Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
lilo graphics
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

 
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 636

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:29 am    Post subject: lilo graphics Reply with quote

i'm looking for better resolution and more colors on my splash screen(currently using grub). does lilo do it better?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poly_poly-man
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Posts: 2477
Location: RIT, NY, US

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nope - worse, in fact...

what's wrong with grub? does xpm's at least... limited to 640x480, but what isn't?

srsly... how often do you boot anyway? :D

poly-p man
_________________
iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAA

avatar: new version of logo - see topic 838248. Potentially still a WiP.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shiney
n00b
n00b


Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 14
Location: Layton, Utah USA

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had the same thoughts a couple of years ago. I am fine with the resolution, but the color depth can make some of the best splash screens look downright horrid. After doing some soul searching I found the best action was to quit using that other OS and set the grub timeout to 0 bypassing it completley. Now the only time I look at that menu is when I am working on a new test kernel. :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrtpeeps
n00b
n00b


Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 6
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shiney wrote:
I had the same thoughts a couple of years ago. I am fine with the resolution, but the color depth can make some of the best splash screens look downright horrid. After doing some soul searching I found the best action was to quit using that other OS and set the grub timeout to 0 bypassing it completley. Now the only time I look at that menu is when I am working on a new test kernel. :)


You can get GRUB to look quite funky actually, I've just never seen a point to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalleRIM
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

just set hidemenu or whatever the option was, so you don't have to see it :D
lilo is ugly by default actually, but I'm using anyway, because I want a 64bit bootloader. Also, I like it's configuration better than grub's.
_________________
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
juantxorena
Apprentice
Apprentice


Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 176
Location: The Shire

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MalleRIM wrote:
just set hidemenu or whatever the option was, so you don't have to see it :D
lilo is ugly by default actually, but I'm using anyway, because I want a 64bit bootloader. Also, I like it's configuration better than grub's.

Grub is 64bit. In fact, the handbook says:
amd64 handbook wrote:
Warning: Using LILO on the AMD64 architecture is not recommended.

_________________
I cannot write English very well. Please, correct any mistake so that I can improve.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalleRIM
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Grub is not 64bit. Just use file on Grub's executables. They are 32bit, even on a 64bit system. When using a non-multilib system, you have to use grub-static, as you can't compile 32bit code. lilo works fine for me, I guess that line in the Handbook is outdated, lilo even has the amd64 keyword.
_________________
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poly_poly-man
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Posts: 2477
Location: RIT, NY, US

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MalleRIM wrote:
Grub is not 64bit. Just use file on Grub's executables. They are 32bit, even on a 64bit system. When using a non-multilib system, you have to use grub-static, as you can't compile 32bit code. lilo works fine for me, I guess that line in the Handbook is outdated, lilo even has the amd64 keyword.


umm... does it really matter?

In an ideal world, the bootloader code wouldn't even go into protected mode - in fact, I don't think it does.

Keep in mind how booting on a x86-like system works - In the beginning, the processor acts exactly like a very fast 8086. When the kernel throws it into protected mode, it becomes a 386 with extra instructions (this is where 32-bit systems stop). From there, another set of instructions is given to enable the 64-bit instructions, making the processor the full 386 with 64-bit and other extra instructions.

Since the kernel throws it into 64-bit mode (or doesn't - if it's a 32-bit kernel, it will stop at 32-bit), it makes sense to keep bootloader code 32-bit clean - and you shouldn't put the processor into 64-bit mode twice... not that it should do any harm.

The same goes with protected mode. In case the kernel needs to do instructions outside of protected mode before jumping into it, the kernel should be booted in the mode the processor starts out in.

Lilo has 32-bit binaries as well - keep in mind that anything compiled with the bin86 tools (like the bootsector of lilo) becomes a binary fit for an 8086 (or 386, if you throw it into protected mode), in other words, completely 32-bit.

poly-p man
_________________
iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAA

avatar: new version of logo - see topic 838248. Potentially still a WiP.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Etal
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 1580

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A few years ago, I got GRUB to run in 1280x1024, but you'd have to use an ebuild that adds themeing support. Also, the one I based it on used a JPEG background, and there was a limit to the size of the image (as in KB), and I really didn't care whether I have a normal GRUB or a high-res grub since it only shows for a few seconds any time I need to reboot my machine...

If anyone really wants it, I can dig it up so you can play with it.
_________________
“And even in authoritarian countries, information networks are helping people discover new facts and making governments more accountable.”– Hillary Clinton, Jan. 21, 2010
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalleRIM
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poly_poly-man wrote:
umm... does it really matter?

Nope, it just makes me feel better :lol: anyway, I shouldn't have started this off-topic conversation
_________________
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 636

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If only it was able to have more colors at least....that would be nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Etal
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Posts: 1580

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Take a look at Gfxboot.

openSUSE wrote:
The bootlogo image back.jpg is a normal jpg file with 800x600 in size, 72dpi and 24bit depth. To reduce the size, use the normal jpg compression (87-90% should be enough) - the image should have no more than 55KB in the end.


As I said earlier, you'll need an ebuild for patched GRUB.
_________________
“And even in authoritarian countries, information networks are helping people discover new facts and making governments more accountable.”– Hillary Clinton, Jan. 21, 2010
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MalleRIM
Guru
Guru


Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Posts: 519
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_gfxmenu_on_patched_Grub
_________________
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dman777
l33t
l33t


Joined: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 636

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Few questions:

1) If I wait for GRUB2, will I be waiting forever?
2). I can't find the latest stable release version and date of GFXGrub. I went on the SuSe page and it doesn't give it. Anyone know where I can find what the latest release version/date is?
3). Where do you get themes for this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nixnut
Administrator
Administrator


Joined: 09 Apr 2004
Posts: 10951
Location: the dutch mountains

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Moved from Gentoo Chat to Off the Wall.
not about gentoo, so moved here.
_________________
Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered

talk is cheap. supply exceeds demand
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cokehabit
Advocate
Advocate


Joined: 23 Apr 2004
Posts: 3302

PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ubuntu has a nice bootloader in the works i think
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Off the Wall All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum