Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Google Chromium for Gentoo
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14  Next  
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hallabro wrote:
Anyone managed to build latest trunk without pulling in gnome-keyring? :?


I think that phajdan.jr changed things so that the keyring is only used during the build, as it is a compile time dependency, not a runtime dependency. Why I do not know.

On another topic, it seems that Google is writing their own PDF reader:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/199349/Google_Chrome.html

This will resolve the existing PDF issues if Google can produce a PDF reader better than Adobe's:

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13716

By better than Adobe's, I mean that it will be compatible with all existing PDFs that lack malicious content and it will break anything that attempts to do something strange (i.e. exploit an adobe flaw) without introducing its own security issues. Is there any chance that there could be a use flag implemented in the Chromium ebuild to enable this PDF reader, or is this a Chrome-exclusive feature?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kingoftherings
Guru
Guru


Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 328

PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shining Arcanine wrote:
hallabro wrote:
Anyone managed to build latest trunk without pulling in gnome-keyring? :?


I think that phajdan.jr changed things so that the keyring is only used during the build, as it is a compile time dependency, not a runtime dependency. Why I do not know.

On another topic, it seems that Google is writing their own PDF reader:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/199349/Google_Chrome.html

This will resolve the existing PDF issues if Google can produce a PDF reader better than Adobe's:

http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13716

By better than Adobe's, I mean that it will be compatible with all existing PDFs that lack malicious content and it will break anything that attempts to do something strange (i.e. exploit an adobe flaw) without introducing its own security issues. Is there any chance that there could be a use flag implemented in the Chromium ebuild to enable this PDF reader, or is this a Chrome-exclusive feature?


As if Chrome's source download size needed to get bigger and the compile time even longer.
The PDF viewer is really something I don't care about. I use Okular, and there are dozens of other PDF viewers for Linux.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shining Arcanine wrote:
Is there any chance that there could be a use flag implemented in the Chromium ebuild to enable this PDF reader, or is this a Chrome-exclusive feature?


See http://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/de27ae70ecf99d74#.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110

PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kingoftherings wrote:
As if Chrome's source download size needed to get bigger and the compile time even longer.
The PDF viewer is really something I don't care about. I use Okular, and there are dozens of other PDF viewers for Linux.


Have you tried viewing PDFs in Chromium on Linux and doing the same in Chrome on Windows? On Linux, it will download them. On Windows, it displays them inline like webpages. There is a big difference and that is true no matter what PDF viewer you use for Linux.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CkoTuHa
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 68

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

GCC 4.5.0 f*cking omnibox !

here, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=41887
they say it works if you add -fno-ipa-cp to your CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS. There are even faggots that say - "works for me" using ~x86_64 gentoo.

But it stopped working for me a long time now & it sucks as I got used to chromium. everytime I need to google now I have to go to google.com ( it loads igoogle.com with tonns of images ) and from there I can google. Wtf ? can anyone explain to me, how to get by, as those idiots claim "allright" ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CkoTuHa wrote:
GCC 4.5.0 f*cking omnibox !

here, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=41887
they say it works if you add -fno-ipa-cp to your CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS. There are even faggots that say - "works for me" using ~x86_64 gentoo.

But it stopped working for me a long time now & it sucks as I got used to chromium. everytime I need to google now I have to go to google.com ( it loads igoogle.com with tonns of images ) and from there I can google. Wtf ? can anyone explain to me, how to get by, as those idiots claim "allright" ?


Maybe you should ask those idiots for their emerge chromium --info.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5522
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CkoTuHa wrote:
GCC 4.5.0 f*cking omnibox !

here, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=41887
they say it works if you add -fno-ipa-cp to your CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS. There are even faggots that say - "works for me" using ~x86_64 gentoo.

But it stopped working for me a long time now & it sucks as I got used to chromium. everytime I need to google now I have to go to google.com ( it loads igoogle.com with tonns of images ) and from there I can google. Wtf ? can anyone explain to me, how to get by, as those idiots claim "allright" ?


thanks !

so that's the culprit flag ?

*compile baby - compile !*

edit:

indeed !

now that bar works again :)

(saves me some key strokes *g* )
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CkoTuHa
n00b
n00b


Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 68

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelOfTruth,

Do I understand correctly that your omnibar works. Here, I guess, I need to make some assumptions and I ask you to confirm or deny the truthfulness of my assumptions.

assumption 1 : Omnibar, is a feature in chrome(chromium) where it dynamically gives suggestions as you type in address bar.
assumption 2 : the other feature is, as you type in address bar something like 'youtu' and hit tab it gives you an option to search for an input string through youtube
assumption 3 : you have added -fno-ipa-cp to CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS to your /etc/make.conf recompiled chromium and you have working omnibar with features mentioned in assumption 1 & 2 working.
assumption 4 : you have populated default search engine in Options - Basics - Default Search in chromium. ( I have those blank after merging chromium & the omnibar lacks features I mentioned )
assumption 5 : you are using GCC 4.5.0, from portage, sys-devel/gcc-4.5.0


let me know, as I think I got it right from you prev post where you are saying that you have all these working after adding -fno-ipa-cp to flags.

ak
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kernelOfTruth
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005
Posts: 5522
Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)

PostPosted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CkoTuHa wrote:
kernelOfTruth,

Do I understand correctly that your omnibar works. Here, I guess, I need to make some assumptions and I ask you to confirm or deny the truthfulness of my assumptions.

assumption 1 : Omnibar, is a feature in chrome(chromium) where it dynamically gives suggestions as you type in address bar.
assumption 2 : the other feature is, as you type in address bar something like 'youtu' and hit tab it gives you an option to search for an input string through youtube
assumption 3 : you have added -fno-ipa-cp to CFLAGS & CXXFLAGS to your /etc/make.conf recompiled chromium and you have working omnibar with features mentioned in assumption 1 & 2 working.
assumption 4 : you have populated default search engine in Options - Basics - Default Search in chromium. ( I have those blank after merging chromium & the omnibar lacks features I mentioned )
assumption 5 : you are using GCC 4.5.0, from portage, sys-devel/gcc-4.5.0


let me know, as I think I got it right from you prev post where you are saying that you have all these working after adding -fno-ipa-cp to flags.

ak


Hi CkoTuHa / ak,

sorry for the delay:

meanwhile I found some time to test the omnibar and can confirm that
assumption 1 and assumption 2 are == true :wink:
(directly entering search terms to google and/or youtube works)

default search for me is google

gcc is:
Quote:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.5.0/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.5.0/work/gcc-4.5.0/configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.5.0 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0 --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/man --infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/include/g++-v4 --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --with-ppl --with-cloog --enable-lto --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-checking --disable-werror --enable-secureplt --enable-multilib --enable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-esp --enable-libgomp --enable-cld --with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/python --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-objc-gc --enable-languages=c,c++,java,objc,obj-c++,fortran --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --with-bugurl=http://bugs.gentoo.org/ --with-pkgversion='Gentoo Hardened 4.5.0 p1.2, pie-0.4.5'
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 (Gentoo Hardened 4.5.0 p1.2, pie-0.4.5)


(the one from in-tree but with enabled hardened)
_________________
Unofficial minimal livecd x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt (by Neo2)
2.6.37.2_plus_v1: BFS, CFS,THP,compaction, zcache or TOI
Hardcore Linux user since 2004 :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Desti²
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 06 Sep 2003
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I updated my chromium to the latest chromium 6 ebuild an now the --enable-webgl switch seems no longer working and webgl seems to be allways disabled? What has changed there?
_________________
Linux Users Everywhere @ climateprediction.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shining Arcanine
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 1110

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Desti² wrote:
Hi,

I updated my chromium to the latest chromium 6 ebuild an now the --enable-webgl switch seems no longer working and webgl seems to be allways disabled? What has changed there?


You should file a bug report at the Gentoo bug tracker for that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bapabooiee
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Desti² wrote:
I updated my chromium to the latest chromium 6 ebuild an now the --enable-webgl switch seems no longer working and webgl seems to be allways disabled? What has changed there?

Well, you are are using a development build of Chromium. There are no guarantees that everything'll always work, and things will break from time-to-time.

That said, it could still be an ebuild-related issue, but I think it's far more likely that the problems originates from upstream. I'd recommend waiting for a new version to be released and see if the problem persists. If it does, I'd highly encourage you to report this as a regression in Chromium's official bug tracker.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bapabooiee wrote:
That said, it could still be an ebuild-related issue, but I think it's far more likely that the problems originates from upstream. I'd recommend waiting for a new version to be released and see if the problem persists. If it does, I'd highly encourage you to report this as a regression in Chromium's official bug tracker.


If you're not sure it's best to report it to Gentoo first. If applicable, you'll be told to report upstream. The benefit is that I'm also an upstream developer, so I can pre-triage upstream bugs that I can see, so they get to their owners faster.

And sometimes it's indeed an ebuild issue.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
darkphader
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 09 May 2002
Posts: 1087
Location: Motown

PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:22 pm    Post subject: -fno-ipa-cp Reply with quote

Adding the -fno-ipa-cp flag works for me here.

Tried the latest chromium-6.0.472.0 without using -fno-ipa-cp and the omnibar was borked. Just compiled chromium-6.0.472.0 using this ebuild diff (I'm not running hardened):
Code:
64c64
<    epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-disable-vp8-r1.patch
---
>    #epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-disable-vp8-r1.patch
116c116
<    myconf="${myconf} -Dv8_use_snapshot=0"
---
>    myconf="${myconf} -Dv8_use_snapshot=1"
145a146,149
>    fi
>
>    if [[ "$(gcc-major-version)$(gcc-minor-version)" == "45" ]]; then
>       append-flags -fno-ipa-cp
It automatially adds -fno-ipa-cp if you're using gcc-4.5. Decided to try to enable vp8 and v8 as well. Seems quicker...we'll see how it holds up :)
_________________
What I need is an exact list of specific unknown problems we might encounter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seqizz
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 96
Location: seqizz.net

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:05 pm    Post subject: :\ Reply with quote

is there any chance, can i get the buttons (close, max, min) to the left side under kde (without system borders, like this: http://goo.gl/CSyQ )? I don't have a problem with gtk themes, thanks to qtcurve (but systemsettings still says "i can't find gtk-qt theme engine, you cant use your qt theme in gtk applications"). Maybe cause of this, i'm using left-side buttons on kwin, but chromium stays at right. Is there a configuration option or something to force chromium?
_________________
what about an answer here?
Turkish Gentoo-Wiki admin..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:24 pm    Post subject: Re: :\ Reply with quote

seqizz wrote:
is there any chance, can i get the buttons (close, max, min) to the left side under kde (without system borders, like this: http://goo.gl/CSyQ )? I don't have a problem with gtk themes, thanks to qtcurve (but systemsettings still says "i can't find gtk-qt theme engine, you cant use your qt theme in gtk applications"). Maybe cause of this, i'm using left-side buttons on kwin, but chromium stays at right. Is there a configuration option or something to force chromium?


I think you can file an upstream bug at http://new.crbug.com. Please post the link here then, so I can route it to the Linux UI people. It can display buttons on the left on GNOME, so it should also be able on KDE. By the way, which version of the browser is it? Did you try the most recent one?
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seqizz
Tux's lil' helper
Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 96
Location: seqizz.net

PostPosted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:12 pm    Post subject: :\ Reply with quote

it's chromium-6.0.472.0 . ok, i'll file a bug there. thanks.

//edit: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=50069
_________________
what about an answer here?
Turkish Gentoo-Wiki admin..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kingoftherings
Guru
Guru


Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 328

PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone else noticing insane memory usage in Chromium 6.0.x?
I haven't checked any previous releases, but right now with 9 tabs open, Chromium is chewing up a whopping 370mb of RAM.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you'd like to contribute to Gentoo and make the Chromium packages better, please read my blog post: http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/2010/08/help-gentoo-make-www-clientchromium-and.html. If you prefer, just visit the project page directly: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/chromium/index.xml.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lucapost
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Posts: 1411
Location: <ud|me|ts> - Italy

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a problem with chromium stable on amd64. After all startup chrmoium lost authenticated sessions. Please help me.
_________________
LP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lucapost wrote:
I have a problem with chromium stable on amd64. After all startup chrmoium lost authenticated sessions. Please help me.


Please report a bug.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmpogo
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 2166
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find I am using back the Firefox more and more. Deal breaker for me seems to be how Chroimuim handles downloads/external applications.
I prefer when downloaded files are kept in tmp directory, if I download a file twice, a browser is smart not to do anything, and can be loaded into an application of my choice. I like my dowloaded PDF's in okular, not acroread, not acroread plugin, not Chromium internal viewer.

How is Chromium 6 in this regard ?


Last edited by dmpogo on Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmpogo wrote:
How is Chromium 6 in this regard ?


I'm afraid it's mostly the same. But I'm working on cleaning up the download code, which will hopefully make possible some further, user-visible improvements.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ant P.
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 1992
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a heads-up to save people a few hours compiling: 6.0.472.22/6.0.472.25 seem to be really broken. Menu bar is all messed up and Youtube crashes the whole tab. 6.0.472.14 works OK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phajdan.jr
Developer
Developer


Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Posts: 1742
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ant_P wrote:
Just a heads-up to save people a few hours compiling: 6.0.472.22/6.0.472.25 seem to be really broken. Menu bar is all messed up and Youtube crashes the whole tab.


Hey, they are hard masked. They are expected to be broken. :wink: By the way, have you reported the YouTube problem to Gentoo Bugzilla? Any chance for a stacktrace of the crashed tab?

Ant_P wrote:
6.0.472.14 works OK.


That's why I left it in the tree. :D However, if you're brave, please help testing the most recent version. The dev channel gets to beta at some point, and then to stable. The sooner we can detect and fix the problems, the better.
_________________
http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Other Things Gentoo All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 12 of 14

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum