View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: AMD64: What does this gain us? Other than suffering? |
|
|
Been on AMD64 for 2 years, fought through the Firefox/Mplayer/Flash/Java all before. Last time I finally resorted to the chroot method. About a month ago a major user error killed the system, and I had to start over.
So I tried Firefox-bin only to find out that things are being removed from Mplayer-bin and no longer play a bunch of my moves. But Mplayer now seems to not need codecs and works really good, even Firefox plugin. I finally get icedtea and the plugin running, install flash and nspluginwrapper. Java works good. But Flash sucks, working just good enough to taunt me. And Firefox is horribly slow compared to Firefox-bin.
Now I'm trying to get a some ymessenger clone that works with a webcam so my roommate can video chat with her Grandma who bought her a web cam. Of course Yahoo's Linux version doesn't work, and I can't find a web cam enabled clone, and Flash through nspluginwrapper won't work the web cam reliably either.
So, it is build everything in a chroot again, or x86 the whole machine.
What does 64bit gain us??? _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loftwyr l33t


Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 970 Location: 43°38'23.62"N 79°27'8.60"W
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An enjoyable challenge for the geekily inclined. _________________ My emerge --info
Have you run revdep-rebuild lately? It's in gentoolkit and it's worth a shot if things don't work well.
Celebrating 5 years of Gentoo-ing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why are they removing things from mplayer-bin? I think it is at least faad that is missing. _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gerard27 Advocate

Joined: 04 Jan 2004 Posts: 2377 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Last april I got me a new shiny box.
Core2duo and all that.
At last I thought,I can install 64 bit!
A month later I wiped it and did an x86 install.
The things that worked under 64 were not slower under 32.
So I'm not going back to 64 unless all these things have been solved.
Gerard. _________________ To install Gentoo I use sysrescuecd.Based on Gentoo,has firefox to browse Gentoo docs and mc to browse (and edit) files.
The same disk can be used for 32 and 64 bit installs.
You can follow the Handbook verbatim.
http://www.sysresccd.org/Download |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loftwyr l33t


Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 970 Location: 43°38'23.62"N 79°27'8.60"W
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you're using the box for desktop and you don't use any math or memory intensive apps, x86-64 isn't likely going to help you any.
It's faster for a few things but in reality, the average user doesn't need 64 bits. As with 32 bits, eventually that will change but not for a while. _________________ My emerge --info
Have you run revdep-rebuild lately? It's in gentoolkit and it's worth a shot if things don't work well.
Celebrating 5 years of Gentoo-ing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was told(incorrectly) before that you can't mismatch player and plugins, you can run 64b mplayer with the 32b plugins. And vise versa.
FireFox-32b [OK]
Java-32b [OK]
FlashPlayer-32b [OK]
Mplayer-64b [OK]
Mpalyer-plugin-32b (Stolen for Fedora) [OK]
Developers, ridding our systems of 32-bit binaries is a great idea, but a usable system is more important. IMHO _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theethicalatheist n00b


Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 68 Location: University of Massachusetts Lowell
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eh, I've been using 64-bit Linux since November 2007, and I haven't had any issues unique to AMD64. Flash works fine in 64-bit Konqueror and Firefox, Skype works, Google Earth works, NVIDIA provides 64-bit drivers. I really see no reason to stick with i386 at this point. _________________ "Be excellent to each other" - Bill & Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chump wrote: | Eh, I've been using 64-bit Linux since November 2007, and I haven't had any issues unique to AMD64. Flash works fine in 64-bit Konqueror and Firefox, Skype works, Google Earth works, NVIDIA provides 64-bit drivers. I really see no reason to stick with i386 at this point. |
What flash are you using in in 64-bit Firefox? nspluginwrapper was buggy on my system.
Should have been there for amd64 in March 2006, hint ~amd64 _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theethicalatheist n00b


Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 68 Location: University of Massachusetts Lowell
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clytle374 wrote: | chump wrote: | Eh, I've been using 64-bit Linux since November 2007, and I haven't had any issues unique to AMD64. Flash works fine in 64-bit Konqueror and Firefox, Skype works, Google Earth works, NVIDIA provides 64-bit drivers. I really see no reason to stick with i386 at this point. |
What flash are you using in in 64-bit Firefox? nspluginwrapper was buggy on my system.
Should have been there for amd64 in March 2006, hint ~amd64 |
Adobe Flash 9.0.115.0. This latest Flash sometimes segfaults in Firefox, but Konqueror has been stable. _________________ "Be excellent to each other" - Bill & Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chump wrote: | clytle374 wrote: | chump wrote: | Eh, I've been using 64-bit Linux since November 2007, and I haven't had any issues unique to AMD64. Flash works fine in 64-bit Konqueror and Firefox, Skype works, Google Earth works, NVIDIA provides 64-bit drivers. I really see no reason to stick with i386 at this point. |
What flash are you using in in 64-bit Firefox? nspluginwrapper was buggy on my system.
Should have been there for amd64 in March 2006, hint ~amd64 |
Adobe Flash 9.0.115.0. This latest Flash sometimes segfaults in Firefox, but Konqueror has been stable. |
There is a 64-bit plugin?? _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theethicalatheist n00b


Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 68 Location: University of Massachusetts Lowell
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clytle374 wrote: | chump wrote: | clytle374 wrote: | chump wrote: | Eh, I've been using 64-bit Linux since November 2007, and I haven't had any issues unique to AMD64. Flash works fine in 64-bit Konqueror and Firefox, Skype works, Google Earth works, NVIDIA provides 64-bit drivers. I really see no reason to stick with i386 at this point. |
What flash are you using in in 64-bit Firefox? nspluginwrapper was buggy on my system.
Should have been there for amd64 in March 2006, hint ~amd64 |
Adobe Flash 9.0.115.0. This latest Flash sometimes segfaults in Firefox, but Konqueror has been stable. |
There is a 64-bit plugin?? |
No, I'm using 32-bit Flash. There is no 64-bit version. Not that it matters, it works seamlessly. _________________ "Be excellent to each other" - Bill & Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So your running 32-bit Firefox. _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
OldTango l33t


Joined: 21 Feb 2004 Posts: 737
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
chump wrote: | Adobe Flash 9.0.115.0. This latest Flash sometimes segfaults in Firefox, but Konqueror has been stable. | Damn I can't get this version to work in any of my browsers. The recent version upgrade broke flash in all my browsers.
I had to mask it and downgrade to version 9.0.48.0-r1, which works great in 64bit Seamonkey and Firefox using nspluginwrapper........  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MM23 Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've been running unstable ~amd64 Gentoo for like, 8 months now. It's, ironically, stable as hell. Almost more so than x86 was for me on my old P4. Can't really complain...
AMD Athlon X2 6400+, SMP compiled 2.6.24-r2. I listen to music with Amarok, browse the web with Firefox, watch movies with mplayer and vlc (I can watch h264 1280x720 HD episodes of TV shows + DVDs fine...), and use a Graphire4 tablet with Photoshop CS2 in Wine almost daily... pressure sensitivity and all that works fine. I also play EVE Online, UT2004, and Garry's Mod/Team Fortress 2 in Steam without any problems with latest unstable Nvidia drivers. I also screw with compiz-fusion/emerald every once in a while.
How the fuck are people still bitching about 64-bit Linux still not being ready? Maybe I'm just lucky? The only major problem I've been having is insane amounts of lag and unresponsiveness during heavy disk activity -- admittedly, a pretty terrible problem and one I did not have running on 32-bit Gentoo. updatedb + trying to switch tabs takes like 30 seconds.
Also, I keep flash masked at >9.0.48.0-r1 and it runs perfectly in 64-bit Firefox for me with nspluginwrapper. The latest version is a different story, however. Java too, admittedly, is completely fucked, but I hate Java anyway.
I haven't used a chroot yet, and I don't forsee having to in the near future. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theethicalatheist n00b


Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 68 Location: University of Massachusetts Lowell
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clytle374 wrote: | So your running 32-bit Firefox. |
No, I'm running 32-bit Flash inside 64-bit Firefox using nspluginwrapper. _________________ "Be excellent to each other" - Bill & Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MM23 wrote: |
I've been running unstable ~amd64 Gentoo for like, 8 months now. It's, ironically, stable as hell. Almost more so than x86 was for me on my old P4. Can't really complain...
AMD Athlon X2 6400+, SMP compiled 2.6.24-r2. I listen to music with Amarok, browse the web with Firefox, watch movies with mplayer and vlc (I can watch h264 1280x720 HD episodes of TV shows + DVDs fine...), and use a Graphire4 tablet with Photoshop CS2 in Wine almost daily... pressure sensitivity and all that works fine. I also play EVE Online, UT2004, and Garry's Mod/Team Fortress 2 in Steam without any problems with latest unstable Nvidia drivers. I also screw with compiz-fusion/emerald every once in a while.
How the fuck are people still bitching about 64-bit Linux still not being ready? Maybe I'm just lucky? The only major problem I've been having is insane amounts of lag and unresponsiveness during heavy disk activity -- admittedly, a pretty terrible problem and one I did not have running on 32-bit Gentoo. updatedb + trying to switch tabs takes like 30 seconds.
Also, I keep flash masked at >9.0.48.0-r1 and it runs perfectly in 64-bit Firefox for me with nspluginwrapper. The latest version is a different story, however. Java too, admittedly, is completely fucked, but I hate Java anyway.
I haven't used a chroot yet, and I don't forsee having to in the near future.
|
Good thing I don't have those problems, If it took 30 seconds to switch tabs (even once) I would deem it a complete POS and trash it, and not bother bitching. Sounds "ready" too me.
The chroot was was the best option 2 years ago, my last reinstalled. Mostly to get a good mplayer.
Quote: | No, I'm using 32-bit Flash. There is no 64-bit version. Not that it matters, it works seamlessly. |
HAHAHA, have you tried using it? _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
theethicalatheist n00b


Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Posts: 68 Location: University of Massachusetts Lowell
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clytle374 wrote: | Quote: | No, I'm using 32-bit Flash. There is no 64-bit version. Not that it matters, it works seamlessly. |
HAHAHA, have you tried using it? |
Um, I already stated that it works seamlessly. I haven't had any issues specific to AMD64. I've been running Gentoo on my Athlon 64 X2 since I bought it back in November 2007, and it has been extremely fast, stable and smooth. Not a single complaint. There are literally *no* things I am missing from x86 Linux. The handful of proprietary applications that I use work perfectly through the 32-bit Linux compatibility layer. It's entirely seamless. _________________ "Be excellent to each other" - Bill & Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DaggyStyle Watchman


Joined: 22 Mar 2006 Posts: 5945
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use 64bit java plugin (icedtea) and 64bit flash (swfdec) and I have no problems. _________________ Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former - Albert Einstein |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaggyStyle wrote: | I use 64bit java plugin (icedtea) and 64bit flash (swfdec) and I have no problems. |
I'll have to try that. When did swfdec show up? _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
96140 Retired Dev

Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:44 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clytle374 Apprentice

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 226
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | clytle374 wrote: | DaggyStyle wrote: | I use 64bit java plugin (icedtea) and 64bit flash (swfdec) and I have no problems. |
I'll have to try that. When did swfdec show up? |
Uh....a long time ago. 2003. In fairness, it hasn't been really usable until relatively recently.
Anyway, I also have a pair of multilib 64-bit systems working nicely. Surprisingly, nspluginwrapper is now usable, so I run that on my laptop with 64-bit Firefox. First time I've never had to install Firefox-bin and all the 32-bit compatibility libraries. nspluginwrapper is only a little slower on a few sites, and only barely slows down Firefox's startup time once in a while.
I've yet to find any disadvantages to running a 64-bit operating system. There's nothing I can't do. Nothing that forces me to use my 32-bit laptop with similar applications. 64-bit desktop computing is here to stay, and I'm glad it works for Linux. Poor Windows and OSX users still haven't got nearly as much support as we have.  |
Ah, I guess i have missed some memos Was up and running so long I didn't stay up to date, anyway never had a windows system up for 2 years. Would still be up if not for a user error I'm still kicking myself for, Don't ask i won't admit it
Would be nice to have a all 64-bit system, but had real problems with nspluginwrapper. It was the real reason I went back to Firefox 32-bit. Would you mind posting your emerge --info and USE= for mplayer, mplayer-plugin, netsacpe-flash, swfdec, and nspluginwrapper for good luck. _________________ NooB since RedHat 6.1 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MM23 Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
clytle374 wrote: |
Good thing I don't have those problems, If it took 30 seconds to switch tabs (even once) I would deem it a complete POS and trash it, and not bother bitching. Sounds "ready" too me. |
Well, like I said, it only happens under really really heavy disk activity. Not like writing a file or copying music or anything like that, the only real time it seems to happen is during an updatedb or a really big portage sync, and only for less than a minute or so. It's really irritating, sure, but not exactly game-breaking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Clad in Sky l33t


Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 895 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you're saying I should give 64bit a shot when my new stuff arrives on monday or tuesday?
I don't have more than 4GB of RAM, yet. Is there still any advantage in 64bit for me? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cyker Veteran

Joined: 15 Jun 2006 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have time, trying 64bit x86 is worth a go, otherwise I'd stick with 32bit.
There isn't any advantage going 64bit over 32bit unless you're going over 4GB RAM or are dealing with large number crunching. However you pay a price in terms of 32bit compatibility (It works pretty well for the most part, but expect compromises).
That said, if you ONLY use source-compiled packages from Portage, the difference between 32&64 installs is very small. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
droidix n00b

Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 8 Location: Kansas
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even without 4GB+ memory, isn't an AMD64 machine faster since GCC can optimize method calls more often to use registers instead of the stack when passing arguments? Can GCC apply this to local variables of a method as well, forgoing use of the stack completely in some instances? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|