| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DaggyStyle
Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 3798
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:55 am Post subject: strange error generated upon update [solved] |
 |
|
here is the code
| Code: | Calculating world dependencies /
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-java/bsf-2.4.0-r1:2.3[python?,javascript?,tcl?]".
(dependency required by "dev-java/ant-apache-bsf-1.7.1" [installed])
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for dev-java/ant
!!! Depgraph creation failed. |
some output:
| Code: |
[I] dev-java/ant-apache-bsf
Available versions: 1.7.0-r1 (~)1.7.1 {elibc_FreeBSD javascript python tcl}
Installed versions: 1.7.1(01:14:28 PM 09/19/2008)(-elibc_FreeBSD)
Homepage: http://ant.apache.org/
Description: Apache Ant's optional tasks depending on bsf-2.3
[I] dev-java/bsf
Available versions: (2.3) 2.4.0-r1
{doc elibc_FreeBSD examples javascript python source tcl}
Installed versions: 2.4.0-r1(2.3)(01:04:35 PM 09/28/2008)(javascript python -doc -elibc_FreeBSD -examples -source -tcl)
Homepage: http://jakarta.apache.org/bsf/
Description
|
I see that ant-apache-bsf has a possibility for python and javascript flags but seems that not in this version... how can I solve it?
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM
Last edited by DaggyStyle on Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Genone
Retired Dev
Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 8657
Location: beyond the rim
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Something is odd there, if you look close enough you'll see that there is no description printed for bsf, but the ebuild in the tree definitely has a description. Only thing I could think of would be to rebuild bsf with USE=tcl enabled (though you should have seen a different error message if that's the problem). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 3798
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've rsynced my tree again, there is a description now, more upgrades have emerged (previous sync was 9 hours ago) the problem still persists.
will try to enable tcl support
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 3798
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tried that, didnt worked.
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 3798
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
more info ran emerge --depclean --verbose and got this:
| Code: | Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
the following required packages not being installed:
>=dev-java/bsf-2.4.0-r1:2.3[python?,javascript?,tcl?] required by dev-java/ant-apache-bsf-1.7.1
>=dev-java/antlr-2.7.5-r3:0[java] required by dev-java/ant-antlr-1.7.1
|
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zmedico
Developer
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 242
Location: California USA
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I seems that the EAPI got bumped without a revision bump:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-java/ant-apache-bsf/ant-apache-bsf-1.7.1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
In order to solve this, you should either upgrade to >=sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc11 or else downgrade to a lower version of ant-apache-bsf that uses an EAPI which is supported by your currently installed version of sys-apps/portage. Run `emerge --version` to find out which version of sys-apps/portage you currently have installed.
_________________
Zac |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaggyStyle
Advocate
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 3798
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I run the latest stable version, downgrading ant-apache-bsf means downgrading ant, too much of a hassle, not worth it.
I guess going rc22 is the only way to go...
question, how an issue like that can happen? this means that ant 1.7.1 will go stable only when portage 2.2 will go stable, right?
_________________
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein
OSSM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zmedico
Developer
Joined: 02 Jan 2004
Posts: 242
Location: California USA
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DaggyStyle wrote: | I run the latest stable version, downgrading ant-apache-bsf means downgrading ant, too much of a hassle, not worth it.
I guess going rc22 is the only way to go...
|
Apparently, yes.
| DaggyStyle wrote: |
question, how an issue like that can happen? this means that ant 1.7.1 will go stable only when portage 2.2 will go stable, right? |
Right. As long as the java team decides to use EAPI 2, it can't go stable until portage 2.2 goes stable (likely to happen within ~2 months).
_________________
Zac |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Portage & Programming
