| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tomas.pulai
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 195
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 12:21 pm Post subject: openoffice 3 emerge failed |
 |
|
| Code: |
* Failed Running aclocal !
*
* Include in your bugreport the contents of:
*
* /var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/aclocal-4901.out
*
* ERROR: app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 49: Called src_unpack
* environment, line 5499: Called eautoreconf
* environment, line 1644: Called eaclocal
* environment, line 1494: Called autotools_run_tool 'src_unpack'
* environment, line 632: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* die "Failed Running $1 !";
* The die message:
* Failed Running aclocal !
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
* A complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/app-office/openoffice-3.0.0/temp/environment'.
*
|
some solution for me? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alexbuell
Guru
Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 490
Location: "Hemp"shire, UK
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Openoffice 3.0 is building quite happily on two of my boxes right now. Did you upgrade to all the latest stable versions required for building OpenOffice?
_________________
Cheers,
Alex.
Linux - the best text adventure game ever. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomas.pulai
Apprentice
Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 195
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i thin yes...i use only stable packages (keyword = x86)..so i think yes
| alexbuell wrote: | | Openoffice 3.0 is building quite happily on two of my boxes right now. Did you upgrade to all the latest stable versions required for building OpenOffice? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Offler
n00b
Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Posts: 58
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm getting the same problems. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pizzach
Apprentice
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 195
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| For me to get Openoffice.org to compile, I had to set in make.conf. With "-j2" the compile failed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RemcoNL
Apprentice
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Posts: 178
Location: Leiden, The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pizzach wrote: | | For me to get Openoffice.org to compile, I had to set in make.conf. With "-j2" the compile failed. |
I have just compiled OpenOffice 3 with `MAKEOPTS="-j3"` (AMD 64 dualcore), and was happily surprised that OpenOffice now uses multithreaded compiling instead of just one thread! I remember OOo2 taking 8 hours, now it was finished withing 5 
So the -j2 option shouldn't be the problem.
_________________
Use Compact Flash cards as a silent IDE hard drive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Can you post your emerge --info plz ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
transpetaflops
Apprentice
Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you have /tmp and var/tmp on tmpfs make sure to increase the number of inodes. The 512K default on my 2GB AMD64 was obviously not enough. Compilation stopped every time when /tmp was 3.5GB full. Recompiling with /tmp mounted on harddrive right now so I can't say how many inodes are necessary. Does anyone know of a way to tell how many temporary files compiling of openoffice creates at maximum? I'm at 333000+ atm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Desktop Environments
