| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:44 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
you have a crash, that is another thing, post it at bugzilla of mesa
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wlchase
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 81
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have tried to get this set up for kernel 2.6.30-r5, and all the compiles went well except ati-drivers-9.8, which seemed to be pulled in by the xf86-ati-driver (?). It fails with:
| Code: | Building fgl_glxgears ...
In file included from fgl_glxgears.c:70:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.8/work/common/usr/include/GL/glATI.h:3744:1: warning: "GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/GL/gl.h:2074,
from /usr/include/GL/glu.h:38,
from fgl_glxgears.c:59:
/usr/include/GL/glext.h:7604:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*
* ERROR: x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.8 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 3469: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* "$(tc-getCC)" -o fgl_glxgears ${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS} -DUSE_GLU -I"${S}"/common/usr/include fgl_glxgears.c -lGL -lGLU -lX11 -lm || die "fgl_glxgears build failed";
* The die message:
* fgl_glxgears build failed |
I went ahead and loaded the drm & radeon modules and restarted the X server, but when I run
| Code: | | glxinfo | grep OpenGL |
I get
| Code: | | glxinfo: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
Ideas, more info needed?
TIA!
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wlchase wrote: | I have tried to get this set up for kernel 2.6.30-r5, and all the compiles went well except ati-drivers-9.8, which seemed to be pulled in by the xf86-ati-driver (?). It fails with:
| Code: | Building fgl_glxgears ...
In file included from fgl_glxgears.c:70:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.8/work/common/usr/include/GL/glATI.h:3744:1: warning: "GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/GL/gl.h:2074,
from /usr/include/GL/glu.h:38,
from fgl_glxgears.c:59:
/usr/include/GL/glext.h:7604:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
*
* ERROR: x11-drivers/ati-drivers-9.8 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_compile
* environment, line 3469: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* "$(tc-getCC)" -o fgl_glxgears ${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS} -DUSE_GLU -I"${S}"/common/usr/include fgl_glxgears.c -lGL -lGLU -lX11 -lm || die "fgl_glxgears build failed";
* The die message:
* fgl_glxgears build failed |
I went ahead and loaded the drm & radeon modules and restarted the X server, but when I run
| Code: | | glxinfo | grep OpenGL |
I get
| Code: | | glxinfo: error while loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory |
Ideas, more info needed?
TIA!
Bill |
dude, this is a ati opensource driver topic, not the closed source, please post this problem in the kernel forum as the 9.8 drivers are in the tree.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
redbottle
n00b
Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 25
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wlchase wrote: | I have tried to get this set up for kernel 2.6.30-r5, and all the compiles went well except ati-drivers-9.8, which seemed to be pulled in by the xf86-ati-driver (?). It fails with:
|
You definitely don't need ati-drivers, so you should try to figure out what's pulling that in and why. Other than that, use eselect to make sure your opengl provider is set to xorg-x11. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| redbottle wrote: | | wlchase wrote: | I have tried to get this set up for kernel 2.6.30-r5, and all the compiles went well except ati-drivers-9.8, which seemed to be pulled in by the xf86-ati-driver (?). It fails with:
|
You definitely don't need ati-drivers, so you should try to figure out what's pulling that in and why. Other than that, use eselect to make sure your opengl provider is set to xorg-x11. |
he should check his make.conf
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SnEptUne
l33t
Joined: 23 Aug 2004
Posts: 656
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The open source radeon driver from is very stable and 2D acceleration is working okay, but I still can't figure out what I get screen corruption on icons and mouse cursor. Setting Option "ExaNoUploadToScreen" "True" does fix it for me, but what does ExaUploadToScreen do?
I tried kernel-2.6.31-rc8 instead of drm-x11-9999, but some problem. And no 3D acceleration to boot. Does anyone have any luck getting 3D acceleration with vanilla-source?
_________________
"There will be more joy in heaven over the tear-bathed face of a repentant sinner than over the white robes of a hundred just men." (LM, 114) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wlchase
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 81
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DaggySyle wrote: | | dude, this is a ati opensource driver topic, not the closed source, please post this problem in the kernel forum as the 9.8 drivers are in the tree. |
Sorry, I didn't make that clear, I had installed the ATI drivers from AMD, but was wanting to switch to open source.
| DaggyStyle wrote: | | redbottle wrote: | | You definitely don't need ati-drivers, so you should try to figure out what's pulling that in and why. Other than that, use eselect to make sure your opengl provider is set to xorg-x11. |
he should check his make.conf |
That was the key, and why it was pulling in the proprietary drivers! And the change to the xorg-x11 OpenGL helped jog the brain of this semi-clueless n00b, too!
Now to restart Xorg!
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wlchase
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 04 Jul 2003
Posts: 81
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That, plus removing all traces of the settings for the proprietary driver in xorg.conf, was the trick!
I'm a happy camper!
Thanks, DaggyStyle, for the tip, and really, everyone, for being such a helpful forum!
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wlchase wrote: | That, plus removing all traces of the settings for the proprietary driver in xorg.conf, was the trick!
I'm a happy camper!
Thanks, DaggyStyle, for the tip, and really, everyone, for being such a helpful forum!
Bill |
np, sorry for not understanding your question
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pingufunkybeat
l33t
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 610
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
OpenArena works now, and almost all the corruption issues are fixed! w00t!
Nexuiz and Doom3 are still no-go because the shader support is still catching up, but you can play plenty of 3d games on r600+ using open drivers now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pingufunkybeat wrote: | OpenArena works now, and almost all the corruption issues are fixed! w00t!
Nexuiz and Doom3 are still no-go because the shader support is still catching up, but you can play plenty of 3d games on r600+ using open drivers now. |
flightgears not working well yet
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RealNC
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 13 Apr 2008
Posts: 148
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ozyrus
n00b
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello, I have a problem with this drivers. I emerged them via layman.
| Code: | | emerge =x11-drm-99999999 =mesa-9999 =libdrm-9999 =xf86-video-ati-9999 |
I disabled DRM in kernel because I have ATI 2600 Mobility (R630)
In make.conf I have VIDEO_CARDS="radeonhd radeon"
My xorg.conf:
| Code: | Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "X.org Configured"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
EndSection
Section "Files"
ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/OTF"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/"
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "dbe"
Load "dri2"
Load "dri"
Load "glx"
Load "record"
Load "extmod"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
#DisplaySize 330 210 # mm
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "SEC"
ModelName "3945"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Option "DRI" "true"
Option "AccelMethod" "EAX"
Option "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "radeon"
VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
BoardName "M76 [Radeon Mobility HD 2600 Series]"
BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Card0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 1
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 4
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 8
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 15
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 16
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Section "dri"
Mode 0666
EndSection
Section "Extensions"
Option "Composite" "On"
EndSection
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "AIGLX" "On"
EndSection |
glxinfo | grep OpenGL
| Code: | OpenGL vendor string: Mesa Project
OpenGL renderer string: Software Rasterizer
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.7-devel
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
OpenGL extensions: |
cat /proc/modules | grep radeon
| Code: | radeon 116088 0 - Live 0xf8429000
drm 68084 1 radeon, Live 0xf80ee000 |
Here's my xorg.conf
http://pastebin.com/m75cdd471 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mikkoc
Apprentice
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 231
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ozyrus
n00b
Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry I forgot to paste
in glxgears I have only
| Code: | 925 frames in 5.0 seconds = 184.967 FPS
1034 frames in 5.0 seconds = 206.572 FPS
991 frames in 5.0 seconds = 198.084 FPS
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 6111
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pingufunkybeat
l33t
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 610
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Has anyone tried the KMS+DRI2 setup on r600+? The support will be merged into 2.6.32.
So far, I've only been playing with DRI1, and while it has some slight artifacts and reproducible crashes (which are known to the developers), it's quite stable otherwise.
But the major goodies (OpenGL 2.0+, redirected direct rendering, powersaving etc.) will come with the transition to KMS+TTM+DRI2+Gallium3D. So I'm interested in migrating over once the performance and stability become comparable to the current "traditional" setup. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kingoftherings
Guru
Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 328
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pingufunkybeat wrote: | Has anyone tried the KMS+DRI2 setup on r600+? The support will be merged into 2.6.32.
So far, I've only been playing with DRI1, and while it has some slight artifacts and reproducible crashes (which are known to the developers), it's quite stable otherwise.
But the major goodies (OpenGL 2.0+, redirected direct rendering, powersaving etc.) will come with the transition to KMS+TTM+DRI2+Gallium3D. So I'm interested in migrating over once the performance and stability become comparable to the current "traditional" setup. |
I got KMS to work, so the high res framebuffer was there. But I got a black screen when X started. I still need to test to test the latest commits from the last ~24 hours. Turning off KMS at least lets me get into X and have working 3D. DRI2 only works with KMS doesn't it? So I would still be on DRI1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Watchman
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 5909
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ozyrus wrote: | Hello, I have a problem with this drivers. I emerged them via layman.
| Code: | | emerge =x11-drm-99999999 =mesa-9999 =libdrm-9999 =xf86-video-ati-9999 |
I disabled DRM in kernel because I have ATI 2600 Mobility (R630)
In make.conf I have VIDEO_CARDS="radeonhd radeon"
My xorg.conf:
| Code: | Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "X.org Configured"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
EndSection
Section "Files"
ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/OTF"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi/"
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi/"
EndSection
Section "Module"
Load "dbe"
Load "dri2"
Load "dri"
Load "glx"
Load "record"
Load "extmod"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
#DisplaySize 330 210 # mm
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "SEC"
ModelName "3945"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Option "DRI" "true"
Option "AccelMethod" "EAX"
Option "XAANoOffscreenPixmaps" "true"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "radeon"
VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
BoardName "M76 [Radeon Mobility HD 2600 Series]"
BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Card0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 1
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 4
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 8
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 15
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 16
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
SubSection "Display"
Viewport 0 0
Depth 24
Modes "1280x800" "1024x768" "1280x768" "1280x720" "1152x864"
EndSubSection
EndSection
Section "dri"
Mode 0666
EndSection
Section "Extensions"
Option "Composite" "On"
EndSection
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "AIGLX" "On"
EndSection |
glxinfo | grep OpenGL
| Code: | OpenGL vendor string: Mesa Project
OpenGL renderer string: Software Rasterizer
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.7-devel
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
OpenGL extensions: |
cat /proc/modules | grep radeon
| Code: | radeon 116088 0 - Live 0xf8429000
drm 68084 1 radeon, Live 0xf80ee000 |
Here's my xorg.conf
http://pastebin.com/m75cdd471 |
you are using software acceleration, if I'm not mistaken, the overlay ebuilds do not support the experimental 3d branch.
in order to get 3d hardware branch, you must use the ebuilds in this post
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wumpyr
n00b
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 70
Location: Downunder
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
the x11 overlay x11-drm-99999999 doesn't work with 2.6.31.
| Code: | CC [M] /ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_sysfs.o
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_memory.c: In function 'agp_remap':
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_memory.c:286: error: 'struct agp_memory' has no member named 'memory'
CC [M] /ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_pci.o
make[2]: *** [/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_memory.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_proc.c: In function 'drm__vma_info':
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_proc.c:589: warning: format '%08lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'phys_addr_t'
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_vm.c: In function 'drm_do_vm_fault':
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_vm.c:149: error: 'struct agp_memory' has no member named 'memory'
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_vm.c:153: error: 'struct agp_memory' has no member named 'memory'
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_vm.c: In function 'drm_vm_shm_close':
/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_vm.c:248: warning: enumeration value '_DRM_GEM' not handled in switch
make[2]: *** [/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core/drm_vm.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/ebuild/tmp/portage/x11-base/x11-drm-99999999/work/drm/linux-core] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.31-gentoo'
make: *** [modules] Error 2 |
is linux-core/x11-drm git even maintained?
is it safe to just use the 2.6.31 kernel drm? if not, why not? what's special about x11-drm git?
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joseph K.
Guru
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 436
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, from memory, the standard x11 overlay ebuild doesn't work, but if you modify it as described at the beginning of this thread, it will source from a repository that does work. The in-kernel drm works, but not for the purpose of this thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wumpyr
n00b
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 70
Location: Downunder
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok, so I patched the x11 overlay ebuilds and it now compiles. However still no luck, DRI is disabled. radeon and drm modules load fine but no workie. If I switch back to in kernel 2.6.31 drm DRI is fine.
what gives?
| Code: | (II) RADEON(0): ATOM BIOS Rom:
SubsystemVendorID: 0x1787 SubsystemID: 0x2281
IOBaseAddress: 0xa000
Filename: 96618BBD.QGH
BIOS Bootup Message:
RV790 GDDR5 1024MB 96618BBD.QGH
(II) RADEON(0): Framebuffer space used by Firmware (kb): 20
(II) RADEON(0): Start of VRAM area used by Firmware: 0xfffec
(II) RADEON(0): AtomBIOS requests 20kB of VRAM scratch space
(II) RADEON(0): AtomBIOS VRAM scratch base: 0xfffec
(II) RADEON(0): Cannot get VRAM scratch space. Allocating in main memory instead
(II) RADEON(0): Default Engine Clock: 850000
(II) RADEON(0): Default Memory Clock: 975000
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Output: 1200000
(II) RADEON(0): Minimum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Output: 0
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Input: 16000
(II) RADEON(0): Minimum Pixel ClockPLL Frequency Input: 6000
(II) RADEON(0): Maximum Pixel Clock: 400000
(II) RADEON(0): Reference Clock: 100000
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci:0000:02:00.0
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -19
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card1
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns -19
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card2
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
[snip]
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card14
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
[dri] Disabling DRI. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joseph K.
Guru
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 436
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| To start with, what card do you have and what is the output of glxinfo|grep ": "? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
