| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
some updates
- stripped mysql warnings
- added en-US language (forced for broken code)
- added odk install patch (I hope it finally installs)
edit #1
- add system libwpg depend
edit #2
- add system libwps depend https://bugs.gentoo.org/284159
(no need to fetch that ebuild, it is in my overlay)
... testing 20090907 bump. _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmm, OOo SDK has some funky default paths ...
- /usr/share/doc/packages
- /usr/share/idl
... and some others that look quite sane.
I wonder why things have to be scattered all around ...
A well, I wonder too often and get headache.  _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jprobichaud Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 81 Location: Montreal, Qc
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I'll try to re-emerge OO with your updated ebuild...
On another topic, I was wondering what kind of improvement does jemalloc provides? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
improvements of jemalloc ...
I would say it is just another alternative to dlmalloc(or whatever name ...)/system alloc.
It is said to minimize memory fragmentation or so ...
firefox and gnash use it already.
I wonder what other applications ship it, too.  _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jprobichaud Tux's lil' helper

Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 81 Location: Montreal, Qc
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I would say it is just another alternative to dlmalloc(or whatever name ...)/system alloc. |
And so? The overall system stays in a "better shape" while OO is used for a long period of time? Should I expect OO to run somewhat faster? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know of no serious(for me) benchmark.
but feel free to test! at least OOo was not unstable here.
to get OOo "faster" it would need a rewrite from scratch with a cleaner api/abi, etc pp.
well, the not many devs of OOo do their best! _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
okay, I knew I missed a diff for the otf01 backport.
update after successful build with cws calc49.
edit #1
okay, the merge went fine.
but I removed the "merge & center" patches from ooo-build in favour of upstream code!
just in case you miss it now.
update very soon ... _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Veteran


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 1957 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yay. Sounds worth another upgrade session.  _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kernelOfTruth Watchman


Joined: 20 Dec 2005 Posts: 5345 Location: Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
albright Veteran


Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 1763 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | there are fresh kde4 fixes in ooo-build; 5hrs old
there is lucene-2.4.1 in portage; 30mins old |
OK, I'll bite. I just synced and see no new ooo and
narry a trace of a new lucene? What's the secret? _________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Veteran


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 1957 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lucene:
| Code: | # equery l -p lucene
* Searching for lucene ...
[-P-] [ ] dev-java/lucene-1.4.3-r3 (1)
[IP-] [ ] dev-java/lucene-1.9.1 (1.9)
[-P-] [ ] dev-java/lucene-2.1.0 (2)
[-P-] [ ] dev-java/lucene-2.1.0-r1 (2.1)
[-P-] [ ~] dev-java/lucene-2.2.0 (2.2)
[-P-] [ ~] dev-java/lucene-2.3.0 (2.3)
[-P-] [ ~] dev-java/lucene-2.3.1 (2.3)
[-P-] [ ~] dev-java/lucene-2.3.2 (2.3)
[-P-] [ ~] dev-java/lucene-2.4.0 (2.4)
[-P-] [ ~] dev-java/lucene-2.4.1 (2.4) |
openoffice:
| Code: | # layman -a openoffice-geki
[snip]
# equery l -o openoffice
* Searching for openoffice ...
[I-O] [ ~] app-office/openoffice-3.1.1.19_pre20090921 (0)
|
 _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
albright Veteran


Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 1763 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | layman -a openoffice-geki |
got it - thanks
(won't build yet - I'm trying make-opts -j1 now) _________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hmm, time to wonder again.
if a build fails emerge points to the build.log.
now then why not do 'grep -ni error /path/to/build.log' or 'grep -n 'error:' /path/to/build.log'?
a brain dump of grep arguments. but that way you see the error and line of logfile quite fast without rebuild. a well, dependend on the error, though.
have fun!  _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
albright Veteran


Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 1763 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many times I've had oo fail and setting to -j1 usually fixes it and
it worked in this case too.
unfortunately, after building I see that the status bar lacks all
icons and there is no text beside some of the checkboxes in
file dialogs (this last problem I also had using the gentoo
ebuild with kde flag)
dropping the kde flag seems to fix everything but it just doesn't look
very pretty  _________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Veteran


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 1957 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
QT- and KDE versions of yours? _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
albright Veteran


Joined: 16 Nov 2003 Posts: 1763 Location: Near Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | QT- and KDE versions of yours? |
kde 4.3.1
qt 4.5.2
you mean, not everybody has my problems?  _________________ .... there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth
doing as simply messing about with Linux ...
(apologies to Kenneth Graeme) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| albright wrote: | Many times I've had oo fail and setting to -j1 usually fixes it and
it worked in this case too. | that is in no means a fix. but o well.
and I heard about some kde plugin issues like that ... _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
genstorm Veteran


Joined: 05 Apr 2007 Posts: 1957 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| albright wrote: | you mean, not everybody has my problems?  |
Well, I for one don't see such problems. But we have almost same versions, me using qt-4.5.9999 instead. _________________ backend.cpp:92:2: warning: #warning TODO - this error message is about as useful as a cooling unit in the arctic |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
okay, kde USEflag is masked for openoffice.
edit #1
found it finally. in some netbsd.se mailing-list ...!
| Quote: | # cat /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask
app-office/openoffice -kde |
_________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geki Advocate


Joined: 13 May 2004 Posts: 2075 Location: Germania
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
bump for a handful of minor fixes ongoing.
[OT]
2to3-3.1 python porting script helps quite a bit.
got gentoolkit, java-config and javatoolkit up with python3.
is there any python3 porting from gentoo devs?
since portage has python3 flag now ... and I fixed a minor import issue there.  _________________ LibreOffice|split-boost|trans-follow xcb port|instruction set analyzer
_________________
sanity . . . is not with me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|