| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| How long between emerge -uD @system? |
| ~6 months or less |
|
86% |
[ 58 ] |
| ~9 months |
|
4% |
[ 3 ] |
| ~12 months |
|
2% |
[ 2 ] |
| ~18 months |
|
1% |
[ 1 ] |
| ~2 years |
|
1% |
[ 1 ] |
| More than ~2 years |
|
2% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 67 |
|
| Author |
Message |
yngwin Developer


Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4219 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jonnevers wrote: | a poll where the lowest update interval is ~6months is nonsensical. i mean ~1 week would be a LONG time, reasonable but still a long time |
I agree. For Gentoo the "rolling release" system is essential. I always recommend users to do a full update at least once a month. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonnevers Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 1584 Location: Gentoo64 land
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AllenJB wrote: | | Your update command is what's really nonsensical (Why are you one-shotting updates? Why are you asking for emerge to be both verbose and quiet?) |
the -1 is to keep @system packages out of @world. perhaps its no longer the case but at the introduction of the @sets, @system packages would move over to @world, rendering the division useless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Akkara Administrator


Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 3715 Location: &akkara
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
My updates are always with emerge -uaD world. They happen on average every two weeks. More often if there's something interesting going on, and less often during quiet times.
Sometimes, if there's *a lot* of updates, I'll update -uaD1 specific important packages first (such as emerge -uaD1 gcc) so I'm never too far from a consistent system in case something comes up and I need to use the computer, or power off. Then I'll finish with -uaD world, and then revdep-rebuild. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Etal Veteran


Joined: 15 Jul 2005 Posts: 1580
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yabbadabbadont wrote: | | AM088 wrote: | | I update several times a day. As others said, it's easier to isolate problems that way. |
If it is on the same machine, then it should get you added to the rsync ban list... |
My bad, I meant week
I don't update every day  _________________ “And even in authoritarian countries, information networks are helping people discover new facts and making governments more accountable.”– Hillary Clinton, Jan. 21, 2010 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tadeas Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 19 Sep 2008 Posts: 113 Location: Prague
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Almost every day lately, mainly because I use KDE 4 and thus every upgrade is a step further to a more stable and usable system. But otherwise I'd do it about once a week, because it's difficult to manage many big updates - it's like reinstalling. I can imagine doing an upgrade every say 6 months if I was using say stable Debian but with Gentoo it's imo better to do it more often... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
monsm Guru


Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 449 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jonnevers wrote: | | AllenJB wrote: | | Your update command is what's really nonsensical (Why are you one-shotting updates? Why are you asking for emerge to be both verbose and quiet?) |
the -1 is to keep @system packages out of @world. perhaps its no longer the case but at the introduction of the @sets, @system packages would move over to @world, rendering the division useless. |
By default, 'system' is a subset of 'world'. isn't that right? It's not meaningless then is it. If you just want to update the main packages, run with 'system'. If you want to update all, use 'world'. Would you actually ever update 'world' without first making sure system packages are up to date or being updated at the same time? I would have though not, hence its just as well having system packages both in 'system' and 'world'.
One more thing. I might have missed some change here. Is it a difference between system and @system (i.e. "emerge -DNuv system" and "emerge -DNuv @system")?
Mons
PS! I run emerge -DNuv world every 2-3 weeks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonnevers Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 1584 Location: Gentoo64 land
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| monsm wrote: | | Would you actually ever update 'world' without first making sure system packages are up to date or being updated at the same time? | Yes? I personally don't but I can certainly understand the use case for not wanting to update @system when updating @world.
| monsm wrote: |
One more thing. I might have missed some change here. Is it a difference between system and @system (i.e. "emerge -DNuv system" and "emerge -DNuv @system")? |
@system is the new portage set feature version of the old 'system' keyword. afaik, they are logically equivalent.
i found this mailing list post: http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg30108.html
this only applies if you are using portage 2.2+... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poly_poly-man Advocate


Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 2477 Location: RIT, NY, US
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure @system is in @world...
I think it is for me, at least... _________________ iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAA
avatar: new version of logo - see topic 838248. Potentially still a WiP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonnevers Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 1584 Location: Gentoo64 land
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| poly_poly-man wrote: | I'm pretty sure @system is in @world...
I think it is for me, at least... |
because its defined that way or because you never did a -1 on @system and things were just put into @world? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mv Advocate


Joined: 20 Apr 2005 Posts: 2590
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The new portage-2.2 ebuilds put @system into the world_sets during the first upgrade to portage-2.2.
Of course, you can manually remove it. Moreover, you can use | /etc/portage/sets.conf wrote: | [system]
world-candidate = False | so that "-1" is henceforth automagic for @system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poly_poly-man Advocate


Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 2477 Location: RIT, NY, US
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely like this behavior... just commenting on it. _________________ iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAA
avatar: new version of logo - see topic 838248. Potentially still a WiP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|