Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Kernel: Options not accurated on gentoo-sources [SOLVED]
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ZeuZ_NG
Guru
Guru


Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Posts: 350
Location: Near /dev/urandom | /dev/null

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:46 pm    Post subject: Kernel: Options not accurated on gentoo-sources [SOLVED] Reply with quote

Hi, well, so pretty much my tittle says it everything, my kernel options are not what are shown in the vanilla kernel, not even the vanilla kernel has the options it should (tested with the same sources in two hosts running gentoo, the troublesome is my laptop)
For example, I cant see ACPI - VIDEO, actually, if I try to go to 2.6.24.X I just cant see ACPI at all, just APM
Along other tons of things like general menu only having 7 or 8 items.
I´ve tried make clean before make menuconfig, having not done make oldconfig and having deleted the .config for it, my actual compiled kernel is 2.6.26.3 and it works awesomely, but as it deals badly with ACPI events and I need it for my laptop, I was told it was a better shot to downgrade, since the last known version to work error-less with my hardware was 2.6.24.7.
Any idea what can I try to do?
Any help is appreciated.


Last edited by ZeuZ_NG on Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BradN
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 19 Apr 2002
Posts: 2270
Location: Wisconsin (USA)

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

try rm .config and then make menuconfig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZeuZ_NG
Guru
Guru


Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Posts: 350
Location: Near /dev/urandom | /dev/null

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BradN wrote:
try rm .config and then make menuconfig


As stated before, I did that allready, didn´t work.
Any further ideas?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyrillic
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 7301
Location: Groton, Massachusetts USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you are having trouble finding certain kernel options, you could start with a fully populated .config, and then work your way backwards by removing the options you don't need.
Code:
# make allmodconfig
# make menuconfig

If you want to start with a clean slate, and work your way up, then try this.
Code:
# make allnoconfig
# make menuconfig

Starting with the default configuration is probably the easiest, because many of the popular options are already selected.
Code:
# make defconfig
# make menuconfig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZeuZ_NG
Guru
Guru


Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Posts: 350
Location: Near /dev/urandom | /dev/null

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cyrillic wrote:
If you are having trouble finding certain kernel options, you could start with a fully populated .config, and then work your way backwards by removing the options you don't need.
Code:
# make allmodconfig
# make menuconfig

If you want to start with a clean slate, and work your way up, then try this.
Code:
# make allnoconfig
# make menuconfig

Starting with the default configuration is probably the easiest, because many of the popular options are already selected.
Code:
# make defconfig
# make menuconfig


Lovely, thanks, that's what I was after.
Nevertheless, I wanted to inform that I located the trouble with the use of dtrace (and a friend who was the one lurking :P)
Seems like apparently, kernels where catting /proc/config.gz to retrieve the information, but where not parsing it properly.

NOTE TO MODS: Since it has been solved, could someone please tag it as such?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paapaa
l33t
l33t


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 955
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZeuZ_NG wrote:
NOTE TO MODS: Since it has been solved, could someone please tag it as such?


You can do it yourself by editing the first post and adding [SOLVED] to the title.
_________________
Paludis, the way packages are meant to be managed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ZeuZ_NG
Guru
Guru


Joined: 10 Sep 2008
Posts: 350
Location: Near /dev/urandom | /dev/null

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paapaa wrote:
ZeuZ_NG wrote:
NOTE TO MODS: Since it has been solved, could someone please tag it as such?


You can do it yourself by editing the first post and adding [SOLVED] to the title.


Oops, thanks, done.
Shall I now request this thread to be locked? so it doesn't get bumped in the future?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paapaa
l33t
l33t


Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Posts: 955
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZeuZ_NG wrote:
Shall I now request this thread to be locked? so it doesn't get bumped in the future?


No, just leave it like this. You might need to return to this later or someone else might have some more suggestions, comments, ideas, similar issues etc. So all is fine for now :)
_________________
Paludis, the way packages are meant to be managed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Kernel & Hardware All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum