| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
johnny99 Apprentice


Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 214 Location: Berkeley, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
onesandzeros Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 30 Sep 2002 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From the LWN link:
| Quote: | Not close to melt-down
Posted Mar 25, 2008 9:03 UTC (Tue) by sylware (subscriber, #35259) [Link]
A collective tried to take over gentoo control. But it seems they failed (where they clearly
succeeded with gnome).
You have to keep in mind that source based distros provide a flexibility that cannot be match
by binary distros. And of course it's way out of the league for proprietary software. Since
gentoo is the most popular source based distro, some collectives which cannot match its
flexibility have interest in sabotaging it in order to make it look bad. As far as I'm
concerned, gentoo intensity did not flick a second. |
I don't know what is meant exactly, to me collective = Borg. But anyway, look how bad Gnome sucks! Gentoo must not be assimilated! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lightvhawk0 Guru


Joined: 07 Nov 2003 Posts: 388
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would be happy with bonnie++ being added to the livecd's _________________ If God has made us in his image, we have returned him the favor. - Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yngwin Developer


Joined: 19 Dec 2002 Posts: 4219 Location: Suzhou, China
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| onesandzeros wrote: | From the LWN link:
| Quote: | Not close to melt-down
Posted Mar 25, 2008 9:03 UTC (Tue) by sylware (subscriber, #35259) [Link]
A collective tried to take over gentoo control. But it seems they failed (where they clearly
succeeded with gnome). |
I don't know what is meant exactly, to me collective = Borg. But anyway, look how bad Gnome sucks! Gentoo must not be assimilated! |
It's just a load of bollocks, FUD, or whatever you want to call it. _________________ "Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln
Free Culture | Defective by Design | EFF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d2_racing Moderator


Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 12867 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
And yeah, what kind of collective.... the collective will always be the devs and some leaders... _________________ Sysadmin of Funtoo-Québec.org
Wiki
Signature
IRC on Freenode : #funtoo-quebec |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamsterkill Tux's lil' helper


Joined: 01 Apr 2006 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| onesandzeros wrote: | From the LWN link:
| Quote: | Not close to melt-down
Posted Mar 25, 2008 9:03 UTC (Tue) by sylware (subscriber, #35259) [Link]
A collective tried to take over gentoo control. But it seems they failed (where they clearly
succeeded with gnome).
You have to keep in mind that source based distros provide a flexibility that cannot be match
by binary distros. And of course it's way out of the league for proprietary software. Since
gentoo is the most popular source based distro, some collectives which cannot match its
flexibility have interest in sabotaging it in order to make it look bad. As far as I'm
concerned, gentoo intensity did not flick a second. |
I don't know what is meant exactly, to me collective = Borg. But anyway, look how bad Gnome sucks! Gentoo must not be assimilated! |
As I recall... the only attempted "takeover" that occurred was that by Gentoo's founder, drobbins. I'd hardly call him a "collective" though...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnny99 Apprentice


Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 214 Location: Berkeley, California
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|