| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sammy2ooo Apprentice


Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 225
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 6:11 pm Post subject: Sharing an iSCSI LUN |
|
|
Hello everyone
I have two computers: One is my desktop and the other is my NAS.
I have a soft-raid volume configured on the NAS which is available through /dev/md3 using ext4. Currently I am mounting this device on my desktop via iSCSI. But now I would like to access/mount /dev/md3 on the NAS itself without braking any data.
How can I achieve this? Would a one-node gfs cluster serve my need?
Thanks for your input! _________________ - Linux is sexy -
guru@linux:~> who | egrep -i 'blonde|black|brown' | talk && cd ~; wine; talk; touch; unzip; touch; strip; gasp; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; gasp; umount; make clean; sleep; |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alex.blackbit Advocate

Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 2390
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sammy2ooo,
I think it's easier to switch to some network-aware filesystem like NFS, samba or AFS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mad Merlin Veteran

Joined: 09 May 2005 Posts: 1134
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, every machine that mounts the filesystem would need to be part of the GFS cluster (ie, two nodes in this case). Don't do that, just use NFS or Samba unless you really really really need the extra features that a shared filesystem gives you (if you have to ask what those are, you don't need them). _________________ Game! - Where the stick is mightier than the sword! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suicidal l33t


Joined: 30 Jul 2003 Posts: 933 Location: /dev/null
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Modern NFS is almost as efficient as iSCSI, netapp pushes it pretty hard over iSCSI for vmware deployments as you will usually get higher processor usage from the software iscsi adapters. _________________ Who controls the past now, controls the future
Who controls the present now, controls the past. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|