
Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 436 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very interesting, thank you! I shall open a bug report now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|