Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Upgrading hardware, checking performance increase
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
odegard
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 324
Location: Trondheim, NO

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:21 am    Post subject: Upgrading hardware, checking performance increase Reply with quote

After several years I've finally decided to do a major upgrade. What I want to check is the general performance improvement. I'm not after specifically target CPU performance, or HD performance.

This is my current system:
Athlon XP 2000+ (~1666MHz)
512MB RAM
Geforce4 ti4200 128MB RAM
ECS 745 Ultra mainboard
Seagate Barracuda 7100(?) drive 120gb, 8mb cache, 7200 RPM (I guess the platter density is 60gb per platter)

This is my new system:
Core 2 Duo E6300 (~1800MHz)
2GB RAM
Geforce 7300 GT 512MB RAM, Fanless (Imagine that, as much ram as my system has now... and fanless!)
Asus P5B mainboard
P120 Spinpoint 250gb, 8mb cache, 7200 RPM (platter density is 125gb per platter)

I use inkscape alot, and handling large drawings bogs down the system considerably, I'm sure I'll notice a huge difference. But, how can I quantify the performance increase?

There's not only the hardware, I'll use more updated software as well.

Current software:
GCC 3.3.5
Kernel 2.6.7-gentoo-r8

New software:
GCC 4.1.1
Kernel 2.6.18-somerelease

what else (software) might impact performance in general? I will of course use different USE flags and optimizations. Now I use -Os, I plan to use -O2. Now I'm using x86, I plan to try AMD64. As I said in the beginning, I don't plan to make an apples-to-apples comparison since there are too many variables involved (hardware, software versions, optimizations and whatnot).

Alright, the obvious benchmark is to compile something big, like inkscape.
I guess hdparm -tT /dev/... will be interesting
Also I'll try mencoder

I won't play any games so I don't care about frames per second in Quake.

what else can I do... Bogomips?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrUlterior
Guru
Guru


Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 511
Location: Switzerland

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Things you can measure:

- kernel compile (same kernel version, same .config)
- sustained write to disk: dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/file bs=1024k count=10240
- boot time (to login:)
- X start up time
- "emerge -e system" from bare stage3 time

Kind of a shame you're going to be running on a single HDD though, IO is going to be your bottleneck. Why not invest in 2 x SATA on RAID1 and put a striped LVM ontop of it?

Also don't forget to change your -J options to reflect 2 cores in your /etc/make.conf[/url]
_________________

Misanthropy 2.0 - enough hate to go around
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
odegard
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 324
Location: Trondheim, NO

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the suggestions. I plan to expand my I/O subsystem further, but I have to upgrade in stages.

I also plan to get:
150gb 16mb raptor to use as system disk, but right now I need more space
zalman reserator (fanless watercooling)
another P120 spinpoint disk and test raid, never done that before
new loudspeakers, possibly a separate soundcard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkeh
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 1656
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Upgrading hardware, checking performance increase Reply with quote

odegard wrote:
Geforce 7300 GT 512MB RAM, Fanless (Imagine that, as much ram as my system has now... and fanless!)


It doesn't have anywhere near 512MB on it. It sucks off your system RAM. And they seem to be pretty much useless under linux..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
odegard
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 324
Location: Trondheim, NO

PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 1:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nope. It has 512mb onboard. This is not a hypercache card.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkeh
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 1656
Location: England

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

odegard wrote:
Nope. It has 512mb onboard. This is not a hypercache card.


I have never, ever heard of a 7300GT with 512MB of RAM onboard. And the card is nowhere near fast enough to need that anyway. I have a 7800GT, and it's not that fast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
odegard
Guru
Guru


Joined: 08 Mar 2003
Posts: 324
Location: Trondheim, NO

PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.pointofview-online.com/GF7300GT512pci.html

I don't care if it's needed or not, the 256mb variant is only a bit cheaper.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum