View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kensai Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 568 Location: Puerto Rico
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
kernelcowboy wrote: |
I came up with the following groups.
1) Control freak system ("i like it", "it's just right", "the forums", "use flag", etc. All valid but really add up to one user group.)
2) Programmer workstation
3) Educational platform
I was 3, then 1, now I'm still sort of a 1, so I'm using ARCH. (When I get it all out of my system, I will probably go to PCLinuxOS or Ubuntu.)
I'm a java programmer, so I never really took advantage of 2. |
Well I think I was 3 now I'm 1 as well, still there is another group the Placebo effect group lol, nah, seriously the Gamers group I like gentoo for gaming since I feel my games are optimized. _________________ Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Perspective of a Thinking Human Being |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Misfit138 n00b
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | You mentioned ABS' similarity to ports ... bah. After all, Portage is better than ports! |
Hehe...There are some who feel just the opposite.
Enjoy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that Portage is from the basic idea of the Ports from FreeBSD or OpenBSD.
So, portage is from there... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 9:04 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kensai Guru
Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 568 Location: Puerto Rico
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | Aye, it's originally inspired by 'em, but it has since exceeded 'em. |
Well as a person who used FreeBSD as my main OS for like 6 months I can say yeah, Gentoo has in some way exceeded them, because ports can sometime become tedious to maintain even with portupgrade and the likes. _________________ Gentoo: Gigabyte: nFORCE 2: nVIDIA GeForce 6600: AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Perspective of a Thinking Human Being |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HydroDiOxide n00b
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 55 Location: Groningen
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
After the libexpat drama I made the switch from Gentoo to Arch. I must say, on my older laptop (800mhz Celeron, Coppermine) Gentoo (with Gnome) ran smoother than Arch with XFCE does. However, compiling took such a long time on my laptop, I must admit the binaries of Arch are bliss! Also, configuration on Arch is, for a Linux n00b like myself, easier to understand and execute than on Gentoo. That might also be due to the fact that Gentoo is MORE customizable...
Both distros gave me a lean laptop. Gentoo ran smoother, but Arch installs MUCH faster.
MHO |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | Aye, it's originally inspired by 'em, but it has since exceeded 'em. |
Of course, no doubt about that |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
HydroDiOxide wrote: | After the libexpat drama I made the switch from Gentoo to Arch. I must say, on my older laptop (800mhz Celeron, Coppermine) Gentoo (with Gnome) ran smoother than Arch with XFCE does. However, compiling took such a long time on my laptop, I must admit the binaries of Arch are bliss! Also, configuration on Arch is, for a Linux n00b like myself, easier to understand and execute than on Gentoo. That might also be due to the fact that Gentoo is MORE customizable...
Both distros gave me a lean laptop. Gentoo ran smoother, but Arch installs MUCH faster.
MHO |
I'm agree with that
I use Gentoo on my laptop and Arch on my old coucou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonnevers Veteran
Joined: 02 Jan 2003 Posts: 1594 Location: Gentoo64 land
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HydroDiOxide wrote: | Arch installs MUCH faster. |
who'd of thunk it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
HydroDiOxide wrote: | After the libexpat drama I made the switch from Gentoo to Arch. I must say, on my older laptop (800mhz Celeron, Coppermine) Gentoo (with Gnome) ran smoother than Arch with XFCE does. However, compiling took such a long time on my laptop, I must admit the binaries of Arch are bliss! Also, configuration on Arch is, for a Linux n00b like myself, easier to understand and execute than on Gentoo. That might also be due to the fact that Gentoo is MORE customizable...
Both distros gave me a lean laptop. Gentoo ran smoother, but Arch installs MUCH faster.
MHO |
Fair enough: if you're using binaries, you're not getting any USE flags I take it? In which case, I'd still prefer to use
PORTAGE_BINHOST="http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/default-linux/<arch>"
PKGDIR="/path/to/store"
..in make.conf and get Gentoo config with fast installs, because I think Gentoo gets a lot of stuff right.
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/html/ is the browse page. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NaturalRandom n00b
Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 24 Location: Next to neighbour
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I run gentoo in a 1Ghz Duron, but I do all compiling from my AMD64 3500+.
Overall, it's pretty fast! An ubuntu user at my university was impressed when I told him that it never ran at over 500mhz to preserve battery life! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d2_racing Bodhisattva
Joined: 25 Apr 2005 Posts: 13047 Location: Ste-Foy,Canada
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
NaturalRandom wrote: | I run gentoo in a 1Ghz Duron, but I do all compiling from my AMD64 3500+.
Overall, it's pretty fast! An ubuntu user at my university was impressed when I told him that it never ran at over 500mhz to preserve battery life! |
Yeah in fact, a Gentoo box can be quite fast even on a old coucou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
omnio n00b
Joined: 16 Jun 2007 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Telexen wrote: |
- You're not limited to source with Gentoo like *most* of their users will claim...there are plenty of binary host servers to use if you want binary packages
|
This is good to know. But what other bin servers are there than http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org ? There are some important packages at tinderbox, but I don't see anything related to XFCE or KDE. Also I didn't see anything related to bin servers in the documentation, but maybe this is normal since these servers are not official ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
omnio wrote: | This is good to know. But what other bin servers are there than http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org ? There are some important packages at tinderbox, but I don't see anything related to XFCE or KDE. Also I didn't see anything related to bin servers in the documentation, but maybe this is normal since these servers are not official ? |
Support for bin_hosts hasn't been as effective as it could be. Portage is being upgraded to handle them better. In the meantime, update handles them pretty nicely.
wrt to packages available, tinderbox is more the base (it's also compiled with relocatable code for security.)
PORTAGE_BINHOST="http://dev.gentooexperimental.org/binpkg/i686-stable" is another good one (there's an amd64 one as well, and unstable variants), with more desktop stuff. With all of these, though, there's a timelag between stuff hitting the tree, it hitting mirrors (which happens even if you're not using a binhost) and packages actually being compiled correctly and available.
Really it's up to users to set up their own binhosts; portage just gives you the tools to do it. If you do use these, consider donating some money to help the people who provide the binhosts, or they'll get shut down if they use too much resource. For gentoo, it's solar who runs it: I'm sure any help can just go to Gentoo itself, and for gentooexperimental, it's bonsaikitten who you can find in #gentoo-chat on irc.freenode.org. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
omnio n00b
Joined: 16 Jun 2007 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
You're welcome :-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulBredbury Watchman
Joined: 14 Jul 2005 Posts: 7310
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
96140 Retired Dev
Joined: 23 Jan 2005 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by 96140 on Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
erm67 l33t
Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 653 Location: EU
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nightmorph wrote: | However, using my own kernel config is far easier than blacklisting dozens of modules I don't need in the default kernel26 Arch ships. |
I do not need any non-standard module, but creating a custom kernel-package isn't that difficult:
Code: |
config a kernel as you like and keep the .config
cp -R /var/abs/core/base/kernel26/ .
cd kernel26
cp /what/ever/.config config
makepkg -g
<copy the md5 hashes generated>
vi PKGBUILD
<replace the md5 hashes with those in the clipboard and save>
makepkg
|
done.
This works only if the changes are minimal of course, like changing SMP support or processor type. _________________ Ok boomer
True ignorance is not the absence of knowledge, but the refusal to acquire it.
Ab esse ad posse valet, a posse ad esse non valet consequentia
My fediverse account: @erm67@erm67.dynu.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Meh, module-rebuild is perfect imo. It's not a question of not knowing what I've added, but rather of convenience (or not being a masochist as nightmorph put it ;) Also, having a standard utility means it's easy to adminster a gentoo box, or indeed script the process. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AllenJB Veteran
Joined: 02 Sep 2005 Posts: 1285
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
steveL wrote: |
Meh, module-rebuild is perfect imo. It's not a question of not knowing what I've added, but rather of convenience (or not being a masochist as nightmorph put it Also, having a standard utility means it's easy to adminster a gentoo box, or indeed script the process. |
It's not quite perfect! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steveL Watchman
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 5153 Location: The Peanut Gallery
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I can't understand why that patch hasn't gone in. I asked in #-kernel but no response. Safer to quote "${tomerge[@]}" as well (don't argue ;p) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
macgyvier n00b
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 Posts: 6 Location: Denver, CO
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's really encouraging to me to see both arch and gentoo communities coming together to discuss the strengths and weakness of each distro. I like the fact that there are two different ideologies here and each can contribute. I had been an avid gentoo user for years before installing arch. I've enjoyed arch, but I know that both have their place. There is definitely a wealth of knowledge between the arch and gentoo wiki's and forums.
I'm excited to see what the future holds for both |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|