What kernel sources do you use? why?

nitro4ce · n00b Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 23

Poll!

eccerr0r · l33t Joined: 01 Jul 2004 Posts: 924 Location: USA

On my Gentoo boxes, I use a Gentoo kernel since most people will expect that on the Gentoo forums you're using a Gentoo kernel...
Which really doesn't matter as most of the times I end up ruling out all Gentoo hacks as the reason for feature X not working and it gets redirected upstream anyway...

I guess it doesn't matter for me either way, whichever happens to be ready and uncompressed gets used... I don't think I'm going out of my way to patch all of Gentoo patches to build a kernel for non-Gentoo box...
_________________
<-- 1 4m |\|()7 1337. |)()|\|7 91mm3 \/\/4|'32.

enderandrew · l33t Joined: 25 Oct 2005 Posts: 731

mm-sources, viper-sources, nitro-sources, no-sources, kamikaze-sources, etc. I like to try them all. I am a fan of Reiser4, and many bleeding edge patchsets.
_________________
Nihilism makes me smile.

Mantaar · Apprentice Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 219

Well, I'm using/maintaining my own, not controlled by the package manager.

Heck, I just booted the new 2.6.23 with CFS and Realtime patches... that thing is fscking fast!
Seriously, I never thought that random kernel hackery could give you that much of an improvement in terms of desktop performance, but this thing is really s(l)ick...

Darn, gotta get away from Gentoo, already sounding like a real ricer... ;-)

_________________
Error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function.

SiberianSniper · Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject:

I'm still using 2.6.21-ck. SD works great and I've had nothing but trouble with 2.6.22. But I might give 2.6.23 a try someday when I'm sufficiently bored :wink:

Phenax · l33t Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 961

gentoo-sources.

Nice, stable, nothing breaks, no drama, fully supported, no insanely short/long update schedule.

dmpogo · Guru Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Posts: 487 Location: Canada

wuzzerd · Guru Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 313 Location: New Mexico

Normally gentoo-sources. I did use vanilla for awhile when something was broken. Eventually I figured out what was wrong with the .config.

davidgurvich · Veteran Joined: 23 Apr 2004 Posts: 1039

vanilla-sources for 2 reasons. Third party patches are usually against the vanilla kernel, plus more people have access to it to find bugs.

nightmorph · Developer Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1211 Location: SoCal

For my desktop, I use my own: night-sources. See the page for why. For the laptop, I mostly use gentoo-sources, though since it triple-boots I do have Arch Linux's stock kernel26 (that kernel is a real piece o'crap, FYI).
_________________
<UzzaDead> What is CONFIG_USB_MON?
<petteyg> A Jamaican USB configuration?

dirtyepic: "We have more cupholders."

GDP || pkgcore

ToeiRei · l33t Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 646 Location: Austria

I am using my own patchset...
_________________
Thinking is dangerous. It leads to ideas.

bunder · Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:23 am Post subject:

gentoo-sources, but i need to add a patch to my mythtv setup so my remote can work.

_________________
bunder @ freenode | gentoo shells | bunhax - tame your SMP! | i still wish i could make my sig bigger :lol:

AllenJB · Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:36 am Post subject:

gentoo-sources (main), suspend2-sources (laptop) and xen-sources (sandbox).
_________________
My ebuilds (UT2k4 Map Packs, Uplink, Patched asus_acpi & madwifi-hal for Eee PC - see also atl2 for the EeePC)

nixnut · Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:45 am Post subject:

hardened-sources for my desktop system, gentoo-sources for my development machine.
_________________
Please add [solved] to the initial post's subject line if you feel your problem is resolved. Help answer the unanswered

talk is cheap. supply exceeds demand

Neo2 · Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject:

Always gentoo-sources for me. They're mantained by gentoo team and are the default for kernel installation. As long as they work fine, I'll keep them

_________________
Neo2
Unofficial minimal 2008.0 for x86/amd64 w/reiser4+truecrypt

john_r_graham · Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject:

I use gentoo-sources plus the Reiser4 patchset, which has been rock solid for me.

- John

lmmsci · Tux's lil' helper Joined: 20 May 2006 Posts: 144

I've been using ck-sources and viper branch. Now I'm using kamikaze sources. Excellent patchset.

timeBandit · Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:53 pm Post subject:

Pithlit · l33t Joined: 27 Dec 2003 Posts: 871 Location: fuhen

What can I say... vanilla just tastes awesome.
_________________
If someone solves a problem for you say thanks... and put [SOLVED] in the title!

Mantaar · Apprentice Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 219

Genone · Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:07 am Post subject:

djdunn · Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:16 am Post subject:

Normally, id probably do Vanilla but, like everything else i fell on love with about Gentoo over the years the minimalist patches on are really nice.
_________________
Now, with penguins, (cuddly such), "contented" means it has either just gotten laid, or it's stuffed on herring. Take it from me, I'm an expert on penguins, those are really the only two options.

--Linus Torvalds

Mantaar · Apprentice Joined: 17 May 2007 Posts: 219

SwissBushIndian · n00b Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 27

Gentoo sources on both my machines at home and suspend2-sources on my laptop. On one machine (which is more or less there for testing) I have different Kernels once in a while, but I usually stick to gentoo-sources most of the time, I do like vanilla-sources as well.

Urban Cowboy · n00b Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 64

ha.. I think the poll needs more options. I usually use gentoo sources, but I have used vanilla and hardened. I tried nitro, but the power went out during the install and a few things got REALLY screwy.

How many supported kernels are there?

gentoo
vanilla
ck
hardened
mm
nitro
kamikaze

That's just off the top of my head.. and i'm not sure which ones are officially "supported"