| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Krog
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Roma, Italy
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
gambas build with -qt3
and xt7-player failed with this message: configure: error: Failed to find gb.qt component ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kokoko3k
n00b
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 72
|
| Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a new version available on kde-apps.
It uses gambas3 + qt4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keenblade
Veteran
Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1038
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krog
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Roma, Italy
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| what is the problem for a gambas 3 ebuild? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keenblade
Veteran
Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1038
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Krog wrote: | | what is the problem for a gambas 3 ebuild? |
There isn't an ebuild for gambas-3. There are ebuilds for just gambas-2. At least I could not find gambas-3 that is needed for latest xt7.
_________________
Anyway it's all the same at the end...
Need help to get it working: "x-fi surround 5.1" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krog
Apprentice
Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 251
Location: Roma, Italy
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes i know there is not a gambas3 ebuild, i searched it... my question is why it doesn't exists... i don't know how to do it, so i can't make it... but really anyone can't make an ebuild for it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keenblade
Veteran
Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1038
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Krog wrote: | | yes i know there is not a gambas3 ebuild, i searched it... my question is why it doesn't exists... i don't know how to do it, so i can't make it... but really anyone can't make an ebuild for it? |
I think not many people is interested in development environment based on a Basic interpreter in linux.
Anyway, I tried to do a live (9999) ebuild for gambas-3 from the existing ebuilds ,but it fails with:
| Code: |
* Running elibtoolize in: gambas3-9999/gb.xml/
grep: /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/gambas-9999/work/gambas3-9999/gb.xml/ltmain.sh: No such file or directory
* Portage patch failed to apply (ltmain.sh version 0)!
* Please file a bug report to add a proper patch.
* ERROR: dev-util/gambas-9999 failed (prepare phase):
* Portage patch failed to apply!
|
I don't know what patch portage fails to apply, since the message is not clear to me.
I'll post it at g.b.o., if I managed to make it work.
_________________
Anyway it's all the same at the end...
Need help to get it working: "x-fi surround 5.1" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
acidrums4
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Feb 2009
Posts: 85
Location: Al otro lado del monitor
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So we will never have a xt7-player ebuild...? I don't get it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Maitreya
n00b
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh come on this is the linux community. What happened to fiddling/testing until it works yourself?
Its Gentoo; "THE" developers linux.
Im a real noob at this. I looked at the screenshots and thought "Well thats a nice player". Saw there was no ebuild. Downloaded Gambas 3. Got its dependancies. Configured it . Compiled it. Installed it and it looks beautifull.
All this by an incredible noob (me).
So how can it be that the complainers didnt even try? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
acidrums4
Tux's lil' helper
Joined: 05 Feb 2009
Posts: 85
Location: Al otro lado del monitor
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's not the point. Or maybe it would be if it were a recent app. It's been years since this post had opened and there's no ebuid neither in a overlay. Neither for gambas. This is not a small deal.
I don't want to install an infinity of packages by myself just for one media player and doing its maintenance an absolutely crap. Portage should do that for users, even for experienced ones. Otherwise we would be using LFS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Unsupported Software
