View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pingufunkybeat l33t
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Does anyone know how opengl works with open source driver and Radeon 4770? |
It works fine for many things up to OpenGL 2.1, but some of the most challenging games do not work great. I don't think that ETQW works at the moment.
You can check http://wiki.x.org/wiki/RadeonProgram for a list of games. Keep in mind that some of the info is outdated. ETQW was tested with Mesa 7.7, and lots of things were improved for HD3000+ in Mesa 7.8.
If you do give it a try, it's good to use the latest and greatest git versions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shkador n00b
Joined: 21 May 2006 Posts: 46 Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I did try with the latest (git) mesa and xf86-video-ati from the X11 overlay, but all I got working is Warsow, ETQW fails bad. Compiz works fine though, and the overall feeling is realy nice, it feels so like nvidia binary driver I used so much to.
Quote: | Anyway, in this Gentoo forum thread, the subject of installing the 10.4 beta fglrx driver is discussed, and in my post here, I described in detail how I configured my kernel, xorg.conf, and installed both the 10.4 beta fglrx driver, as well as a patched xorg-server 1.8.0, (in order to work with the driver). |
Funny thing, I somehow stumbled upon this bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310367
It turns out that =x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.721 were actually 10.4 beta driver taken off the new Ubuntu 10.04. It does work well and with stable xorg 1.7.6 (on amd64 profile) but once in a while it stops responding. Not that much of a problem but I hate being interrupted while playing.
So... at the moment I'm building kernel without framebuffer support so I can get back to fglrx, two days of no ETQW is just too much for me
I will try 10.4 from portage as I just did eix-sync maybe it will help. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leo.the_zoo Apprentice
Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Posts: 160 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sooo happy I bought laptop with nvidia... I don't have to go through the ati-specific issues described above, everything is working like charm. I had no problems with X configuration and even some apps that were not working properly with ati and desktop effects are doing fine. My vote goes to nvidia. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cst Apprentice
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 203 Location: /proc
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
for Linux nVidia is a lot better _________________ i7 3930K @ 4GHz
MSI X79A-GD45 (8D)
32GB 1600 MHz DDR3 Samsung
Samsung 840 PRO, 2xSamsung HD502HJ in RAID 1
MSI GTX 980Ti
latest gentoo-sources on x86_64 Fluxbox (amd64)
best render farm: www.GarageFarm.NET |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frostschutz Advocate
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Posts: 2977 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an ATI HD 5850, running ~amd64 Gentoo, Linux 2.6.34 and Xorg 1.8 - with no stability or performance issues whatsoever. Sure, I had to patch Xorg, but nothing you couldn't do without a little browsing on bugs.gentoo.org. Before this ATI card, I had NVIDIA. That was okay too, but for the current generation of graphics cards, ATI is quite simply the better player. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|