Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Gentoo Forums
Quick Search: in
Arch vs. Gentoo?
View unanswered posts
View posts from last 24 hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next  
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
96140
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

--

Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:05 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kensai
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 568
Location: Puerto Rico

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kernelcowboy wrote:

I came up with the following groups.

1) Control freak system ("i like it", "it's just right", "the forums", "use flag", etc. All valid but really add up to one user group.)
2) Programmer workstation
3) Educational platform

I was 3, then 1, now I'm still sort of a 1, so I'm using ARCH. (When I get it all out of my system, I will probably go to PCLinuxOS or Ubuntu.)
I'm a java programmer, so I never really took advantage of 2.

Well I think I was 3 now I'm 1 as well, still there is another group the Placebo effect group lol, nah, seriously the Gamers group I like gentoo for gaming since I feel my games are optimized. :wink:
_________________
Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Perspective of a Thinking Human Being
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Misfit138
n00b
n00b


Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightmorph wrote:
You mentioned ABS' similarity to ports ... bah. After all, Portage is better than ports! :D


Hehe...There are some who feel just the opposite. ;)
Enjoy. :D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that Portage is from the basic idea of the Ports from FreeBSD or OpenBSD.

So, portage is from there...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96140
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

--

Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:04 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kensai
Guru
Guru


Joined: 09 Mar 2004
Posts: 568
Location: Puerto Rico

PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightmorph wrote:
Aye, it's originally inspired by 'em, but it has since exceeded 'em.

Well as a person who used FreeBSD as my main OS for like 6 months I can say yeah, Gentoo has in some way exceeded them, because ports can sometime become tedious to maintain even with portupgrade and the likes.
_________________
Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Perspective of a Thinking Human Being
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HydroDiOxide
n00b
n00b


Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 55
Location: Groningen

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After the libexpat drama I made the switch from Gentoo to Arch. I must say, on my older laptop (800mhz Celeron, Coppermine) Gentoo (with Gnome) ran smoother than Arch with XFCE does. However, compiling took such a long time on my laptop, I must admit the binaries of Arch are bliss! Also, configuration on Arch is, for a Linux n00b like myself, easier to understand and execute than on Gentoo. That might also be due to the fact that Gentoo is MORE customizable...

Both distros gave me a lean laptop. Gentoo ran smoother, but Arch installs MUCH faster.

MHO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightmorph wrote:
Aye, it's originally inspired by 'em, but it has since exceeded 'em.


Of course, no doubt about that :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HydroDiOxide wrote:
After the libexpat drama I made the switch from Gentoo to Arch. I must say, on my older laptop (800mhz Celeron, Coppermine) Gentoo (with Gnome) ran smoother than Arch with XFCE does. However, compiling took such a long time on my laptop, I must admit the binaries of Arch are bliss! Also, configuration on Arch is, for a Linux n00b like myself, easier to understand and execute than on Gentoo. That might also be due to the fact that Gentoo is MORE customizable...

Both distros gave me a lean laptop. Gentoo ran smoother, but Arch installs MUCH faster.

MHO


I'm agree with that :)

I use Gentoo on my laptop and Arch on my old coucou :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jonnevers
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 02 Jan 2003
Posts: 1594
Location: Gentoo64 land

PostPosted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HydroDiOxide wrote:
Arch installs MUCH faster.

who'd of thunk it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HydroDiOxide wrote:
After the libexpat drama I made the switch from Gentoo to Arch. I must say, on my older laptop (800mhz Celeron, Coppermine) Gentoo (with Gnome) ran smoother than Arch with XFCE does. However, compiling took such a long time on my laptop, I must admit the binaries of Arch are bliss! Also, configuration on Arch is, for a Linux n00b like myself, easier to understand and execute than on Gentoo. That might also be due to the fact that Gentoo is MORE customizable...

Both distros gave me a lean laptop. Gentoo ran smoother, but Arch installs MUCH faster.

MHO

Fair enough: if you're using binaries, you're not getting any USE flags I take it? In which case, I'd still prefer to use
PORTAGE_BINHOST="http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/<arch>"
PKGDIR="/path/to/store"
..in make.conf and get Gentoo config with fast installs, because I think Gentoo gets a lot of stuff right.
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/html/ is the browse page.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NaturalRandom
n00b
n00b


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 24
Location: Next to neighbour

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I run gentoo in a 1Ghz Duron, but I do all compiling from my AMD64 3500+.
Overall, it's pretty fast! An ubuntu user at my university was impressed when I told him that it never ran at over 500mhz to preserve battery life!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d2_racing
Bodhisattva
Bodhisattva


Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Posts: 13047
Location: Ste-Foy,Canada

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NaturalRandom wrote:
I run gentoo in a 1Ghz Duron, but I do all compiling from my AMD64 3500+.
Overall, it's pretty fast! An ubuntu user at my university was impressed when I told him that it never ran at over 500mhz to preserve battery life!


Yeah in fact, a Gentoo box can be quite fast even on a old coucou :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
omnio
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Telexen wrote:

- You're not limited to source with Gentoo like *most* of their users will claim...there are plenty of binary host servers to use if you want binary packages

This is good to know. But what other bin servers are there than http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org ? There are some important packages at tinderbox, but I don't see anything related to XFCE or KDE. Also I didn't see anything related to bin servers in the documentation, but maybe this is normal since these servers are not official ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

omnio wrote:
This is good to know. But what other bin servers are there than http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org ? There are some important packages at tinderbox, but I don't see anything related to XFCE or KDE. Also I didn't see anything related to bin servers in the documentation, but maybe this is normal since these servers are not official ?

Support for bin_hosts hasn't been as effective as it could be. Portage is being upgraded to handle them better. In the meantime, update handles them pretty nicely.

wrt to packages available, tinderbox is more the base (it's also compiled with relocatable code for security.)
PORTAGE_BINHOST="http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/binpkg/i686-stable" is another good one (there's an amd64 one as well, and unstable variants), with more desktop stuff. With all of these, though, there's a timelag between stuff hitting the tree, it hitting mirrors (which happens even if you're not using a binhost) and packages actually being compiled correctly and available.
Really it's up to users to set up their own binhosts; portage just gives you the tools to do it. If you do use these, consider donating some money to help the people who provide the binhosts, or they'll get shut down if they use too much resource. For gentoo, it's solar who runs it: I'm sure any help can just go to Gentoo itself, and for gentooexperimental, it's bonsaikitten who you can find in #gentoo-chat on irc.freenode.org.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
omnio
n00b
n00b


Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

omnio wrote:
Thank you.

You're welcome :-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96140
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

--

Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PaulBredbury
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 7310

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In Gentoo, I didn't use module-rebuild. People should know what to recompile - these are not meant to be amateurs' distros.

For Arch, see my little script.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
96140
Retired Dev
Retired Dev


Joined: 23 Jan 2005
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

--

Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:47 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
erm67
l33t
l33t


Joined: 01 Nov 2005
Posts: 653
Location: EU

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nightmorph wrote:
However, using my own kernel config is far easier than blacklisting dozens of modules I don't need in the default kernel26 Arch ships.


I do not need any non-standard module, but creating a custom kernel-package isn't that difficult:
Code:

config a kernel as you like and keep the .config
cp -R /var/abs/core/base/kernel26/ .
cd kernel26
cp /what/ever/.config config
makepkg -g
<copy the md5 hashes generated>
vi PKGBUILD
<replace the md5 hashes with those in the clipboard and save>
makepkg

done.
This works only if the changes are minimal of course, like changing SMP support or processor type.
_________________
Ok boomer
True ignorance is not the absence of knowledge, but the refusal to acquire it.
Ab esse ad posse valet, a posse ad esse non valet consequentia

My fediverse account: @erm67@erm67.dynu.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PaulBredbury wrote:
In Gentoo, I didn't use module-rebuild. People should know what to recompile - these are not meant to be amateurs' distros.

Meh, module-rebuild is perfect imo. It's not a question of not knowing what I've added, but rather of convenience (or not being a masochist as nightmorph put it ;) Also, having a standard utility means it's easy to adminster a gentoo box, or indeed script the process.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AllenJB
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 1285

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

steveL wrote:
PaulBredbury wrote:
In Gentoo, I didn't use module-rebuild. People should know what to recompile - these are not meant to be amateurs' distros.

Meh, module-rebuild is perfect imo. It's not a question of not knowing what I've added, but rather of convenience (or not being a masochist as nightmorph put it ;) Also, having a standard utility means it's easy to adminster a gentoo box, or indeed script the process.


It's not quite perfect!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steveL
Watchman
Watchman


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 5153
Location: The Peanut Gallery

PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AllenJB wrote:
It's not quite perfect!

Well I can't understand why that patch hasn't gone in. I asked in #-kernel but no response. Safer to quote "${tomerge[@]}" as well (don't argue ;p)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
macgyvier
n00b
n00b


Joined: 19 Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Denver, CO

PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's really encouraging to me to see both arch and gentoo communities coming together to discuss the strengths and weakness of each distro. I like the fact that there are two different ideologies here and each can contribute. I had been an avid gentoo user for years before installing arch. I've enjoyed arch, but I know that both have their place. There is definitely a wealth of knowledge between the arch and gentoo wiki's and forums.

I'm excited to see what the future holds for both :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Gentoo Forums Forum Index Gentoo Chat All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 6 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum